SKEMA Business School vs Rhodes University - RU vs North-West University - NWU vs Central University of Technology, Free State - CUT vs Center for Creative Leadership

Side-by-side comparison from 607 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Center for Creative Leadership (5.00)
SKEMA Business School: wins 0/5 categories
Rhodes University - RU: wins 0/5 categories
North-West University - NWU: wins 0/5 categories
Central University of Technology, Free State - CUT: wins 0/5 categories
Center for Creative Leadership: wins 3/5 categories
i_Xperience: wins 2/5 categories
STADIO: wins 0/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Supply Chain Management
Grahamstown, South Africa
4.40
Read more reviews
26 reviews
×
Best programme: Arts
Potchefstroom, South Africa
4.40
Read more reviews
414 reviews
×
Best programme: Economics
Best programme: Information Technology
Best programme: Psychology of Human Resources Development
Cape Town, South Africa
4.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Economics and Computer Science
Johannesburg, South Africa
4.20
Read more reviews
11 reviews
×
Best programme: Education
Category ratings
Facilities
4.21
4.00
4.27
4.39
5.00
5.00
3.57
Location
4.25
3.40
4.11
4.50
5.00
Win
4.00
4.30
Professors
4.42
4.42
4.21
4.20
5.00
Win
4.00
3.91
Internationality
4.37
4.31
3.96
3.95
4.00
5.00
Win
4.00
Student life
4.10
4.12
4.20
4.18
5.00
5.00
3.20
Value
4.04
4.50
4.38
4.10
5.00
Win
3.00
4.45
Accommodation
3.57
3.76
3.84
3.72
3.00
4.00
Win
2.71
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong international exposure and campus network
  • +Practical, up-to-date curriculum with business application
  • +Valuable career support and alumni network
  • +Supportive administration and lecturers
  • +Engaged learning and academic development
  • +Inclusive culture and vibrant campus life
  • +Excellent support services and helpful faculty
  • +Vibrant and organized campus life with social activities
  • +Beautiful campus environment conducive to study
  • +Supportive and approachable lecturers
  • +Practical, hands-on learning and industry connections
  • +Welcoming and engaging campus environment
  • +Student-centered support and inclusivity
  • +Welcoming and understanding community
  • +Welcoming atmosphere and timely graduation
  • +Reliable student services
  • +Calm and positive environment
  • +Supportive and dedicated lecturers.
  • +Practical learning experiences and diverse showcases.
  • +Smooth and hassle-free administrative processes.
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues disrupt academic progress.
  • -Poor communication and guidance hinder student career goals.
  • -Concerns exist regarding faculty conduct and focus on profit over education.
  • -Administrative and management issues negatively impact student experience.
  • -Some lecturers are disengaged and prioritize their own research.
  • -Outdated infrastructure and limited support services cause significant problems.
  • -Lack of practical experience and career preparation.
  • -Administrative and management issues, with a focus on targets over academics.
  • -Language barriers making academic engagement difficult.
  • -Persistent accommodation problems and administrative errors with marks.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Facilities are often described as outdated or poorly maintained.
  • -Course content is perceived as irrelevant or not up-to-date.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a common complaint.
  • -The curriculum and teaching methods are often perceived as ineffective.
  • -Overpriced tuition and fees.
  • -Inadequate resources and support.
  • -Poorly maintained facilities.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution shows impressive strengths in its academic and international components, with Professors receiving a high rating of 4.42 and Internationality scoring 4.37. Location and Facilities are also well-regarded, both above 4.20. However, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, with a score of 3.57, significantly lower than other categories. Student Life and Value are rated moderately, around 4.10 and 4.04 respectively.

Academic offerings and global engagement are clear strengths, with Professors and Internationality receiving high marks. Value also stands out as a significant positive. Conversely, Location is the lowest-rated aspect, suggesting this could be an area for improvement. Facilities and Student Life are generally well-regarded, as is Accomodation.

This institution demonstrates strong performance in several key areas. Value for money stands out with the highest rating, closely followed by excellent Facilities. Student Life and Professors also receive commendably high scores. Conversely, Accomodation presents the lowest rating among the surveyed categories, with Internationality also scoring moderately lower than the top-performing metrics.

This university scores exceptionally well in **Location (4.5)** and **Facilities (4.39)**, indicating these are its strongest aspects. Student life, professors, and value also receive solid ratings. The **Accomodation (3.72)** is the lowest-rated area, suggesting room for improvement, while Internationality also falls slightly below the average of other categories.

This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths, with perfect scores awarded for Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, and Value. These areas represent the university's most outstanding attributes. The accommodation rating of 3 indicates a moderate but not exceptional aspect of the student experience. Internationality also scores well at 4, suggesting a generally welcoming environment for global students.

An excellent student experience is evident, with top marks awarded for Facilities and Student Life, alongside high scores for Internationality. The university also performs well in terms of Professors and Accomodation. Its weakest area, according to these ratings, is Value, which received a moderate score. Location also garnered a good but not outstanding rating.

This institution demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly in its **Value** and **Location**, both receiving excellent scores. The **Internationality** of the student body is also highly rated. Conversely, **Accomodation** is the weakest area, with a significantly lower score compared to other aspects. **Student Life** and **Facilities** also present opportunities for improvement, while **Professors** are well-regarded.

Reviews summary
Highlights

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~90%), highlighting great faculty, strong international opportunities, and practical curriculum beneficial for careers. A small percentage (~3%) reported issues with management, communication, and program organization.

Most students praise Rhodes University's quick administration, supportive lecturers, and vibrant culture. A small percentage noted concerns with specific departments, lecturer focus, or infrastructure like water cuts.

With a 4.37/5 average rating from 414 reviews, nearly all feedback is positive, highlighting beautiful campuses, vibrant student life, and helpful support services. Very minimal negative feedback exists.

With a 4.3/5 average rating and ~85% positive feedback, students praise hands-on learning, supportive lecturers, and engaging campus life. A small amount of feedback (~5%) mentioned issues with online registration and accommodation.

With one review, the university is highly rated at 5/5. This positive feedback highlights excellent student care and a welcoming environment. No negative reviews were received.

The single review indicates a positive experience, with a ~100% positive sentiment. Students highlight a calm and welcoming atmosphere, reliable services, and timely graduation.

With an average rating of 4.18/5, ~74% of reviews are positive, praising lecturer support, practical experience, and a smooth administrative process. There is no negative feedback.

Rating distribution
5★
49%
58%
49%
55%
100%
0%
45%
4★
43%
31%
39%
30%
0%
100%
27%
3★
7%
8%
11%
10%
0%
0%
27%
2★
1%
4%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
1%
0%
0%
5%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Experience in School

My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.

Nothing to show

Amazing

NWU helps unlock students potentials. I came here as a shy person, in less than 2 years I'm a completely different person . More confidence, I am more focused , more motivated and so much more .it's a worthwhile experience being here .

I'm doing Environmental health science currently

It's actually a nice university, it has more opportunities and usually give their students experience that they are gonna need in their professional field. I like almost everything about it ,the events and activities provided to learners 😊. Our lectures are very friendly and real good when it comes to doing their job and they offer more study materials for learners to be able to understand their work.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Better than Most

I attended Stadio with hesitance - I had really been hoping to attend a more mainstream university like WITS or UJ - but I got all that and more with Stadio. The lecturers are the best, nothing compares to their intellect and interest in their respective fields. There are, admittedly, certain issues with admin (it may be an uncommon issue) But, like I said - excellent lecturers, great quality content to learn, and simply an overall enjoyable experience to be able to attend Stadio.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close