Université du Québec à Montréal - UQAM vs Concordia University vs HEC Montreal vs School of Digital Arts, Animation and Design - NAD-UQAC vs École de technologie supérieure - ETS
Side-by-side comparison from 185 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Helpful professors and supportive staff
- +Strong marketing & business programs with useful real-world application
- +Vibrant student life and integration support
- +Engaging professors and relevant, practical learning
- +Supportive and inclusive campus environment
- +Strong focus on entrepreneurial and career preparation
- +Diverse and well-rounded program offerings
- +Strong career preparation and job market focus
- +Engaging professors and ample student opportunities
- +Industry-relevant opportunities and professional preparation
- +Supportive and attentive faculty guidance
- +Lack of English support for international students
- +Limited scholarship opportunities for non-French speakers
- +Difficulty finding part-time employment
Nothing to show
- +Industry-active instructors and professional preparation
- +Supportive and welcoming atmosphere
- +Emphasis on practical, project-based learning
- -Lack of support and slow communication.
- -Poor quality of teaching and communication from instructors.
- -Ineffective and error-filled exam design.
- -Lack of adequate student support and accommodations.
- -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a common complaint.
- -There is significant dissatisfaction with the curriculum and teaching quality.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a significant concern.
- -Poor communication and a lack of administrative support create frustration.
- -Overcrowded classrooms and insufficient individual attention hinder learning.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant problem.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of necessary resources are a common complaint.
- -The quality and relevance of the curriculum are often criticized.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Facilities are frequently described as outdated and in poor condition.
- -Teaching quality and curriculum relevance are inconsistent and often disappointing.
This university receives its highest marks in Location, with a strong showing also in Student Life and Value. Professors are rated well, as is Accomodation. Internationality and Facilities, while still solid, represent the areas with slightly lower scores in this assessment.
This institution garners particularly high marks in **Location** (4.52) and **Internationality** (4.53). Student life and value are also well-regarded, both exceeding 4.2. Facilities and professors receive solid ratings around 4.1. The **Accommodation** category, however, shows the lowest score at 3.95, indicating this area could be a focus for improvement.
This university exhibits a strong performance across most surveyed areas. Student life stands out as its highest-rated aspect, closely followed by value and facilities. Accommodation and location, while still positive, represent the university's comparatively weaker areas, though all ratings remain robust. Internationality and professors also received favorable scores.
Overall, the university scores well in several key areas. Its strongest aspects are professors, student life, and accommodation, all receiving top marks. Facilities and internationality are identified as areas with moderate ratings. The university also performs well in terms of location and value.
A notable strength of this institution is its prime **Location**, scoring a high 4.5. Conversely, **Student Life** presents a significant area for improvement, with a low rating of 1.5. The university also received solid ratings in **Professors** and **Value** (both 3.5), with **Facilities** and **Accomodation** averaging 3. **Internationality** sits in the middle at 2.5.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its **Value** (4.67) and **Facilities** (4.47), indicating high satisfaction in these key areas. **Accomodation** (4.33) and **Student Life** (4.20) also received positive scores. However, the university's **Location** (3.13) stands out as a comparatively weaker aspect, with **Internationality** (3.87) also receiving a moderate rating.
Around 92% of reviews are positive, highlighting helpful professors, useful and interesting programs, and a supportive student environment. One negative review cited a lack of support.
Approximately 97% of 137 reviews are positive, praising inclusivity, great professors, and practical learning. A small amount of negative feedback (around 3%) mentions issues with teacher quality and exam design.
With an average rating of 4.44/5 from 18 reviews, ~83% highlight diverse management and social programs, intimate class sizes with professor interaction, and numerous student events and scholarships. Some mention career focus and unique degree paths.
With a 5/5 average rating, this university is highly regarded by students, who praise its industry opportunities and career preparation. ~100% of feedback is positive, highlighting supportive teachers.
With an average rating of 4/5 from two reviews, positive feedback comprises approximately 50% of the sentiment. Students highlight French language requirements and inflation as challenges, while one positive review commends the university for not requiring French for graduate students.
Nothing to show
With a 4.4/5 average rating from 15 reviews, ~93% are positive. Students praise quality teaching from industry professionals and a supportive, welcoming atmosphere. The heavy workload and project-focused curriculum prepare them well for professional careers.
After considering UQAM for my studies, I ultimately decided against it due to the lack of support I experienced. While the university's programs seemed promising, the insufficient support infrastructure made me hesitant to commit. The limited communication channels and slow response times left me feeling uncertain about my ability to navigate challenges effectively. Ultimately, I chose to pursue my education elsewhere, where I felt confident in the support system provided.
Concordia University's linguistics program is a well-rounded introduction to the field of study for any aspiring linguist. The required courses allow students to browse all areas of the field, ranging from syntax to historical linguistics. Once you find your niche within the program, you can pick and choose what to learn from the more advanced courses. My favorite course during my time in the program was a special topics class on Old Egyptian. Mark Hale, the incredible professor who taught the course, inspired my passion for classical languages. My only critique of the program is the lack of advertised resources pertaining to post-graduate endeavors in the field. More information shared on graduate studies might have been helpful early on in the program. In conclusion, Concordia University is a great institution as long as you're passionate about your studies and well-engaged in your program.
HEC Montréal's Supply Chain Logistics program is highly regarded for its excellent faculty, who bring a wealth of knowledge and professional experience to the classroom. The program is well-connected with industry leaders, offering students valuable networking opportunities. It emphasizes practical learning over theory, ensuring that students gain hands-on experience and real-world skills. Overall, it's a professional and comprehensive program that prepares students effectively for careers in supply chain management.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
