University of New York in Prague - UNYP vs Simon Business School vs University of Rochester vs Rochester Institute of Technology - RIT vs St. John Fisher College
Side-by-side comparison from 161 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Personal, individual, and supportive student approach
- +Engaging, practical, and critical thinking-focused classes
- +Knowledgeable professors with real-world expertise
Nothing to show
- +Strong academic programs with knowledgeable professors
- +Diverse and friendly student community and social opportunities
- +Ample student resources and support systems
- +Supportive faculty and engaging academic environment
- +Modern facilities and vibrant campus life
- +Welcoming atmosphere and diverse community
- +Strong sense of community and personal professor attention
- +High-quality educational programs
- +Vibrant campus atmosphere and entertainment
- +Supportive, engaging professors and a strong sense of community.
- +Diverse international environment and opportunities for global connections.
- +Rewarding, fulfilling experience with career launching potential and unique learning opportunities.
- +Strong scientific foundations and practical learning
- +Supportive environment with approachable professors and well-equipped labs
- +Opportunities for personal and professional development through student associations
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of essential resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and unresponsiveness from instructors are major concerns.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative & management issues cause confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is prevalent.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a common complaint.
- -Lack of resources and support negatively impacts the learning experience.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
- -The curriculum lacks relevance and practical application.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning experiences.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from faculty and staff is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning and comfort.
- -Lack of engaging teaching methods and course relevance leads to boredom.
This institution performs exceptionally well in **location**, boasting a near-perfect score. **Student life** and **internationality** also received very high marks. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the lowest-rated category. Other areas like **facilities**, **professors**, and **value** received solid, positive scores, indicating a generally well-regarded university experience.
Nothing to show
This institution garners excellent marks in several key areas, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest suit at 4.56. **Student Life** and **Professors** also receive high praise, both scoring 3.89. **Value** is another strong point, rated at 4.11. In contrast, **Location** emerges as the weakest area, with a significantly lower rating of 2.89. **Facilities** and **Accomodation** are rated moderately well, at 3.78.
Across key metrics, this institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **Professors** and **Internationality**, both receiving scores above 4.35. **Student Life** also garners excellent feedback, close behind. Conversely, the **Location** receives the lowest rating among the surveyed areas. Other aspects like **Facilities**, **Accomodation**, and **Value** fall within a good, solid range, indicating a generally positive but varied student experience.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its facilities, professors, and value, all receiving a high 4.5 rating. Conversely, student life and internationality are areas with lower scores, both rated at 3. Location and accommodation sit in the middle range at 3.5. Overall, the university offers a strong academic and resource foundation, though social and international engagement could be enhanced.
Overall, the university garners strong ratings across most aspects. Location stands out as the highest-rated category. Student life and internationality are also highly regarded, reflecting a vibrant and globally connected campus environment. Accommodations received the lowest rating, indicating a potential area for improvement. Facilities, professors, and value all maintain solid, positive scores, suggesting a well-rounded educational experience.
Overall, this institution demonstrates a strong offering, particularly excelling in **Value**, where it achieved a perfect score. Professors, Location, Student Life, and Accommodation all received commendable ratings of 4. The weakest areas identified were Facilities and Internationality, both scoring a 3.
All 46 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.65/5. Students praise the personal approach, engaging and practical classes, and supportive, knowledgeable professors.
Nothing to show
With a 4.22/5 average rating, ~89% of reviews are positive, praising professors' knowledge, research evidence, diverse student body, and campus resources. A small amount of feedback noted issues with uncommunicative advisors.
With an average rating of 4.18/5 from 39 reviews, approximately 93% of feedback is highly positive. Students frequently praise academic rigor, faculty support, modern facilities, and a vibrant campus life. No negative reviews were recorded.
Based on two reviews, the university is highly regarded, with a 4.5/5 average rating. Students praise its tight-knit community, personalized professor attention, and high-quality education, especially within its pharmacy program. There's a strong emphasis on community service.
All 65 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.51/5. Recurring themes include a strong sense of community, supportive and engaging professors, and a valuable international environment.
Students highly praise the faculty, highlighting valuable professional and personal experiences (~100% positive). Recurring themes include strong scientific foundations, practical work, approachable professors, and supportive community.
I really like UNYP because the teachers are so enthusiastic about the subjects they teach. Generally, most of the lessons were very interesting and engaging, and I truly enjoyed them. The teachers are experts in their respective fields, and it's always fun to talk to them about research and ideas. Additionally, I would really like to point out the opportunities, general contacts and experiences in psychology!
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I can say I am completely different from before and after AAU. At some point I wondered but now without even noticing I can see my knowledge has improved a lot. I say seamless because it is not the traditional type of learning, you learn through hands on projects, in class discussions, real world scenarios, interactive sessions and becomes part of your day to day life and interests. I 100% Recommend AAU to anyone who wants to experience a life-long a real international community and learn in the process while having the time of your life in Europe!
Nothing to show
