University of Toronto - UofT vs University of Sunderland vs University of British Columbia vs University Canada West - UCW vs University of Guelph
Side-by-side comparison from 699 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +World-class professors and strong academic focus
- +Prestigious reputation and excellent networking opportunities
- +Welcoming campus environment and vibrant community life
- +Practical, UK-standard curriculum with critical thinking focus
- +Supportive, knowledgeable, and accessible faculty
- +Welcoming and supportive environment for international students
- +Excellent professors and engaging courses
- +Valuable career preparation and practical learning opportunities
- +Abundant resources, study spaces, and campus support services
- +Practical, job-market relevant programs with experienced faculty
- +Diverse environment fostering adaptability and confidence
- +Affordable tuition and flexible scheduling
- +Welcoming community and friendly atmosphere
- +Strong academics and diverse course offerings
- +Valuable co-op and varsity sports programs
- +exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable, approachable instructors
- +strong emphasis on precision, quality, and professional skill development
- +welcoming environment and supportive alumni network
- +Industry-active instructors and professional preparation
- +Supportive and welcoming atmosphere
- +Emphasis on practical, project-based learning
- -Administrative and management issues cause long wait times and understaffed services.
- -Teaching quality is inconsistent, with a focus on research over student learning experiences.
- -Limited career opportunities and a lack of sufficient academic and personal support resources exist.
- -Insufficient lecturers and inadequate course delivery
- -Administrative and management issues
- -Unclear communication and lack of student involvement
- -Administrative & course selection issues are frustrating.
- -Social life can feel superficial and exclusive.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality, with some professors subpar.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of essential resources are frequently mentioned.
- -Students express dissatisfaction with the quality of teaching and curriculum.
- -Program specialization not aligning with student expectations.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of career support and industry relevance leads to dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Facilities are frequently described as outdated and in poor condition.
- -Teaching quality and curriculum relevance are inconsistent and often disappointing.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strength in its internationality, boasting a high rating of 4.415. Its location also received a notable score of 4.374. The university offers good value and solid facilities and professor quality. Conversely, student life and accommodation present the weakest areas, with ratings of 3.795 and 3.836 respectively.
This university demonstrates considerable strengths in its **facilities**, scoring a high 4.52. **Professors** also receive positive recognition with a rating of 4.44. Areas that could benefit from further development include **accommodation**, which received the lowest rating at 3.75. Overall, the university presents a generally favorable image with solid scores in location, student life, internationality, and value.
This institution's surveyed areas reveal a mixed performance. The strongest aspects are Location, scoring 4.45, closely followed by Internationality at 4.35 and Student Life at 4.31. Facilities also received a commendable 4.22 rating. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, with a score of 3.86, while Professors and Value fall within the mid-range.
This university presents a generally positive profile, with its **location** standing out as the strongest area, achieving a perfect 4.5. **Internationality** and **facilities** also received high marks. Conversely, **accommodation** represents the weakest aspect, with a significantly lower rating. Other categories like professors, student life, and value fall within a respectable range, indicating a well-rounded but not perfect student experience.
This institution garners particularly strong feedback for its **Student Life**, scoring 4.39, closely followed by its **Facilities** at 4.35 and **Accomodation** at 4.17. Conversely, **Internationality** is its lowest-rated aspect, with a score of 3.71. Other areas such as Professors, Location, and Value also received solid, above-average ratings.
This institution receives high marks for its Location, scoring 4.78, and for its Professors and Internationality, both at 4.67. Facilities also rate well at 4.56. Student Life and Value are both solid at 4.00. The weakest area is Accomodation, which received a rating of 3.22.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its **Value** (4.67) and **Facilities** (4.47), indicating high satisfaction in these key areas. **Accomodation** (4.33) and **Student Life** (4.20) also received positive scores. However, the university's **Location** (3.13) stands out as a comparatively weaker aspect, with **Internationality** (3.87) also receiving a moderate rating.
Approximately 84% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong academics, research focus, and networking opportunities. Just ~1.6% of feedback is negative, with brief mentions of a fast pace and less emphasis on student services.
With a ~84% positive sentiment, students highlight valuable experiences, practical skills, and supportive lecturers. A small fraction (~1.6%) of reviews noted insufficient lecturers or a course not meeting expectations.
With 4.23/5 stars from 191 reviews, approximately 74% of feedback is positive, highlighting strong academics, professors, and resources. Negative feedback, representing about 1.1%, mentions course selection difficulties and inconsistent professor quality.
Overwhelmingly positive feedback (~100% of reviews) highlights practical, fast-paced programs and experienced professors. Students value academic and professional growth, strong analytical skills, and a diverse environment. No negative reviews were provided.
Overwhelmingly positive feedback (~99%) highlights great academics, a friendly environment, and community feel. A small amount of negative feedback (~1%) points to program specificity.
All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlight exceptional teaching quality and knowledgeable instructors, along with impeccable facilities. The curriculum and emphasis on precision are frequently praised.
With a 4.4/5 average rating from 15 reviews, ~93% are positive. Students praise quality teaching from industry professionals and a supportive, welcoming atmosphere. The heavy workload and project-focused curriculum prepare them well for professional careers.
The program itself is great and really prepares you for an academic career, but the quality of the supervisors varies a lot. Some people in the department are excellent and enjoy empowering their students, but the majority of profs make you feel like they're doing you a favour by giving you their time of day/guidance. Might be an issue exclusively with this department, but still. And the campus is cool! Great cheap eats around. Shout out to El Rey for when you want to splurge a bit and get some awesome tacos!
Nothing to show
I was there as an exchange student from Europe, attending classes at Sauder Business School and the Mechanical Engineering Department. Studying at UBC is definitely a mixed bag in terms of the quality of education. I did have a few great professors who held wonderfully challenging and well-thought-out classes, making me feel that UBC punches above its weight in terms of educational quality. However, some other lectures were undoubtedly subpar. Grading seemed quite arbitrary at times (moving goalposts seems to be a recurring theme at UBC), and the lectures were not nearly as good as they should have been, in my opinion. It is quite fair to say that other exchange students and I were often shocked that UBC allows these courses to occur annually without making efforts to improve them. At UBC as a whole, less is expected from students than at my home university. I've seen people never show up to class and hold presentations that would never fly at my home uni. Professors seems to welcome all questions even if they are about things a fourth-year engineering student just months before graduation needs to know. I am not sure if UBC ensures that its graduates are adequately educated, and would definitely think twice if I was a recruiter and had to hire someone who attented there. From what I have seen, I would tentatively recommend Sauder Business School. For Mechanical Engineering (and probably also Electrical and Civil Engineering), UBC is simply too small, offering a lack of choices and not many lectures; usually, only introductory courses are offered for most topics. I recommend attending a more engineering/science-focused university, such as Waterloo or others in the US or Europe. It is quite astonishing how much money people pay to attend these subpar classes. Enjoyed having a beach on campus.
You can study and get a degree here, but the university in itself cares little about students and does very little to help when needed. Guidelines are very vague and facilities are not built for as many students as are accepted.
The University of Guelph is great for several reasons. The campus is very nice and well-maintained with a variety of delicious food options for everyone. There are plenty of opportunities to get involved on campus regardless of program or interest, and the people running those programs are extremely welcoming. There are also many job opportunities on campus for students. Overall, the campus life and social aspect of the University is amazing. As for classes and professors, the majority of my review is positive. I had some great classes and some great professors, however, I found many to be teaching just for the sake of it, reading off slides, and hardly engaging with students. Furthermore, I felt some classes were unnecessary for my program, and my time could've gone elsewhere. The classes for my program were mostly applicable and useful, however some felt like a waste of time. Overall, the University is amazing, and I would highly recommend it to anyone considering it for their undergrad, wanting to meet people, and really make the most of their time at school.
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
Nothing to show
