SKEMA Business School vs University of the People - UoPeople vs College of William and Mary vs University of California, Santa Barbara - UCSB vs Schiller International University
Side-by-side comparison from 3,415 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Industry-focused learning with practical skills and career opportunities
- +International environment and diverse student body
- +Quality of teaching and faculty expertise
- +Affordable, tuition-free online learning
- +Flexibility for work-life balance
- +Diverse international student community
- +Excellent academics and challenging coursework
- +Strong sense of community and studious peers
- +Abundant extracurricular activities and personal growth opportunities
- +Quality education and strong academics
- +Supportive professors and helpful instructors
- +Diverse culture and vibrant student life
- +Diverse student and educator backgrounds
- +Opportunities for personal and career growth
- +Supportive and organized academic environment
Nothing to show
- +Experiential learning and business creation
- +Industry leader insights and networking opportunities
- +Diverse international environment and impactful outcomes
- -Administrative and management issues with communication, exam, and results handling.
- -Perceived focus on financial gain over student welfare and education.
- -Unhelpful or discriminatory faculty and poor academic program organization.
- -Data security breaches and lack of student community resources.
- -Hidden costs through mandatory exam fees outweighing perceived affordability.
- -Difficulty navigating the online learning platform.
- -Poor quality instruction and teaching from professors/adjuncts.
- -Outdated and low-quality course materials and content.
- -High cost compared to the perceived value and quality of education.
- -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
- -Students are frustrated by outdated facilities and resources.
- -Students feel there is a lack of support and engaging teaching.
- -Limited extracurriculars and career opportunities.
- -Poor quality of facilities and overall environment.
- -Lack of academic rigor and student engagement.
Nothing to show
- -Disorganized and unresponsive administration.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Unengaging and ineffective teaching methods.
This institution garners strong evaluations, particularly in its **Professors** and **Internationality**, both scoring above 4.3. **Facilities**, **Location**, and **Student Life** also receive commendable marks, all exceeding 4.1. **Value** sits just above 4.0. The area with the lowest score is **Accomodation**, averaging 3.59.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strength in its internationality, boasting a near-perfect rating. Professors and value for money also received outstanding scores. Areas for improvement are evident in accommodation, which is the lowest-rated aspect. Facilities and student life are mid-range, while location also falls into a similar tier of performance.
Student life stands out as the university's strongest area with a perfect 4.0 rating. Facilities and location also received solid marks, both at 3.67. However, internationality emerged as the weakest point, scoring a comparatively low 2.75. Accommodations and value were rated moderately well, while professors also received average to good feedback.
Academically, the university excels, with Professors receiving a notable 4.41 and Value scoring a high 4.29. Facilities and Location also rank well, both above 4.2. However, Accomodation and Internationality present areas for improvement, with scores of 3.82 and 3.88 respectively. Student Life sits in the middle with a respectable 4.18.
The university exhibits exceptional strengths in its location and internationality, both scoring a near-perfect 4.93. Professors also receive high marks at 4.64, complemented by strong student life (4.15) and value (4.29). The weakest areas are facilities, rated at 3.92, and accommodation, which received a 3.62.
Nothing to show
This institution garners strong overall evaluations, with location standing out as the highest-rated aspect at 4.67. Accommodations and internationality also received excellent scores of 4.5. Areas demonstrating solid performance include facilities and student life, both at 4.33, alongside value and professors, which are rated at 4.25.
Approximately 97.5% of reviews are positive, praising opportunities, industry links, and diverse student life. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions poor management and communication.
Over 3100 reviews give a 4.87 average rating, praising flexibility, affordability, and diverse community. Less than 1% of feedback mentions navigation difficulties or data breach concerns.
With an average rating of 3.75, approximately 75% of reviews are positive, praising beautiful campuses, challenging academics, and extracurricular opportunities. About 25% of feedback is negative, citing administrative issues and concerns about teaching quality.
University of California reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~88%) with students praising quality education, innovative programs, and helpful instructors. A small percentage of feedback mentions challenges with cost of living, workload, and housing.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with 13 out of 14 (93%) giving high ratings. Students praise the diverse educators and peer networks, cultural exposure, and opportunities for personal and academic growth. A small percentage of feedback (around 7%) mentions a lack of extracurricular activities and internship availability for earlier years.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.4/5 from 5 reviews, students are highly satisfied. Recurring positive themes include practical, hands-on learning experiences and valuable networking opportunities. A minimal amount of feedback noted occasional scheduling issues with tutoring.
Studying at Skema Business School in Sophia Antipolis was a fantastic experience. The campus is modern and located in a wonderful tech hub. The professors bring real-world business experience to the classroom. I loved the multicultural environment and the group projects. Skema gave me great friends, a strong global network, and the right skills for my career.
I study Computer Science at University of the People. In my opinion, I am very happy with this school. One good point is flexibility. I can study and work full-time at the same time. A normal university is impossible for my life because I must work every day, and I love sleeping on weekends. Also, my classmates are from many countries. The discussion board is very crazy and fun. Different cultures always surprise me. Sometimes my group members reply to my messages at 4 AM. But studying online at UoPeople is not an easy game. Every week, deadlines attack me. Assignments, quizzes, and exams are very heavy. So time management is very important. I drink three coffees every night to survive. Maybe this survival skill is the best thing I get from this school. One bad point is that some textbooks are a little old. But the price is good, and I can study in my bed with my cat supervising me. I learn many things, so I think this university is the best choice for my life right now.
It is very rare that I feel regret about the past, but joining W&M's online program in school counseling was one of the worst decisions I have ever made. There are far more affordable options, but I thought that the university's reputation warrants paying more. Huge mistake. Very few professors are trying to teach. Most classes are "taught" by adjuncts (and I use the word teach very liberally here). Teaching really only involves watching a few poor quality videos (some of which are from YouTube), read a textbook, and write a paper, on which you receive nearly zero feedback. I haven't done a poll but a huge number of students are unhappy and would transfer if not for the money already spent. After nearly 2 years in the program, I am certain that only a couple of faculty member would even recognize my name - asking anyone for a recommendation letter, for example, would be impossible. The faculty really tries to spend as little time as possible on this program, seeing it as a quick and easy pay check. I will qualify that there have been a couple of professors who were outstanding, but they are truly an exception. Course reviews are never addressed and nothing changes. Suddenly, mid-program, the school of education raised tuition by 25% (!) citing inflation. They can and will do this arbitrarily. While this may sound like a rant it is not. I am simply hoping to prevent others from making the mistake that I have made. I was choosing between several programs and made the worst choice imaginable.
Nothing to show
I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.
Nothing to show
Being here has been such a wild ride. Moving to a new country every semester and learning local languages has been both fun and challenging, but it's kinda exhausting too. Still, that hustle gives me an adrenaline rush I low-key love! The best part has been seeing our business ideas come to life and when people genuinely appreciate and engage with something we’ve built, it makes all the hard work worth it.
