SKEMA Business School vs Hochschule Fresenius vs Thunderbird School of Global Management vs Columbia University vs University of Illinois Springfield - UIS

Side-by-side comparison from 234 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Thunderbird School of Global Management (5.00)
SKEMA Business School: wins 0/6 categories
Hochschule Fresenius: wins 0/6 categories
Thunderbird School of Global Management: wins 5/6 categories
Columbia University: wins 0/6 categories
University of Illinois Springfield - UIS: wins 0/6 categories
INSEEC Business School: wins 0/6 categories
Schiller International University: wins 1/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Supply Chain Management
Idstein, Germany
4.30
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Economics
Glendale, California, United States
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Master in International Business
New York City, United States
4.40
Read more reviews
73 reviews
×
Best programme: Art and Design
Springfield, Illinois, United States
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Digital Marketing
Tampa, Florida, United States
4.50
Read more reviews
12 reviews
×
Best programme: BA International Relations and Diplomacy
Category ratings
Facilities
4.21
3.67
5.00
Win
4.49
Not rated
3.43
3.83
Location
4.24
5.00
5.00
4.36
Not rated
4.64
4.92
Professors
4.41
4.00
4.00
4.37
Not rated
3.86
4.58
Win
Internationality
4.35
3.67
5.00
Win
4.44
Not rated
4.50
4.92
Student life
4.10
3.33
5.00
Win
4.35
Not rated
4.07
4.08
Value
4.03
4.00
5.00
Win
4.44
Not rated
3.64
4.17
Accommodation
3.56
3.00
5.00
Win
4.22
Not rated
2.50
3.67
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Practical, hands-on application of skills in business contexts
  • +Relevant, up-to-date curriculum with industry-experienced professors
  • +International experience and career support
  • +Relevant and varied course content
  • +Helpful and educated faculty
  • +Supportive university staff
  • +Diverse international exposure and cultural learning
  • +Vibrant student life and wide range of clubs
  • +Supportive and passionate faculty
  • +Diverse and thoughtful food options
  • +Affordable and accessible accommodation

Nothing to show

  • +Practical, group-focused learning and professional initiation.
  • +High-quality teaching and supportive faculty mentorship.
  • +Strong professional network and vibrant student life.
  • +Strong academic programs and supportive instructors
  • +Opportunities for international exposure and cultural immersion
  • +Practical experience and career advancement support
Cons
  • -Poor communication and guidance from administration and faculty.
  • -Disorganized program management and overwhelming course loads.
  • -Concerns about faculty behavior and the school's financial focus over student well-being.
  • -Lack of organization and clear communication from administration.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
  • -Uninspiring teaching methods and irrelevant curriculum.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are prevalent.
  • -Lack of resources and support hinders learning.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are major drawbacks.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from instructors is a recurring problem.

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
  • -Lack of student support and responsiveness from administration.
  • -Uninspiring curriculum and teaching methods.
  • -Limited extracurriculars and career opportunities for early students.
  • -Poor campus environment and lack of engagement.
Rating summary
What students say

The university demonstrates notable strengths in its teaching staff, receiving a high rating for professors. Internationality and location also received positive scores, indicating strong performance in these areas. However, accommodation presents a weaker point, with a significantly lower rating compared to other aspects. Overall, student life, facilities, and value for money are rated reasonably well.

With a perfect score of 5, location stands out as the university's strongest asset. Student life, however, received the lowest rating at 3.33. Facilities and internationality scored a respectable 3.67, while professors and value were rated highly at 4. Accommodations were rated at 3.

Across all surveyed categories, this institution demonstrates remarkable strengths. It excels particularly in its facilities, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value, each receiving a perfect score. The weakest area, though still strong, is the rating for professors, which stands at a solid 4. This indicates a highly positive and well-rounded university experience.

An analysis of the provided ratings reveals a university that excels in several key areas. Facilities stand out with a score of 4.49, closely followed by Internationality and Value, both receiving 4.44. Professors and Location also score highly at 4.37. Student Life is rated well at 4.35. The lowest rated aspect is Accomodation, with a score of 4.22, suggesting this is an area for potential improvement.

Nothing to show

This university demonstrates notable strengths in its **Location**, receiving a high rating of 4.64. **Student Life** and **Internationality** are also well-regarded. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower score of 2.5. Other aspects like **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Value** fall within a moderate to good range.

Considerable acclaim has been received across multiple university aspects. The institution excels particularly in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring an impressive 4.92. **Professors** also garnered high marks at 4.58. Conversely, the **Accomodation** received the lowest rating at 3.67, with **Facilities** also being a relative weakness at 3.83. **Student Life** and **Value** scored moderately well.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4.34 average rating from 132 reviews, ~90% are positive, highlighting practical AI and marketing curricula, and international experiences. A small ~3% of negative feedback mentions poor management and communication.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%) with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise course content, helpful lecturers, and good accommodation. A few minor criticisms mention strict grading in one course and occasional unhelpful teachers.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this university is highly praised. The lone review highlights a great intercultural learning experience and vibrant student life.

University feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~99%), with students praising the engaging academics and passionate professors. Some mention food variety and accommodation limitations.

Nothing to show

Most student feedback is positive (~63% 4-5 stars), highlighting excellent pedagogy, practical experiences, and supportive staff. The average rating is 3.81/5, with no negative reviews.

With an average rating of 4.5/5 based on 12 reviews, approximately 92% of feedback is positive, highlighting independent learning opportunities, practical professors, and a good study abroad experience. A small portion (~8%) of reviews express dissatisfaction with limited extracurriculars and job opportunities.

Rating distribution
5★
49%
33%
100%
42%
0%
21%
67%
4★
42%
67%
0%
52%
0%
50%
25%
3★
7%
0%
0%
5%
0%
43%
0%
2★
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
8%
1★
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Experience in School

My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.

Well structured course

Basically, it’s a private university with a good reputation and also the lecturers are well educated and helpful. The course contains 60% of management-related modules and the remaining technical modules. For anyone who is searching for a techno-management course, I would suggest Hochschule Fresenius.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Learning in a practical way

This university has a lot of qualities such as adapting to students in order to optimize learning, and the desire to confront the student as quickly as possible with the world of work. On the other hand, I would criticize this school for poorly disseminated information and a gloomy community life.

For the love of Schiller

Schiller university is the best thing that can ever happen to anyone l will never regret the day l applied and l mostly love their campus in Germany it has nice aesthetics and obviously l love their culture

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close