EADA Business School vs GBSB Global Business School vs UIC Barcelona vs Universidad CEU Cardenal Herrera - CEU UCH vs Universidad de Jaén
Side-by-side comparison from 274 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Expert faculty and engaging learning environment
- +Practical, real-world business education
- +Welcoming, international community and supportive staff
- +Excellent, knowledgeable, and passionate professors
- +Small class sizes and diverse, international student community
- +Strong focus on business mindsets and entrepreneurial support
- +Excellent academic programs and knowledgeable, kind professors.
- +Supportive and collaborative student atmosphere.
- +Strong preparation for career success and international outlook.
- +Strong practical focus with real-world brand experience
- +Supportive teachers and excellent campus facilities/resources
- +Diverse, multicultural student body and environment
- +Holistic curriculum and interdisciplinary approach
- +Helpful and supportive professors
- +Vibrant student community and international opportunities
Nothing to show
- +Integrated marketing, psychology, and neuroscience curriculum
- +Expert instructors and supportive staff
- +Practical application and industry connections
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and inflexible processes.
- -Lack of depth in course content for those with prior knowledge, and insufficient focus on promised aspects like sustainability.
- -Arbitrary grading and an overly rigid classroom structure.
- -Administrative and management issues are poorly handled and lack organization.
- -Low educational level and unfulfilled promises regarding internships are a concern.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of proper resources are disappointing.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Lack of support and indifferent attitude from staff create a negative experience.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistent complaints.
- -The curriculum lacks relevance and practical application for many students.
- -Unclear and ineffective teaching.
- -Disorganized administrative services.
- -Unfair and excessively high failure rates.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources are a recurring problem.
- -Communication is often poor, leading to confusion and unmet expectations.
This university garners excellent scores across various aspects, notably excelling in **Location**, with an impressive 4.93. **Student Life** and **Internationality** also receive very high marks. Accommodation is its lowest-rated area at 4.12, though still respectable. Other categories, including facilities, professors, and value, all fall within a narrow, strong range between 4.43 and 4.49.
The university demonstrates considerable strengths in **Internationality (4.625)** and **Location (4.379)**, alongside high marks for **Professors (4.219)**. Student Life and Value also received positive scores. Conversely, **Accomodation (2.75)** stands out as the lowest-rated aspect, with Facilities also scoring moderately.
The university demonstrates particular strengths in its academic offerings, with **Professors** receiving a high rating of 4.27. **Facilities** are also well-regarded at 4.09. Areas for improvement are evident in **Accomodation**, which scored lowest at 3.33. Other aspects like Location, Student Life, Internationality, and Value are rated moderately.
This university garners exceptionally high marks in internationality, boasting a rating of 4.65. Facilities also received strong acclaim at 4.56, closely followed by professors at 4.53 and value at 4.48. The student experience is well-regarded, with a 4.35 rating for student life. Location and accommodation represent the areas with the lowest scores, both falling in the upper 3-point range.
This university showcases an excellent student life, receiving its highest score in this area. Professors and internationality are also highly rated, alongside strong marks for facilities and value. Areas for potential improvement include accommodation, which scored the lowest among the evaluated aspects. Location also received a solid, though not exceptional, rating.
Nothing to show
Across all evaluated aspects, this institution demonstrates exceptional strength. It achieves a perfect score of 5 in every category, including Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value. This indicates a consistently outstanding experience for students in all surveyed areas, with no single category performing weaker than others.
Nearly all reviews are positive, praising the enriching academic experience, knowledgeable faculty, and practical, international approach. A small number of reviews mention minor issues with program communication or administrative flexibility.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong faculty engagement, personalized learning, and a diverse international community. A small portion (~8.8%) of negative feedback points to administrative issues and perceived low educational standards.
With an average rating of 4.21/5, approximately 86% of reviews are positive, praising the collaborative atmosphere, quality programs, and accessible location. One review (around 7%) cites issues with indifferent administration.
With ~94% positive sentiment, reviews highlight enriching theoretical and practical skills, multicultural environments, and helpful teachers. Some noted the campus is a bit far from the city. No negative feedback was reported.
With a 4.23 average rating from 22 reviews, ~91% are positive, highlighting exceptional core curriculum, interdisciplinary learning, helpful professors, and positive student interactions. A small portion (~4.6%) express concerns regarding unclear teaching, disorganization, and grading.
Nothing to show
All 6 reviews were positive, giving an average of 5/5 stars. Students highlighted the program's blend of marketing, psychology, and neuroscience, and found classes engaging and practical. Professors were professional and supportive.
International Immersion: Transformative Leadership for Future Challenges – Program Review I had the opportunity to participate in the International Immersion program at EADA Business School, Barcelona, spending a month at the Barcelona campus and an additional week at the Collbató campus. The overall experience was highly enriching and impactful. The classroom sessions at the Barcelona campus were exceptionally interactive and engaging. The learning environment encouraged open dialogue, collaborative thinking, and the exchange of diverse perspectives among participants from different backgrounds. This significantly enhanced the depth of discussions and contributed to a well-rounded learning experience. The Collbató campus offered a distinctly immersive environment, combining experiential learning with outdoor activities. This setting complemented the academic sessions by fostering teamwork, reflection, and leadership development in a more informal yet highly effective context. Overall, the program was a valuable learning journey. While the immediate experience was positive, its true impact has become more evident over time. It has contributed meaningfully to my personal and professional development, particularly in enhancing my leadership perspective, cross-cultural understanding, and ability to navigate complex, real-world challenges.
The overall experience was ok. Yet I dont feel that it was worth 10k€ a year for what I received. Starting from repetitive classes in each year but with a different name until not having bathrooms for almost 6 months. The quality of the majority of classes was 2/5. The content of the classes was not deep enough to teach you about tools, appliances, ways of solving, what should be taken into consideration. On my 2 last years. I took the exact same class of public relations but named differently. Not even the professor knew what to say any more. I didn’t saw not event one tool that is used in public relations. We analyzed just one case of public relations in the whole semester. And it was a mention not event a full analysis. I do not recommend GBSB. The internships they say the help you with on their webpage its a lie. They do not help you in any way to connect you with no company. They are not event informed in how to help you with the visa.
Classes are good, I would try to make them more interactive and with more practices in class. Professors normally are good, in the english course I believe the english of the teachers could be better specially if the course is taught in that language. I also believe professors could interact more with their students and try to get in contact with students they see may be struggling. Otherwise the campus, although a bit small is fine, really nice, the library could be a little bigger.
Studying Advertising and public relations at CEU Cardenal Herrera was an enriching and transformative experience. One thing I standout is the combined theoretical and practical skills we learned throughout the career. We work hand on hand with well known brands that give us a profesional view and a bigger understanding of the profesional world. The multicultural environment at CEU help me develop cultural sensibility and open my perspective because of the diverse backgrounds. The most enriching experience was living in the amazing city en Valencia, its stunning architecture and its amazing food. I graduated feeling confident and prepared to enter to the professional world.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
The classes are so intresting I love how they they teach you about psychology and business strategy, I really like how the teachers are real professionals in terms of marketing , buisness... overall I really enjoy it.
