Rennes School of Business vs GEM Alpine Business School vs SKEMA Business School vs ISG International Business School vs Deusto Business School

Side-by-side comparison from 242 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Deusto Business School (5.00)
Rennes School of Business: wins 2/7 categories
GEM Alpine Business School: wins 1/7 categories
SKEMA Business School: wins 1/7 categories
ISG International Business School: wins 0/7 categories
Deusto Business School: wins 0/7 categories
INSEEC Business School: wins 0/7 categories
Schiller International University: wins 3/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Management
Best programme: Programme Grande Ecole (PGE)
Best programme: Supply Chain Management
Best programme: Accounting and Finance
Best programme: Master's Degree in Finance
Best programme: Digital Marketing
Tampa, Florida, United States
4.50
Read more reviews
12 reviews
×
Best programme: BA International Relations and Diplomacy
Category ratings
Facilities
4.10
4.10
4.21
Win
4.00
Not rated
3.43
3.83
Location
4.29
3.92
4.25
4.50
Not rated
4.64
4.92
Win
Professors
4.28
4.19
4.42
4.50
Not rated
3.86
4.58
Win
Internationality
4.34
4.06
4.36
4.75
Not rated
4.50
4.92
Win
Student life
4.41
Win
4.20
4.11
4.25
Not rated
4.07
4.08
Value
4.17
Win
4.15
4.03
4.00
Not rated
3.64
4.17
Accommodation
3.82
3.83
Win
3.57
3.25
1.00
2.50
3.67
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent faculty and stimulating academic environment
  • +Strong international student community and welcoming atmosphere
  • +Conducive learning environment with good facilities and practical focus
  • +Diverse faculty and global insights
  • +Innovative and relevant curriculum with real-world application
  • +Strong networking and international opportunities
  • +strong international exposure & opportunities
  • +practical and relevant program curriculum & skills
  • +valuable alumni network & career support
  • +International & multicultural environment, supportive atmosphere
  • +Dynamic professors, engaging and flexible programs
  • +Excellent alumni network, international opportunities
  • +High academic standards and professional faculty
  • +Focus on holistic development, including values and social impact
  • +Rigorous and structured learning environment
  • +Practical, group-focused learning and professional initiation.
  • +High-quality teaching and supportive faculty mentorship.
  • +Strong professional network and vibrant student life.
  • +Strong academic programs and supportive instructors
  • +Opportunities for international exposure and cultural immersion
  • +Practical experience and career advancement support
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues, especially for international students.
  • -Poor English communication and fluency from both administration and some professors.
  • -Lack of inclusivity and accessibility for non-French speakers.
  • -Outdated and insufficient facilities are a consistent problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues lead to disorganization and frustration.
  • -Poor communication from the institution causes confusion and unmet expectations.
  • -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and disorganization.
  • -Perceived focus on profit over student welfare, with concerns about teaching quality and discrimination.
  • -Ineffective career guidance and support for students.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance create an unpleasant learning environment.
  • -Lack of resources and support hampers academic success.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of engagement and transparency from instructors is a common complaint.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
  • -Lack of student support and responsiveness from administration.
  • -Uninspiring curriculum and teaching methods.
  • -Limited extracurriculars and career opportunities for early students.
  • -Poor campus environment and lack of engagement.
Rating summary
What students say

An assessment of the university reveals strong student life and internationality, with ratings of 4.41 and 4.34 respectively. Professors and location also received favorable scores. The weakest area identified is accommodation, which scored 3.82. Overall, facilities and value were rated well, indicating a generally positive experience for students in these aspects.

Across key metrics, this institution demonstrates a well-rounded performance. Student life stands out as a particularly strong area, closely followed by professors and overall value. Conversely, accommodation received the lowest rating, indicating room for improvement in this aspect of the student experience. The university also scores well in facilities, internationality, and location.

A comprehensive assessment reveals a university with distinct strengths and areas for improvement. Professors and internationality stand out as particularly strong aspects, receiving high marks. Student life and facilities are also rated positively. However, accommodation emerges as the weakest area, with a noticeably lower score compared to other metrics. Value for money is also a solid, though not exceptional, performer in this rating overview.

This university demonstrates excellent strengths in **Internationality**, with a score of 4.75, and **Professors**, rated at 4.5. **Location** also receives a high mark of 4.5. While **Facilities**, **Student Life**, and **Value** are all well-regarded, the **Accomodation** is its weakest point, receiving a score of 3.25.

The university's strongest aspect is its accommodation, receiving a perfect score. However, significant weaknesses are apparent across most other surveyed areas, with facilities, professors, location, student life, internationality, and value all scoring zero. This indicates considerable room for improvement in nearly all facets of the university experience outside of its housing provisions.

This university demonstrates notable strengths in its **Location**, receiving a high rating of 4.64. **Student Life** and **Internationality** are also well-regarded. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower score of 2.5. Other aspects like **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Value** fall within a moderate to good range.

Considerable acclaim has been received across multiple university aspects. The institution excels particularly in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring an impressive 4.92. **Professors** also garnered high marks at 4.58. Conversely, the **Accomodation** received the lowest rating at 3.67, with **Facilities** also being a relative weakness at 3.83. **Student Life** and **Value** scored moderately well.

Reviews summary
Highlights

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~97% of feedback praising excellent faculty, practical learning, and a supportive international community. A small amount of negative feedback (~3%) highlights administrative and communication issues, particularly for international students.

With a 4.34/5 average rating from 50 reviews, ~90% are positive. Students praise the supportive environment, valuable faculty insights, and innovative, tech-aligned courses. Some highlight group work stress and limited exchange program admission.

Around 97% of reviews are positive, praising international opportunities, practical curriculum, and helpful alumni networks. A small percentage (around 3%) cite issues with management, communication, and organization.

All four reviews are positive, averaging 4.5/5 stars. Students appreciate the international environment, knowledgeable professors, and encouragement of entrepreneurial thinking. No negative feedback was received.

With an average rating of 5/5 and 100% positive feedback, students praise exceptional academic standards and dedicated faculty. They also highlight the university's focus on shaping empathetic humans with a commitment to social justice and positive global impact.

Most student feedback is positive (~63% 4-5 stars), highlighting excellent pedagogy, practical experiences, and supportive staff. The average rating is 3.81/5, with no negative reviews.

With an average rating of 4.5/5 based on 12 reviews, approximately 92% of feedback is positive, highlighting independent learning opportunities, practical professors, and a good study abroad experience. A small portion (~8%) of reviews express dissatisfaction with limited extracurriculars and job opportunities.

Rating distribution
5★
45%
44%
49%
50%
200%
21%
67%
4★
55%
46%
42%
50%
0%
50%
25%
3★
0%
10%
7%
0%
0%
43%
0%
2★
0%
0%
2%
0%
0%
0%
8%
1★
3%
0%
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Exemplary institution

The school stands out as an exemplary institution with commendable features. The accommodation facilities are not only comfortable but also designed to foster a conducive learning environment. The faculty comprises diverse, highly qualified educators, ensuring a high standard of education. The emphasis on practical learning prepares students effectively for real-world scenarios. The institution offers a top-notch academic experience combined with excellent living standards, making it a highly recommended choice for those seeking quality education.

Positive feedback

Very good program offering rich training in different sectors of the commerce sector. The establishment has good infrastructure. She offers us good working materials for our projects. The Grenoble campus is not the best in France, but still very good There is a gym, classes, well equipped, amphitheatres, quite large and a beautiful cafeteria, it's not great luxury, but it has everything you need In our program, especially my year, we are lucky to have very good teachers who listen and who train us in an excellent way. This school nevertheless lacks international students compared to the top 5 of École de France, a business

Experience in School

My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Learning in a practical way

This university has a lot of qualities such as adapting to students in order to optimize learning, and the desire to confront the student as quickly as possible with the world of work. On the other hand, I would criticize this school for poorly disseminated information and a gloomy community life.

For the love of Schiller

Schiller university is the best thing that can ever happen to anyone l will never regret the day l applied and l mostly love their campus in Germany it has nice aesthetics and obviously l love their culture

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close