Sapienza – Università di Roma vs LUISS Business School vs Università di Roma Tor Vergata - uniroma2 vs Rome Business School vs Swiss School of Management - SSM

Side-by-side comparison from 237 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Sapienza – Università di Roma: wins 0/3 categories
LUISS Business School: wins 0/3 categories
Università di Roma Tor Vergata - uniroma2: wins 0/3 categories
Rome Business School: wins 0/3 categories
Swiss School of Management - SSM: wins 2/3 categories
John Cabot University: wins 1/3 categories
SHG Universities: wins 0/3 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Architecture
Best programme: Luxury Brand Management
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Arts and Culture Management
Best programme: Bachelor of Business Administration
Best programme: Economics
Lisbon, Portugal
5.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: International Hospitality Management
Category ratings
Facilities
3.63
4.17
3.88
4.16
4.67
5.00
Win
Not rated
Location
4.17
4.58
3.57
4.61
5.00
5.00
5.00
Professors
4.03
3.33
4.23
4.47
4.33
5.00
5.00
Internationality
3.87
3.58
4.30
4.75
5.00
5.00
5.00
Student life
3.78
3.25
3.80
4.23
4.33
Win
4.00
4.00
Value
4.04
3.17
4.20
4.34
5.00
4.00
5.00
Accommodation
3.34
2.92
3.32
3.76
5.00
Win
3.00
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Well-structured programs with relevant, real-world applications
  • +Knowledgeable and supportive professors fostering interactive learning
  • +International environment and ample opportunities for growth
  • +Strong career focus and job market alignment
  • +Caring professors and engaging learning experiences
  • +International environment and practical application
  • +Excellent career preparation and university reputation
  • +Modern facilities and enriching academic/personal growth opportunities
  • +Supportive environment, especially for international students
  • +Industry professional professors and real-world insights
  • +Holistic, practical curriculum and hands-on learning experiences
  • +Diverse global network and international exposure
  • +Practical, real-world preparation
  • +Personal and professional growth
  • +International experience
  • +Structured learning and international community
  • +Positive location and good opportunities
  • +Practice-oriented approach and practical application of skills
  • +International perspective and understanding of the industry
  • +Teachers as current specialists
Cons
  • -Administrative and organizational issues cause students to feel like a number.
  • -Outdated facilities and labs limit the quality of education and practical experience.
  • -Lack of preparation for the job market and unhelpful teaching staff are recurring concerns.
  • -Poor organization and low-level course content.
  • -Ineffective student coordination and support.
  • -Lack of planning and poor execution of program elements.
  • -Speedy courses with a lack of depth and outdated curriculum.
  • -Poor administrative support and unmotivated professors.
  • -Dilapidated and lacking infrastructure.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a major concern.
  • -The quality of education and course content is often disappointing.
  • -Students face issues with receiving promised services and fair treatment.
  • -Frustrating administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Lack of engaging and relevant curriculum.
  • -Administrative and management issues
  • -Outdated facilities and resources
  • -Lack of effective communication
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a consistent source of frustration.
  • -Students often complain about administrative inefficiency and poor communication.
  • -Course content is frequently perceived as irrelevant or not up-to-date.
Rating summary
What students say

Considering the provided ratings, this institution demonstrates particular strengths in **Location** and **Value**, both scoring above 4.0. Professors also receive a strong rating. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerges as the weakest area, scoring the lowest. Student life and internationality are rated moderately well, falling between the strongest and weakest aspects.

This university is distinguished by exceptional ratings in its **Location**, scoring an impressive 4.58. Its **Facilities** also received a strong evaluation at 4.17. Conversely, the university's weakest areas are **Accomodation**, rated at 2.92, and **Student Life**, with a score of 3.25. **Professors** and **Value** are moderately rated, while **Internationality** sits at a decent 3.58.

Internationality and Professors are the university's strongest rated areas. Conversely, Accomodation received the lowest score. Facilities, Student Life, and Value also demonstrate solid performance, while Location sits in the mid-range. The overall impression is one of a university excelling in academic and global aspects, with room for improvement in student housing.

This university presents a well-rounded profile, with exceptionally high marks for its **Internationality (4.75)** and **Location (4.61)**. Professors also received strong endorsements at **4.47**. The weakest area appears to be **Accomodation**, scoring **3.76**, though most other categories, including Student Life and Value, also scored well above average.

This institution boasts exceptional scores in several key areas, notably achieving perfect marks for **Location**, **Accomodation**, **Internationality**, and **Value**. The **Facilities** also stand out with a strong rating of 4.67. Areas showing slightly less consistent strength, though still positive, include **Professors** and **Student Life**, both rated at 4.33.

With exceptional scores in Facilities, Professors, Location, and Internationality, the university demonstrates considerable strengths. Student Life and Value also receive positive feedback, indicating a generally well-rounded experience. The primary area for improvement lies in Accomodation, which received the lowest rating.

With outstanding scores in several key areas, this institution shines in **Professors**, **Location**, and **Internationality**, all receiving perfect marks. Student life is also highly regarded, scoring a 4. Accommodations are rated a 3, representing a moderate aspect. The university's weakest area by a significant margin is **Facilities**, which received a score of 0. Overall, the value proposition is excellent, also rated a 5.

Reviews summary
Highlights

~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting well-structured programs, knowledgeable professors, and international opportunities. Negative feedback, representing ~4.8%, mentions disorganization and unengaging teaching.

With 5 out of 12 reviews being positive, students highlight smooth admissions, well-organized programs aligned with the job market, and an international environment. One review mentioned organizational gaps and a need for more versatile examples.

With an average rating of 4.18/5, ~84% of reviews are positive, highlighting comprehensive programs, excellent preparation, and modern facilities. A small portion (~4.6%) express concerns about rushed courses and lack of depth.

~92% of 53 reviews are positive, praising insightful professors and practical learning experiences. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions issues with diplomas, professional conduct, and website functionality.

All three reviews are overwhelmingly positive, awarding a perfect 5/5 rating. Students highlight the university's encouragement of creativity and practical, real-world business preparation. The international experience and the balance between theory and practice are also frequently praised.

Based on one review, the university receives a 4/5 rating. The program is praised for its structure and international community, though some opportunities may be less accessible than presented.

With a single review, the university has a perfect 5/5 rating. The feedback highlights a strong professional stage, theoretical and practical understanding of the industry, and a practice-oriented approach with current specialists.

Rating distribution
5★
28%
8%
41%
66%
100%
0%
100%
4★
48%
33%
43%
21%
0%
100%
0%
3★
20%
50%
11%
6%
0%
0%
0%
2★
5%
8%
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
2%
8%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
My University

I studied at the Sapienza University of Rome. I think it is one of the best Italian universities, among its strong points we have: prestigious professors and a super active student community. the negative point is that there are many students and sometimes they are difficult to follow everyone. Beyond this I recommend the university. I studied in the economics faculty and I must say that it is really well organised. there are numerous study rooms, laboratories and there is a canteen which allows students to eat good food for a few euros. Sapienza is today a point of reference in the Italian community for capable young graduates!

Very basic courses

The first half of the year the program is very basic, this is done in hopes of having all students with the same base knowledge but unfortunately, students with a business/economics background have no engagement or academic challenge as these courses cover the introduction of management courses very briefly.

Global Governance qualities given to UNIRoma2

The University of Rome tor Vergata is a great and relevantly young University, which is becoming each academic year stronger and more valuable. I graduated from the Global Governance bachelor's degree in English which presented a very interdisciplinary, interconnected and international programme to its students. It is focused on the great challenges and relevant matters of nowadays' world, which shape a strong basis for the next generations of workers and leaders of the upcoming years.

RBS Business Simulation Game Experience.

Participating in the Business Simulation Game as part of my MBA at Rome Business School was one of the most practical and impactful experiences of the program, It provided a realistic environment to test strategic decision making under pressure and highlighted the strong interdependence between market dynamics, operational performance, cost discipline, people management, pricing strategy and profitability.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close