United International Business Schools - UIBS vs KdG University of Applied Sciences and Arts - KdG vs University of Antwerp vs Antwerp Management School - AMS vs Thomas More University of Applied Sciences
Side-by-side comparison from 171 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive and helpful faculty
- +Positive and enriching learning experience
- +Safe and well-equipped campus
- +Practical, real-world learning and projects
- +Supportive and approachable lecturers/professors
- +Excellent facilities and resources
- +Engaging and well-structured programmes with relevant, practical content.
- +Approachable and knowledgeable professors fostering a welcoming, collaborative atmosphere.
- +Opportunities for networking and building a strong social and professional community.
- +High-quality Master of Finance program and valuable learning experiences.
- +Limited job placement assistance in Belgium for non-Dutch/French speakers.
- +Strong academic learning and personal growth
- +Welcoming international atmosphere and community integration
- +Supportive and accessible professors and engaging course content
- +Hands-on practical learning
- +Industry-relevant skills and job preparation
- +Supportive and approachable faculty
- +Practical, applicable learning
- +Supportive and understanding lecturers
- +Welcoming, stress-free environment
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support frustrates students.
- -Inadequate facilities and resources.
- -Poor communication and disorganization.
- -Lack of support and understanding from staff.
- -Intense academic pressure negatively impacts student mental health.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and lack of engagement are prevalent.
- -Administrative & management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Facilities are often outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring frustration.
- -Negative staff and teacher attitudes created a disrespectful and unsupportive learning environment.
- -Communication and administrative issues were a persistent source of frustration.
- -Some facilities and technological resources were outdated and insufficient.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of communication and support from staff is a common complaint.
Academic and environmental aspects of the university are highly regarded, with professors and location both receiving a near-perfect score of 4.75. Student life is also a positive, scoring 4.25, and internationality and value are strong at 4.5. Facilities and accommodation present the weakest areas, both rated at 4.
This university demonstrates a particularly strong showing in its Internationality, receiving the highest rating. Its Value and Location are also highly commended by students. Conversely, Accomodation presents the lowest score among the surveyed areas, though Facilities also scores below the average. Overall, student life and professors are rated very favorably.
This institution receives favorable marks across multiple aspects. Its professors are particularly well-regarded, standing out as its strongest area. While accommodation and internationality also received solid scores, internationality is rated slightly lower compared to other surveyed categories. Overall, the university presents a generally positive picture with key strengths in academic instruction.
This institution receives strong marks for its **Facilities** and **Professors**, both scoring a 4. Areas like **Student Life** and **Accomodation** are rated moderately well, with **Internationality** and **Value** also performing decently. The lowest score is for **Location**, indicating this is the area with the most room for improvement.
This university demonstrates notable strengths in its Internationality (4.53), Location (4.44), and Value (4.33) metrics. Professors also received a high rating at 4.27. Student Life, Facilities, and Accommodations are also well-regarded, with scores of 4.10, 4.20, and 4.00 respectively. The university presents a generally positive picture based on these evaluations.
An excellent overall assessment is evident, with the university excelling particularly in **Value** and **Internationality**, both receiving top marks. **Location** also garners a strong score. The **Student Life** category, while still positive, shows a slightly lower rating compared to other aspects.
This institution garners outstanding scores in several key areas, including facilities, location, student life, internationality, and value, all receiving a perfect 5. Professors are also highly rated at 4. However, accommodation presents a clear area for improvement, with a significantly lower rating of 2. This suggests an excellent overall experience, with the exception of housing options.
With an average rating of 4.5/5, ~75% of reviews are positive, highlighting a supportive learning environment and helpful, passionate faculty. One review mentioned slow administrative services.
With 62 reviews and an average rating of 4.39, ~93% of feedback is positive. Students frequently highlight engaging, practical learning with real-world projects and supportive professors. There are no negative reviews.
University feedback is highly positive, with ~97% of 37 reviews rating it 4-5 stars. Students praise well-planned courses, excellent lecturers, and a welcoming, inspiring atmosphere. One review mentioned study pressure and mental health concerns.
Two positive reviews highlight quality education and valuable program learning, with an average rating of 3.67/5. The primary recurring theme is the difficulty in finding employment in Belgium without Dutch or French proficiency.
The vast majority of reviews are highly positive, praising academic learning, personal growth, and the welcoming international environment. Students appreciate supportive professors and a good balance of theory and practical projects.
With an average rating of 4.46, approximately 92% of reviews are positive, highlighting hands-on learning, practical skills for industry, and approachable teachers. One negative review mentioned disrespectful staff attitudes.
The sole review is overwhelmingly positive (100%), rating the university 5/5. Students highlight comfort for international learners, practical programs, engaging activities, and supportive lecturers as key strengths.
Nothing to show
If you are looking for a real business experience and course, definitely apply for IBM at KDG. This degree is awesome. Every day, I get to learn new things from different experts and Lectures, and I fall more in love with the business world.
I would like to express my sincere appreciation for the excellent Legal Technology and Responsible AI Programme. The programme provided a valuable opportunity to deepen my understanding of the legal, regulatory, and technological issues surrounding artificial intelligence and data governance. In particular, I would like to thank Prof. Dr. Jan Blockx for his outstanding academic leadership and engaging lectures. The course content was well-structured, insightful, and highly relevant to current developments in technology law. His ability to connect legal theory with practical challenges helped participants better understand the opportunities and risks associated with AI and emerging technologies. I would also like to express my gratitude to Prof. Toon Calders for his excellent contribution to the programme. His clear and accessible explanations of AI concepts provided an important technical perspective that complemented the legal discussions. The interdisciplinary approach greatly enhanced the overall learning experience and strengthened participants' understanding of responsible AI. In addition, I would like to thank Nele Voorspoels for her exceptional administrative support. Her prompt communication, attention to detail, and assistance with travel ensured a smooth and enjoyable experience throughout the course. Overall, the programme exceeded my expectations. The combination of high-quality teaching, excellent organization, and meaningful discussions created an inspiring learning environment.
Nothing to show
Overall, I had a very good experience at the university. There were plenty of friendly and approachable students and teachers, which made for a welcoming environment. I studied the Data Science and Security program, which, at least during my time there, was considerably more programming-focused than I initially expected. This was something to keep in mind when choosing the program. I had some particularly great teachers, especially Collin and Elke. They made my experience much more seamless and valuable through their support and teaching. One area that could have been improved was the scheduling of certain classes, particularly in security. Some sessions were extremely long, which made it difficult to maintain energy and attention throughout the entire class. Since graduating, the campus has also undergone major renovations, and from what I’ve seen, it looks great now. Overall, I look back on my time there positively and feel that the experience provided me with a solid foundation.
Following the Advanced bachelor of bioinformatics in Howest Hogeschool, I have to say that is a really well structured program that targets to bridge the gap between theory and working environment and give you the necessary supplies to build up your future ! Professors are are really approachable and willing to help you.
Nothing to show
