EADA Business School vs EU Business School vs GBSB Global Business School vs Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona - UAB vs Universitat CEU Abat Oliba - CEU UAO
Side-by-side comparison from 767 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Diverse, international community and networking opportunities
- +Strong academic programs with practical business applications
- +Positive personal and professional development experiences
- +Helpful professors and career support
- +Valuable practical and theoretical business knowledge
- +Enriching overall student experience
- +Balanced academic theory with practical, real-world application
- +Knowledgeable, passionate, and engaged lecturers
- +Strong community and international atmosphere
- +Supportive and approachable professors.
- +Pleasant campus and good university environment.
- +Accessible resources and helpful staff.
- +Excellent organization and clear, accessible courses.
- +Supportive staff and personalized academic attention.
- +Modern facilities and diverse international opportunities.
- +Supportive and knowledgeable lecturers
- +Practical and well-structured courses
- +Welcoming and diverse international environment
- +International environment and diverse perspectives
- +Practical application of neuroscience to business challenges
- +Engaging and insightful learning with relevant skills
- -- Lack of effective career services and job placement support.
- -- Inconsistent quality of teaching staff and arbitrary grading.
- -- Administrative inflexibility and poor communication regarding program logistics.
- -Administrative and management issues cause disorganization and lack of support.
- -Outdated facilities and a focus on attendance over quality education are criticized.
- -The educational program is perceived as basic and unaccredited in some regions.
- -Poor academic quality and lack of practical value in degrees.
- -Administrative and organizational issues with limited student support.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and outdated or inadequate facilities.
- -Poor teaching quality and lack of student support from faculty.
- -Substandard facilities, including issues with housing and wifi.
- -Inadequate educational content and inconsistent academic rigor.
- -Poor leadership and unprofessional management are prevalent.
- -Ineffective teaching quality due to unqualified instructors is a significant problem.
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor internship support and disregard for student complaints.
- -Inconsistent staff helpfulness and attitude.
- -Students dislike the administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are a major concern.
- -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant and poorly delivered.
This university garners particularly high marks for its Location, with a near-perfect score. Student Life and Internationality also stand out as strong areas. Among the lower-scoring categories, Accommodations received the least favorable rating, followed by Facilities. Overall, the university demonstrates a positive reception across most assessed aspects.
This institution excels in several key areas, with Location and Internationality receiving the highest marks at 4.73. Student Life also scores well at 4.22. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, scoring 3.42, suggesting room for improvement. Facilities and Professors are rated consistently around 4.04, while Value sits at a respectable 3.87.
This institution shines brightest in its **internationality**, boasting a near-perfect score. **Location** is another significant strength, highly valued by students. Conversely, **accommodation** presents the most significant area for improvement, receiving the lowest rating. Other aspects like **professors** and **student life** are well-regarded, while **facilities** and **value** fall within the mid-range.
Student life stands out as a significant strength, receiving the highest rating. Accommodation presents the weakest area for the institution. Other rated aspects, including facilities, internationality, and value, also garnered favorable scores, indicating a generally positive university experience.
This university garners excellent scores across most aspects. Accommodations stand out as the strongest area, receiving a high rating of 4.5. Facilities and Professors are also rated highly at 4.14. Location, Student Life, Internationality, and Value all received a solid score of 4. This indicates a well-rounded institution with particular strengths in student living arrangements and academic personnel.
Academic and international aspects of the university are highly regarded, with Professors receiving an exceptional score of 4.63 and Internationality a strong 4.56. Location and Value also perform well, both exceeding 4.3. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, scoring 3.69. Facilities and Student Life are rated moderately well, around 4.05 and 4.32 respectively.
Overall, the university receives very positive feedback, with exceptional scores in value (5), professors (4.875), and internationality (4.875). Facilities and student life are also highly rated at 4.857. The weakest area identified is accommodation, scoring 4.285, though still a solid rating. Location also scores well at 4.667.
Around 97.6% of reviews are positive, highlighting a multicultural environment, practical learning, and strong networking. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions issues with career services and administrative rigidity.
Around 74% of reviews are positive, praising professors, career services, and valuable skills gained. The remaining ~7.6% of feedback expresses concerns about disorganization and the quality of education.
Around 74% of reviews are positive, praising the community, practical curriculum, and knowledgeable lecturers. Some negative feedback, ~13%, points to administrative issues and inconsistent academic quality.
With ~79% positive ratings, students praise supportive professors, great campus environments, and accessible resources. A small percentage of reviews mention poor teaching quality and inadequate faculty feedback.
University reviews are predominantly positive (~75%), highlighting excellent academic environments, helpful staff, and good organization. One reviewer mentioned unprofessional director and unqualified staff.
With an average rating of 4.58/5 from 43 reviews, ~93% are positive, highlighting supportive, knowledgeable lecturers, practical courses, and a welcoming, multicultural environment. A small ~4.7% of feedback expressed dissatisfaction with staff consistency and internship support.
All ten reviews are positive, with students praising the program's international environment and practical application of neuroscience to business. They highlight the valuable knowledge gained, career impact, and engaging classes.
In my experience, this business school is considerably more hyped than the actual value it delivers. While the marketing and reputation may create high expectations, the learning experience often falls short. One of the biggest concerns is the lack of placement support. Students are largely expected to manage their career opportunities on their own, which can be disappointing given the investment made in the program. Academically, many subjects are covered only at a surface level. The curriculum tends to focus on providing a broad overview rather than developing deep understanding or practical expertise. Most topics are wrapped up in just one or two classes, which is rarely enough to gain meaningful knowledge or build strong skills. As a result, students are often left to do significant self-learning if they want to truly understand the material. While the school introduces a wide range of business concepts, it doesn't always provide the depth, rigour, or hands-on learning that many students expect from a quality business education. Overall, I found the institution to be somewhat overrated, with the reputation and hype exceeding the actual learning outcomes and career support provided.
As far as universities go I think EU business school comes first in terms of student-staff relationship. Every member of the staff I have encountered has been more than helpful. What i think should improve as even tho its not connected to my previous point is I think the school should have more leniency towards tuition payment specially to international students because we are here despite the challenges of having to find willing banks to exchange local currencies to Euros.
The overall experience was ok. Yet I dont feel that it was worth 10k€ a year for what I received. Starting from repetitive classes in each year but with a different name until not having bathrooms for almost 6 months. The quality of the majority of classes was 2/5. The content of the classes was not deep enough to teach you about tools, appliances, ways of solving, what should be taken into consideration. On my 2 last years. I took the exact same class of public relations but named differently. Not even the professor knew what to say any more. I didn’t saw not event one tool that is used in public relations. We analyzed just one case of public relations in the whole semester. And it was a mention not event a full analysis. I do not recommend GBSB. The internships they say the help you with on their webpage its a lie. They do not help you in any way to connect you with no company. They are not event informed in how to help you with the visa.
I studied tourism at UAB for one semester in 2022. I was supposed to stay for a full year, but my experience wasn't good and I left after the first semester. First of all, the housing area (Villa universitária) has mold. I was sick constantly during my exhange and went through multiple respiratory infections. I also had almost daily headaches and a very painful and strong cough. All of this eased after a couple weeks once I returned to my home country. Other exhange students told me about having the same issues and some noticed mold in their apartment walls. The housing area at times is very unsave and not controlled properly. The tourism faculty is located in the same building with the housing area reception. Therefore, it was very excluded from the rest of the campus. That's why, I didn't really get to use any of the services offered at the campus or get a real university experience. UAB also has a medical centre for "all students" according to their website, yet this doesn't include tourism students. I was turned away from the centre despite being extremely sick once they heard I study tourism at the school. The classes focused more on remembering as much information as you can to pass the exam, rather than focusing on understanding, critical thinking etc. The teachers were very often late to classes, they felt very unmotivated and I received very little feedback. In short, I do not recommend UAB. My experience was a loss of money and time.
Nothing to show
C3S is a very good Institution for International Students. The lecturers here are so enthusiastic and truly passionate about their subjects; their knowledge and encouragement make me feel ready for my future career. At C3S, I really felt like I belonged; the diversity is incredible, and everyone is genuinely kind. Plus, the support systems are really strong. The courses are top-notch, and the learning experience really sets you up for great career opportunities.
The classes are so intresting I love how they they teach you about psychology and business strategy, I really like how the teachers are real professionals in terms of marketing , buisness... overall I really enjoy it.
