University of Toronto - UofT vs University of Sunderland vs Algonquin College vs Sheridan College vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris

Side-by-side comparison from 493 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: General Assembly (5.00)
University of Toronto - UofT: wins 0/7 categories
University of Sunderland: wins 0/7 categories
Algonquin College: wins 0/7 categories
Sheridan College: wins 0/7 categories
Le Cordon Bleu Paris: wins 2/7 categories
General Assembly: wins 4/7 categories
RUBIKA: wins 1/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Psychology
Sunderland, The United Kingdom
4.20
Read more reviews
63 reviews
×
Best programme: Business and Management
Ottawa, Canada
4.20
Read more reviews
60 reviews
×
Best programme: Aeronautics and Space Technology
Oakville, Ontario, Canada
4.20
Read more reviews
42 reviews
×
Best programme: Film
Best programme: Culinary Arts
New York City, United States
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Marketing
Valenciennes, France
4.40
Read more reviews
14 reviews
×
Best programme: 2D Animation
Category ratings
Facilities
4.19
4.52
4.10
4.30
4.50
5.00
Win
4.43
Location
4.37
4.15
4.25
4.33
4.75
5.00
Win
3.14
Professors
4.14
4.44
4.22
4.29
4.63
Win
4.00
4.29
Internationality
4.42
4.24
3.98
4.00
4.63
Win
3.00
3.93
Student life
3.80
4.07
3.89
3.98
3.88
5.00
Win
4.14
Value
4.24
4.16
4.28
4.19
4.13
4.00
4.64
Win
Accommodation
3.83
3.75
3.74
3.85
3.00
5.00
Win
4.29
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Prestigious reputation and strong academic programs
  • +Vibrant campus life and community building
  • +Excellent networking opportunities and career development
  • +Practical, UK-standard curriculum with critical thinking focus
  • +Supportive, knowledgeable, and accessible faculty
  • +Welcoming and supportive environment for international students
  • +Practical, real-world relevant courses
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable instructors
  • +Modern facilities and student support
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable professors
  • +Practical, real-world focused programs
  • +Welcoming and helpful student services
  • +Exceptional chef instructors and curriculum quality.
  • +Strong emphasis on skill development and practical experience.
  • +Valuable international reputation and alumni network.
  • +Knowledgeable, supportive professors
  • +Abundant study resources and learning activities
  • +Networking opportunities
  • +Practical project-based learning for career readiness
  • +Supportive instructors from industry
  • +Positive school environment and student well-being focus
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues lead to understaffed services and long wait times.
  • -Teaching quality is inconsistent, with an overemphasis on research and memorization over practical learning.
  • -Lack of adequate career resources and limited opportunities hinder student advancement.
  • -Insufficient lecturers and inadequate course delivery
  • -Administrative and management issues
  • -Unclear communication and lack of student involvement
  • -Students dislike excessive fees and lack of value for money.
  • -The college struggles with ineffective online learning and unprepared faculty.
  • -Administrative and departmental support is often unhelpful and inflexible.
  • -Poor administrative and customer service.
  • -Declining program quality and instructor expertise.
  • -Lack of employer recognition and career prospects.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment.
  • -Poor communication and administrative support.
  • -Lack of practical application and relevance in coursework.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources.
  • -Poor communication and administrative issues.
  • -Lack of practical application and relevant curriculum.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a recurring problem.
  • -Teaching quality and course content are often found to be lacking.
Rating summary
What students say

Internationality stands out as the highest-rated aspect of the university. Location and Value also received very positive scores. Conversely, Student Life registered as the lowest-rated area. Accommodations and Professors received moderate to good ratings, indicating a generally positive but not exceptional experience in these categories.

This university demonstrates considerable strengths in its **facilities**, scoring a high 4.52. **Professors** also receive positive recognition with a rating of 4.44. Areas that could benefit from further development include **accommodation**, which received the lowest rating at 3.75. Overall, the university presents a generally favorable image with solid scores in location, student life, internationality, and value.

Overall, the university receives strong evaluations, with its **Value** being the highest rated aspect at 4.28. **Professors** and **Location** also score very well. Conversely, **Accomodation** received the lowest rating among the surveyed categories at 3.74, indicating room for improvement in this area. Student Life and Facilities also fall slightly below the highest-rated metrics.

The university excels in its facilities, location, and professors, all receiving high marks. Student life and accommodation represent areas for potential improvement, showing the lowest scores among the surveyed categories. Internationality and value for money are also rated positively, indicating a solid overall offering.

Performance varies across key aspects of university life. Outstanding ratings were awarded for Location (4.75) and Professors (4.625), alongside strong marks for Internationality (4.625) and Facilities (4.5). Student Life (3.875) and Value (4.125) received good scores. Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.

Overall, this institution garners strong commendations, particularly excelling in its facilities, location, student life, and accommodation, all receiving perfect scores. Professors and perceived value also score well, indicating solid academic and financial offerings. The weakest area identified is internationality, suggesting room for growth in attracting and supporting a global student body.

Overall, this institution excels in areas concerning financial benefit and campus resources. With an impressive **4.64**, "Value" stands out as the highest-rated aspect, closely followed by "Facilities" at **4.43**. Conversely, "Location" received the lowest score at **3.14**, indicating it's the weakest area. Other strong points include "Accomodation" and "Professors," both scoring **4.29**.

Reviews summary
Highlights

~85% of reviews are positive, highlighting prestigious academics, strong networking, and campus life. A small minority (~1.6%) cite issues with student services and teaching quality.

With a ~84% positive sentiment, students highlight valuable experiences, practical skills, and supportive lecturers. A small fraction (~1.6%) of reviews noted insufficient lecturers or a course not meeting expectations.

The vast majority of ~95% of reviews are positive, highlighting well-structured, practical courses, supportive instructors, and useful skill development. A small minority (~5%) mentioned concerns about cost, online learning effectiveness, and administrative coordination.

~93% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable professors, practical courses, and supportive services. A small percentage (~7%) express dissatisfaction with service wait times and program quality.

All eight student reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.63/5. Students highly praise the knowledgeable instructors, quality curriculum, and enriching learning experience.

With a single review, this university is rated a perfect 5/5. The student highlighted excellent professors and abundant study resources. No negative feedback was received.

Reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~93% of feedback) with an average rating of 4.36/5. Students highlight excellent, industry-professional instructors, a focus on project-based learning, and supportive environments.

Rating distribution
5★
37%
41%
32%
48%
63%
100%
43%
4★
48%
43%
58%
36%
38%
0%
50%
3★
13%
14%
5%
10%
0%
0%
7%
2★
1%
2%
5%
2%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
5%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
PhD Psyc

The program itself is great and really prepares you for an academic career, but the quality of the supervisors varies a lot. Some people in the department are excellent and enjoy empowering their students, but the majority of profs make you feel like they're doing you a favour by giving you their time of day/guidance. Might be an issue exclusively with this department, but still. And the campus is cool! Great cheap eats around. Shout out to El Rey for when you want to splurge a bit and get some awesome tacos!

Nothing to show

Multicultural Workspace

As an international student, I had a great experience studying at Algonquin University. The faculty and staff were incredibly supportive and made me feel welcome from the moment I arrived on campus. The university also provided me with numerous resources to help me adjust to life in a new country, such as language classes and cultural events. The quality of education at Algonquin University is exceptional, and I found the courses to be challenging yet engaging. The professors were knowledgeable and passionate about their subjects, and I appreciated the practical, hands-on approach to learning. The campus itself is beautiful and well-maintained, with modern facilities and a wide range of amenities. There are also plenty of opportunities to get involved in extracurricular activities and meet other students, which helped me feel more connected to the university community. Overall, I would highly recommend Algonquin University to any international student looking for a top-notch education and a supportive, welcoming environment.

Environment

Its environment is excellent, but I need more than some strategies for grouping students. In some semesters, the professors ask the students to create their own groups for assignments. The students create their groups based on their geographical, linguistic, and religious categories, and the issue of diversity and inclusion is not considered. Sometimes, intelligent students form their own groups, and the issue of transparency in scoring becomes pale. I suggest the groups should be created by professors, because they know well and can balance their students in good and useful groups.

Student in 2013

I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close