University of New York in Prague - UNYP vs University of Chemistry and Technology of Prague vs Prague University of Economics and Business - VSE vs Charles University vs Czech Technical University in Prague - CVUT
Side-by-side comparison from 216 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +International, American-style education with small, discussion-based classes
- +Practical, real-world learning from experienced, accessible professors
- +Supportive and engaging environment that encourages critical thinking
- +Supportive faculty and program flexibility
- +Practical, hands-on learning with excellent labs and equipment
- +Strong community and international student experience
- +Strong academic reputation and future employability focus
- +Opportunities for networking and practical skill development
- +Supportive learning environment with structured assessments
- +Passionate and expert professors
- +Numerous academic and extracurricular opportunities
- +Diverse and international environment
- +Expert faculty & modern, practical curriculum
- +Strong career support & global recognition
- +Well-regarded technical programs
- +Caring professors and strong community support
- +Enriching international environment and connections
- +Inspiring location and career development opportunities
Nothing to show
- -Overpriced tuition and fees.
- -Poor quality of teaching and curriculum.
- -Unresponsive administration and management.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are commonly criticized.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and poorly delivered.
- -Rote memorization over critical thinking is emphasized.
- -Poor student treatment and high failure rates.
- -Discriminatory practices towards international students.
- -Lack of fair assessment opportunities.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of effective communication and transparency is a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment.
- -Poor communication and administrative issues.
- -Lack of effective teaching and learning resources.
Nothing to show
The university garners strong scores across most aspects, with **Location** standing out as exceptionally high at 4.90. **Student Life** and **Internationality** also received very positive feedback. **Accomodation** represents the weakest area, scoring 3.95, while **Facilities** and **Value** are rated well but not as high as other categories. Professors and overall value are also rated favorably.
The university's location received the highest marks, with a score of 4.7, followed closely by facilities and accommodation, both at 4.27. Areas for improvement include internationality, which scored 3.82, making it the weakest surveyed category. Student life and value for money were rated at a solid 4.
Outstanding ratings mark this institution, particularly excelling in Internationality and Value, both receiving a perfect score of 5. Facilities, Professors, Location, and Accommodation also garnered exceptionally high marks at 4.5. Student Life, while still strong at 4, represents the sole area below the top tier.
Overall, the university demonstrates robust performance in several key areas. Professors and location receive particularly high marks, alongside strong scores for student life and internationality. Value is also rated favorably. The weakest areas, though still respectable, are facilities and accommodation.
This institution garners high marks for its **Facilities**, scoring a notable 4.46. Professors, student life, and overall value are also well-regarded, all receiving a consistent 4.31. Internationality sits at a solid 4.0. The weakest area identified is **Accomodation**, which received a rating of 3.85, indicating room for improvement in this aspect.
The university garners positive feedback across several key aspects. Location stands out as the strongest area with a rating of 4.62. Student life and internationality also score highly, both exceeding 4.5. Conversely, accommodation receives the lowest score at 4.20, representing the weakest area. Facilities, professors, and value maintain solid ratings, all above 4.4.
Nothing to show
All 50 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.68/5. Students praise the international environment, smaller classes, and professors' practical industry experience. Discussions and critical thinking are highlighted strengths.
Nine out of ten reviews are positive, highlighting enriching experiences, skilled faculty, and practical, research-oriented programs. Some mention demanding courses and occasional English communication barriers from instructors.
~67% of reviews are positive, highlighting excellent academic programs, career focus, and engaging learning opportunities. A small percentage of feedback (~17%) criticizes the memorization-heavy approach and lack of critical thinking encouragement. The average rating is 3.67/5.
Over 97% of reviews are positive, praising excellent professors and numerous academic/extracurricular opportunities. A small fraction of feedback (~3%) mentions poor student treatment and unfair academic progression.
With an average rating of 4.31/5 from 16 reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students praise good teachers, useful projects, and career help, noting high-quality, modern education and opportunities for internships and jobs.
All 66 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students highlight a strong sense of community, supportive and knowledgeable professors, and valuable international experiences. The university's location and resources are also frequently praised.
Nothing to show
I studied at UNYP and overall had a very positive experience. What I appreciated most was the international environment, smaller classes, and the chance to interact directly with professors instead of feeling like just another student in a huge lecture hall. The university has a practical, English-speaking atmosphere, and it is a good fit for students who want an American-style education in the center of Prague. I also liked that many classes encouraged discussion, presentations, and real examples rather than only theory. Of course, like at any university, some administrative processes can take time and the experience may depend on the program and professors you choose. But from a student perspective, UNYP gave me useful academic experience, international connections, and a lot of personal growth. I would recommend it to students who want a smaller, international university environment in Prague and are ready to be active in their studies.
Nothing to show
At this university, you need to memorize tons of information - most of it you will never ever use + you will forget it right after the exam. Students are not encouraged to use their brains and to come up with their own solutions, but to just absorb the information the teacher gives them. I got As and Bs but haven't learn almost anything.
My name is Bashar Ali, I am a medicine student in the first year. Today I am going to share my experience in Charles university. As a new student I was confused at the beginning of the year but after not long time I got used to the university system and the university stuff was very helpful starting from professional and nice teachers and ending with office employees. For me the academic side was perfect and my experience was very good. The university provide us with valuable information and we can find a lot of different students from different parts of the world so we can meet people from different cultures. I lived in the dorms and for me it was good because it was safe, clean and cheap. Now I am very happy in my studies especially that the university degree is recognized all over the world in addition that it is one of the highest ranking in the world in conclusion, Charles University offers a world-class medical education that combines rigorous academics, exceptional clinical training, and abundant research opportunities
Firstly, I would like to mention that CVUT is one of the best unis in Czech Republic. After graduating it gives a plenty of opportunities to work since its certificate is recognised around the world in huge companies. It’s not a secret that not all of the students can work while studying, it’s quite difficult to study there but it worth it. Inside, every faculty’s building is modern. Especially FIT, where I am studying now looks great. Professors and tutors create opportunity to study, they can answer to all your questions if there are. Secondly, getting to the uni is not that difficult even if you live far from it. Transportation in public is so developed and trams can get you anywhere quickly. For instance, I am living in Prague 3 and uni is located in Prague 6, even though in map it the distance could be seen so far, by using tram I get to the uni in 20-30 minutes. To sum up, it can be difficult to study there and subject can be hard too but it worth it since after it creates you a huge opportunity to work in successful companies without any doubt.
I can say I am completely different from before and after AAU. At some point I wondered but now without even noticing I can see my knowledge has improved a lot. I say seamless because it is not the traditional type of learning, you learn through hands on projects, in class discussions, real world scenarios, interactive sessions and becomes part of your day to day life and interests. I 100% Recommend AAU to anyone who wants to experience a life-long a real international community and learn in the process while having the time of your life in Europe!
Nothing to show
