SKEMA Business School vs Arizona State University - ASU vs Hochschule Fresenius vs University of California, Santa Barbara - UCSB vs Chapman University
Side-by-side comparison from 354 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical, career-focused programs and in-demand skills acquisition
- +Valuable international experiences and diverse student communities
- +Supportive professors and excellent infrastructure
- +Critical thinking and personal growth
- +Supportive instructors and diverse community
- +Practical experience and career preparation
- +Relevant and varied course content
- +Helpful and educated faculty
- +Supportive university staff
- +Quality education and strong academics
- +Supportive professors and helpful instructors
- +Diverse culture and vibrant student life
Nothing to show
- +Diverse student and educator backgrounds
- +Opportunities for personal and career growth
- +Supportive and organized academic environment
- +Experiential learning and practical application of business concepts
- +High-quality instruction and direct industry leader engagement
- +International exposure and strong peer networking opportunities
- -Poor management and administrative issues.
- -Ineffective communication and guidance.
- -Concerns about teaching quality and faculty understanding of student needs.
- -Insufficient support for online students and inflexible course structures.
- -Poor quality of instruction and unhelpful TAs.
- -Lack of organization and clear communication from administration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
- -Uninspiring teaching methods and irrelevant curriculum.
- -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
- -Students are frustrated by outdated facilities and resources.
- -Students feel there is a lack of support and engaging teaching.
Nothing to show
- -Limited extracurriculars and career opportunities.
- -Poor quality of facilities and overall environment.
- -Lack of academic rigor and student engagement.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor resources detract from learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
The university demonstrates notable strengths in its professors, internationality, and facilities, all receiving scores above 4.2. Student life and value for money also score positively. Accommodation stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower rating. Location also received a respectable score.
This university garners strong evaluations across several key areas. Professors receive the highest marks, indicating a significant strength in teaching quality. The weakest area is student life, though it still maintains a positive rating. Other aspects such as facilities, location, accommodation, internationality, and value are all rated comparably well, suggesting a generally positive student experience.
With a perfect score of 5, location stands out as the university's strongest asset. Student life, however, received the lowest rating at 3.33. Facilities and internationality scored a respectable 3.67, while professors and value were rated highly at 4. Accommodations were rated at 3.
Academically, the university excels, with Professors receiving a notable 4.41 and Value scoring a high 4.29. Facilities and Location also rank well, both above 4.2. However, Accomodation and Internationality present areas for improvement, with scores of 3.82 and 3.88 respectively. Student Life sits in the middle with a respectable 4.18.
Nothing to show
The university exhibits exceptional strengths in its location and internationality, both scoring a near-perfect 4.93. Professors also receive high marks at 4.64, complemented by strong student life (4.15) and value (4.29). The weakest areas are facilities, rated at 3.92, and accommodation, which received a 3.62.
This institution garners exceptionally high marks, particularly excelling in Student Life with a perfect score. Facilities, Location, and Accomodation are also strong, all receiving 4.5 ratings. Professors and Value are rated highly at 4.67. The lowest score, though still solid, is for Internationality at 4.33.
Overwhelmingly positive feedback from 152 reviews highlights practical, career-focused courses, international opportunities, and strong academic/career support. Negative comments (~2.6%) mention poor communication, program disorganization, and concerns about management.
With ~99% positive sentiment, reviews highlight critical thinking, diverse programs, and supportive instructors. A small ~1% of feedback mentions issues with online course structure and TA helpfulness.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%) with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise course content, helpful lecturers, and good accommodation. A few minor criticisms mention strict grading in one course and occasional unhelpful teachers.
University of California reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~88%) with students praising quality education, innovative programs, and helpful instructors. A small percentage of feedback mentions challenges with cost of living, workload, and housing.
Nothing to show
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with 13 out of 14 (93%) giving high ratings. Students praise the diverse educators and peer networks, cultural exposure, and opportunities for personal and academic growth. A small percentage of feedback (around 7%) mentions a lack of extracurricular activities and internship availability for earlier years.
With an average rating of 4.75/5 from four reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight hands-on learning, business idea development, and valuable connections with industry leaders and peers as significant benefits. Minimal negative feedback was present.
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
I like how comprehensive and well-rounded all of the knowledge I have so far learned during my studies has been. However, some instructors refuse to modernize their curricula and continue to teach in their antiquated ways.
Basically, it’s a private university with a good reputation and also the lecturers are well educated and helpful. The course contains 60% of management-related modules and the remaining technical modules. For anyone who is searching for a techno-management course, I would suggest Hochschule Fresenius.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.
Being here has been such a wild ride. Moving to a new country every semester and learning local languages has been both fun and challenging, but it's kinda exhausting too. Still, that hustle gives me an adrenaline rush I low-key love! The best part has been seeing our business ideas come to life and when people genuinely appreciate and engage with something we’ve built, it makes all the hard work worth it.
