KU Leuven vs Vlerick Business School vs UCLL University of Applied Sciences vs ICHEC Brussels Management School vs Artevelde University of Applied Sciences
Side-by-side comparison from 242 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Rigorous and enriching academic programs
- +Strong international community and diverse student body
- +Well-experienced professors and practical course content
- +Rigorous, well-structured programs with real-world application
- +Expert faculty deeply invested in student success
- +Strong industry connections and career focus
- +Engaging and practical learning experiences
- +Supportive lecturers and staff
- +Enriching international environment and opportunities
- +Strong business and management foundation
- +Emphasis on real-world relevance and current company issues
- +Numerous international opportunities and study abroad experiences
- +Practical, real-world application of theory
- +Supportive, approachable lecturers and dynamic classes
- +Opportunities for international exposure and diverse collaboration
Nothing to show
- +Practical, industry-relevant curriculum
- +Supportive and approachable faculty
- +Collaborative and welcoming student community
- -Excessive workloads and limited study spaces.
- -Poor teaching quality and unhelpful staff.
- -Stressful, high-stakes assessment methods.
- -Students dislike the administrative and management issues.
- -They express frustration with outdated facilities and resources.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and lacking practical application.
- -Restrictive international student policies and rising tuition fees are unwelcome.
- -Endless administrative red tape and complicated procedures cause frustration.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a common complaint.
- -Lack of support and clear communication from staff is a major concern.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources detract from the learning experience.
- -High costs and poor value for money are common complaints.
Nothing to show
- -Unsupportive and disrespectful staff and teachers.
- -Poorly maintained and outdated facilities.
- -Lack of clear guidance and communication from the institution.
This institution achieves excellent scores across several aspects, particularly excelling in Internationality (4.42) and Location (4.32). Value for money also received a high mark (4.29). Conversely, the weakest area appears to be Accommodation (3.61), though Facilities (4) and Student Life (3.90) remain solid. Professors' ratings (3.87) are also respectable.
Boasting exceptional scores, the institution excels in its **Facilities** and **Location**, both receiving perfect 5/5 ratings. **Professors**, **Internationality**, and **Value** also demonstrate strong performance with scores above 4.6. Areas for potential improvement include **Student Life** and **Accomodation**, which received the lowest ratings at 3.67 and 3.33 respectively. Overall, the university presents a solid offering, particularly in its physical environment and academic/global engagement.
This institution garners exceptional marks for its facilities, achieving a remarkable 4.64. Student life and value also stand out, both scoring above 4.2. Internationality and accommodation are similarly well-regarded. The university's weakest area, comparatively, is its location, rated at 3.94. Professor quality is also solid, at 4.27.
Internationality stands out as the university's strongest area, receiving the highest rating. Professors and Value are also notable strengths. Conversely, the university's facilities and location received the lowest scores, suggesting these are areas for potential improvement. Student life, accommodation, and professors also contributed positively to the overall assessment.
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths in its **Location**, which received the highest rating. **Professors**, **Student Life**, and **Internationality** also scored highly, indicating positive experiences in these areas. Conversely, **Facilities** and **Accomodation** represent the weakest aspects, with notably lower scores. The **Value** received a solid, above-average rating, contributing to an overall positive university profile.
Nothing to show
This university excels particularly in Internationality and Value, achieving ratings of 4.44 and 4.56 respectively. Location also scores highly at 4.22. Conversely, Accomodation is its weakest area, receiving a score of 3.63, followed closely by Student Life at 3.71. Other aspects like Facilities and Professors fall within a moderate range.
Most reviews (~74%) praise the rigorous, intellectually enriching academic experience and strong international atmosphere. Limited negative feedback (~5.1%) highlights workload intensity and administrative complexity.
All 3 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students praise the well-structured, interactive curriculum, expert faculty, and strong industry connections. Some wish for more career focus for MBA students.
With a 4.42 average rating from 33 reviews, ~94% of feedback is positive, highlighting enriching international experiences, practical skills, and supportive lecturers. A single negative review (~3%) cited restrictive Belgian policies and rising tuition.
With an average rating of 4.05/5 from 41 reviews, ~93% are positive. Students praise the demanding yet foundational business programs and opportunities for international experiences. No negative feedback was reported.
With 49 positive reviews out of 55, ~89% of students highlight practical learning, valuable skills, and approachable lecturers. Communication challenges with local language immersion and event organization were minor concerns for some.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.42/5, approximately 92% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical, industry-relevant courses and supportive, approachable faculty. A small percentage (~8%) of negative feedback mentions issues with teacher and staff attitudes.
KU Leuven provides a rigorous academic experience with a strong international atmosphere. The programs are demanding but intellectually enriching, encouraging independent study. While administrative processes can be complex, the overall environment supports growth for motivated and self-driven students.
Nothing to show
As someone who is about to graduate I look back on my time at UCLL and feel very grateful! The studies challenge us in different ways, the professors are known for their impressive careers before they started lecturing and the international experience is eye-opening. I would recommend the international business management and marketing course if you're open to meet new people and grow in more ways that just learning about business.
Nothing to show
I like how you can directly talk to teachers without feeling like there's this hierarchy. I dislike how unorganised things can be such as: poor communication, poor planning: last minute timing etc.... Having a decent study track coach really helps with everything, because this is the individual that knows a lot about your study progress and who you are normally the most in contact with. Which in my case helped me a lot with all types of processes. Such as: admin work, advice on academic goals, future goals related to academia etc... The negative point for Artevelde would also be that they do not provide any parking for students. Therefore, students have to pay a hefty amount to park their car on the street(s) near campus. Meanwhile other universities/hogeschool in Ghent do provide plenty of this. I'd call it absolute greed because they are more than able to provide, instead they like to hoard the parking spaces. For the language courses, there should be more options than the ones they offer, because the major I'm in (international organisation and management) is full of international students and not everyone wants to study: French, Dutch, Spanish or German.... there should be more options... The other issue in my opinion would be that Artevelde is a "Applied Sciences school" which means, if you want to obtain a master degree afterwards, you can't just directly study one, when you're in Belgium or most of the neighbouring countries, you'd have to do a bridging year (a prep year).
Nothing to show
Following the Advanced bachelor of bioinformatics in Howest Hogeschool, I have to say that is a really well structured program that targets to bridge the gap between theory and working environment and give you the necessary supplies to build up your future ! Professors are are really approachable and willing to help you.
