Université Paris-Est Créteil - UPEC vs IÉSEG School of Management vs SKEMA Business School vs Excelia Business School vs IAE Gustave Eiffel School Of Management - IAE
Side-by-side comparison from 453 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Competent and supportive faculty
- +Strong sense of community and student support
- +Diverse academic programs and enriching experiences
- +Engaging and practical learning experiences
- +Strong international community and global opportunities
- +Supportive professors and active student associations
- +Practical, career-focused programs and skill development
- +Engaging student life and impactful associations
- +Strong academic faculty and international opportunities
- +Supportive, approachable professors and strong emphasis on practical, real-world business applications.
- +Diverse, international environment fostering personal growth and unforgettable shared experiences.
- +Opportunities for teamwork, self-discovery, and engaging learning through case studies and projects.
- +Passionate professors and superior educational experience
- +Strong marketing and business programs
- +Excellent career preparation and networking opportunities
- +Culturally diverse environment and international campus access
- +Supportive and organized academic environment with helpful instructors
- +Opportunities for career advancement and independent learning
- +Industry-active instructors and professional preparation
- +Supportive and welcoming atmosphere
- +Emphasis on practical, project-based learning
- -Administrative and management issues caused by unqualified staff were a major problem.
- -Facilities were considered unsuitable and outdated.
- -The course not being taught in the promised language was a significant disappointment.
- -Last-minute changes disrupt scheduling and planning.
- -Perceived lack of effort to improve classroom experience.
- -Concerns about course offerings and professor quality.
- -Poor administrative and management issues, including communication and exam organization.
- -Focus on profit over student well-being and discriminatory practices.
- -Unorganized program structure and overwhelming course load.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from faculty are prevalent complaints.
- -Administrative and management issues create frustration and inefficiency.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and a lack of student support lead to dissatisfaction.
- -Lack of extracurriculars and limited opportunities for lower-year students.
- -Poor campus environment and a perceived low academic standard.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Facilities are frequently described as outdated and in poor condition.
- -Teaching quality and curriculum relevance are inconsistent and often disappointing.
This institution demonstrates a robust performance in several key areas. Facilities and Internationality stand out with the highest ratings, both at 3.94. The university also scores well for its Professors (3.81). Conversely, Student Life (3.43) and Accomodation (3.44) received the lowest marks, indicating potential areas for improvement, alongside Location (3.63) and Value (3.56).
This university receives high marks across most categories, particularly excelling in **Internationality** (4.55). **Location** (4.29), **Student Life** (4.25), and **Value** (4.31) also demonstrate considerable strengths. Conversely, **Accomodation** (3.78) stands out as the weakest area among the assessed aspects, while **Facilities** (4.09) received a solid, yet comparatively lower, rating.
This university receives high marks for its professors and internationality, with ratings of 4.42 and 4.35 respectively. Location and facilities are also well-regarded, both scoring above 4.2. Student life and value are rated around 4.0, indicating solid performance. The weakest area is accommodation, which receives a score of 3.59.
This university garners an impressive average rating of 4.19. Its strongest areas are **Internationality** (4.57) and **Student Life** (4.34), indicating a vibrant and globally connected campus environment. **Facilities** (4.24) and **Location** (4.27) also score very well. The weakest area is **Accomodation**, receiving a rating of 3.74, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect.
This institution achieves exceptional scores in several key areas, with perfect ratings for facilities, professors, accommodation, internationality, and overall value. Student life and location are also strong points, receiving a very respectable 4 out of 5. The weakest aspect, though still highly rated, is the location at 4 stars.
With a strong emphasis on location and internationality, this university also scores very well for its professors and student life. Value for money is also a positive aspect. The weakest areas, while still respectable, are its facilities and accommodation.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its **Value** (4.67) and **Facilities** (4.47), indicating high satisfaction in these key areas. **Accomodation** (4.33) and **Student Life** (4.20) also received positive scores. However, the university's **Location** (3.13) stands out as a comparatively weaker aspect, with **Internationality** (3.87) also receiving a moderate rating.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting competent and pedagogical teachers, and strong student-to-student support. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions issues with English language proficiency among staff and unqualified educational management. The average rating is 3.78/5.
With a 4.38/5 average, ~99% of reviews are positive, praising interesting classes, international experiences, and practical preparation for work. A minimal 0.8% of feedback is negative, citing some course content and last-minute changes.
Approximately 90% of reviews are positive, highlighting great teachers, valuable student associations, and international opportunities. A small fraction of negative feedback, around 3%, mentions concerns with management, communication, and organization.
The reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%), highlighting excellent professors, practical courses, and a strong international environment. Students appreciate teamwork opportunities and the school's ability to foster personal growth and unforgettable experiences.
The single review is highly positive, rating the university 5/5. It praises professors' passion and educational experience as exceptional. No negative feedback was received.
With a 4.54/5 average rating, nearly all students praise Schiller for its culturally rich environment and global opportunities. A small portion of feedback (~7.7%) suggests the university may be better suited for those seeking a less demanding academic path.
With a 4.4/5 average rating from 15 reviews, ~93% are positive. Students praise quality teaching from industry professionals and a supportive, welcoming atmosphere. The heavy workload and project-focused curriculum prepare them well for professional careers.
I am personally studying in Administration and international exchanges, in my 3rd year and I have been experiencing a lot of things in this university. Indeed, it is important to know that I have been a student during the Covid period, a hard time for everyone. Out of this, I would like to specify that there are very very interesting teachers who made me happy about going to class, I mean they are not just reading a PowerPoint, they are dedicated to their students, particularly my Spanish teacher, he is the only one really invested in our orientation, and I mean I am on my 3rd year, I had to choose where to go for next year and he was the only one to guide us a little bit, the black point is that with him we don't have a really organised class, but to me it was ok, I enjoyed it because he was no simply telling facts but taking real-life experiences and I really enjoyed it. In addition, during my first year, I had a very funny but interesting teacher, English teacher, kind of crazy, teaching us about market stocks... I really enjoyed my classes with him, same thing, he was INTERESTING, DYNAMIC. There are also other teachers that really great but I mean these two are REALLY nice to study with. The drawbacks of this university are that there is no organisation, we received the exams information less than one week before it started one time. Then, we normally have a referent teacher for each Parcours, I have NEVER seen mine in all my time at university, and I am not someone who misses classes a lot. I am disappointed about her because, I mean hopefully our Spanish teacher was here to inform us and help us not to miss some deadlines, important information... The biggest advantage of this university is that I had the opportunity to go for an Erasmus in the Czech Republic, for a semester and it was absolutely amazing, nothing bad to say about that, administrative persons were really reactive and efficient. The only little black point is that I basically applied to go to a university in Prague, and I was selected by BRNO. How was that possible? I don't know but I was determined to go, and I was right, it was amazing, I really recommend to all students to take the opportunities they are offered. Anyway, to sum up, this is a nice university, we don't have a huge amount of work to do, there is opportunities but you have to stay in touch with all going on and take as much opportunities as you can. Don't wait for your grades to arrive early because they will not. But enjoy and use the information transmitted by your teachers.
IÉSEG offers interactive teaching and international opportunities. I had the chance to go on an exchange to another country, which opened up new perspectives for me. The courses in Lille are stimulating, and the professors are very involved in our success.
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.
Nothing to show
