Pavol Jozef Šafárik University - UPJS vs Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro - UFRJ vs Cranfield University vs ISEG – Lisbon School of Economics and Management vs Petroleum Training Institute - PTI
Side-by-side comparison from 61 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Rigorous and demanding academic programs
- +Professors’ high standards and supportive guidance
- +Preparation for future career success
- +Extensive opportunities for research and extracurricular projects.
- +High-quality, knowledgeable professors and mentors.
- +Strong industry connections and company partnerships.
- +Strong postgraduate focus and mature atmosphere
- +World-class facilities and industry partnerships
- +Excellent career services and renowned faculty
- +Supportive and experienced professors.
- +Positive learning environment and relevant curriculum.
- +Great student community and social experiences.
- +High-quality, industry-relevant training
- +International exposure and practical learning
- +Strong reputation and employment prospects
- +Engaging teachers and diverse study programs
- +Welcoming environment with international students and helpful staff
- +Excellent facilities and valuable global opportunities
- +Balanced academic rigor and quality of life
- +Supportive academic environment and faculty
- +Tranquil environment conducive to study
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are frequently criticized.
- -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or not adequately preparing students for the real world.
- -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a common complaint.
- -Concerns exist about the quality of teaching and curriculum.
- -Administrative and management issues create frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a common complaint.
- -A lack of clear communication and support is frustrating.
- -Students are frustrated by the lack of refunds for registration fees, especially for international students facing visa or financial issues.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning and experience.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a major concern.
- -Frustrating administrative and management issues create significant roadblocks.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and a disconnect between staff and students cause dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative & management issues frustrate students.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a common complaint.
- -Lack of resources and support negatively impacts learning.
This institution demonstrates a solid overall performance. Areas excelling include Professors (4.5) and Accommodation (4), alongside strong showings in Facilities and Internationality (both 4). Conversely, Location received the lowest rating at 3, with Student Life not far behind at 3.5, indicating these aspects may offer the most room for improvement.
Overall, this university demonstrates a strong performance, particularly excelling in **Value** and **Professors**, both receiving very high marks. **Internationality** is also a significant strength. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerges as the weakest area, scoring the lowest. **Facilities** and **Location** received moderate ratings, while **Student Life** is also a positive aspect.
This institution excels in its Facilities and Professors, both scoring a strong 4.33. Student Life, Internationality, and Value are also well-regarded, each receiving a 3.83. Accommodation is rated a solid 4. The university's weakest area, however, is Location, with a score of 2.67.
This university garners praise for its **strong offerings in location and value**, both receiving a score of 4.17. Professors and internationality also score highly at 4.13. Conversely, **accommodation stands out as the weakest area**, with a significantly lower rating of 3.30. Facilities and student life maintain solid scores around 4.09.
The university excels in two key areas, earning a perfect score for Value and an outstanding 4.67 for both Facilities and Accommodation. Student life and location also score well, with both receiving 4.33. Professors and Internationality are rated a solid 4. The university's weakest areas are its teaching staff and its global appeal.
This institution receives exceptionally high ratings, achieving a perfect score in five key areas: Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, and Accommodation. Areas of slightly lower, yet still very strong, performance include Internationality and Value, both scoring 4.5 out of 5. Overall, the university demonstrates a remarkably consistent and excellent performance across all evaluated aspects.
This institution garners exceptionally high marks, particularly excelling in Location and Accommodation, both receiving perfect scores. Facilities and Student Life also stand out with excellent ratings. Professors and Internationality are rated very well, though slightly lower than the top-scoring areas. Value is also strong, indicating a positive overall perception of the university experience.
With an average rating of 4/5, the ~100% of positive feedback highlights a strict but ultimately beneficial university experience. Students feel professors' demanding nature prepared them well for their careers.
All 16 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.44/5. Students highlight enriching experiences, valuable classes, and numerous opportunities for research and projects. Some mention infrastructure issues and teaching methods as minor drawbacks.
With an average rating of 4.33/5, ~92% of reviews are positive. Students praise world-class research facilities, industry partnerships, and excellent career services. No negative feedback was reported.
Around 82% of 23 reviews are positive, praising the environment, caring teachers, interesting subjects, and good infrastructure. One review, ~4.4%, mentioned issues with refund policies for international students.
All three reviews are positive, giving a perfect 5/5 average. Students highlight the institution's strong focus on dedication and perfectionism, international training, and practical, industry-standard approaches to engineering and science education, particularly in Oil and Gas.
University feedback is overwhelmingly positive, with a 5/5 average rating. Students praise the variety of study programs, friendly staff, and excellent facilities like classrooms and the library. Lunch options are also highlighted as very good.
All three reviews are positive, averaging 4.33/5 stars. Students highlight a balanced academic and quality of life, a supportive environment, and academic excellence, particularly noting the university's tranquil setting.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
For the campus is going 10/10, a lovely place, comfortable ambience and cozy life you can have. Especially people who want switch from capital city to tranquil area. The natural campus provides soothe accommodations, facilities and communities. For the course is going to 7/10, sufficient practical and hands-on programme while your main modules. However, some styles of professor you might take more time to familiar with it. Most of modules blend academic logical and company's project. Moreover, the UK's MSc has just one year, so it makes you feel intensive and stressful. Especially some assignments are not easy to accomplishment in a limited time. For the communities, includes club, social life and corporate competition, could be 8/10. In Cranfield, as an unique campus which only provides MSc
What brought me to this university was firstly its national ranking and word of mouth of family members. I have attended it for 2 years now and it has been a great experience. The professors are helpful and the curriculum is very interesting although I find our mathematics level too advanced for business degree. The infrastructure is great and in an excellent location. There are many clubs to join and opportunities for the students to take advantage of. In site parking only available to masters students and higher and street parking is extremely rare and quite expensive close to the university.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
