Université de Bourgogne - UB vs emlyon business school vs SKEMA Business School vs Burgundy School of Business vs Excelia Business School

Side-by-side comparison from 340 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Université de Bourgogne - UB: wins 0/7 categories
emlyon business school: wins 4/7 categories
SKEMA Business School: wins 3/7 categories
Burgundy School of Business: wins 0/7 categories
Excelia Business School: wins 0/7 categories
School of Wine & Spirits Business: wins 0/7 categories
CESI: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Computer Science
Best programme: Programme Grande Ecole (PGE)
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Banking
La Rochelle, France
4.10
Read more reviews
67 reviews
×
Best programme: Master of Science (MSc)
Aix en Provence, France
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
4.16
4.23
Win
3.63
4.02
Not rated
Not rated
Location
3.70
4.54
Win
4.32
4.44
4.30
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
3.97
4.05
4.37
Win
4.22
3.91
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
4.06
4.56
Win
4.43
3.78
4.30
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.09
4.24
4.25
Win
4.22
4.25
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.00
4.40
Win
4.09
3.78
3.91
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
3.84
3.94
Win
3.70
3.56
3.66
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Dedicated and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Practical skill development and personal growth
  • +Welcoming and inspiring campus environment
  • +Practical, international, and globally-minded programs with diverse student body.
  • +Strong focus on professional development through internships and career support.
  • +Rich program offerings with opportunities for personal and academic growth.
  • +Practical skills and real-world business application
  • +International environment and diverse experiences
  • +Career development and professional growth
  • +Experienced and approachable instructors
  • +Practical, relevant curriculum
  • +Supportive environment and good location
  • +Practical learning, internships, and experienced instructors.
  • +International exposure and multicultural environment.
  • +High-quality teaching and good course content.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are a common complaint.
  • -Course content and teaching quality are frequently criticized.
  • -Lack of practical learning and perceived filler content.
  • -Unfair and frustrating grading, especially for group projects.
  • -Poor professor engagement and program support.
  • -Administrative & management issues
  • -Poor communication and guidance
  • -Outdated facilities and teaching faculty
  • -Administrative and management issues hinder program quality.
  • -Program value is not commensurate with the high tuition fees.
  • -Superficial academic content and lack of practical value.
  • -Ineffective career support, including internships and apprenticeships.
  • -Courses not aligning with student expectations or career goals.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Performance shows a very strong showing in Student Life and Internationality, both scoring over 4.0. Facilities and Value also received high marks, hitting a 4.0 average. The university's weakest area is Professors, with a rating just under 4.0.

Reviewing the provided ratings, the institution demonstrates notable strengths in **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving scores above 4.5. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerged as the area with the lowest rating, falling below 4.0. Other categories, including Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Value, all scored commendably, generally ranging between 4.05 and 4.4.

Across surveyed categories, this institution demonstrates robust strengths in **Internationality (4.43)** and **Professors (4.37)**. Student life, location, and facilities also received positive scores. However, **Accomodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at **3.70**, suggesting potential room for improvement in that specific aspect. The overall value is also rated favorably at 4.09.

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in several key areas, with location receiving the highest marks at 4.44. Professors and student life also scored very well, both at 4.22. Conversely, accommodation and facilities represent the weakest aspects, with scores of 3.56 and 3.63 respectively. The university shows a moderate performance in internationality and value.

Performing exceptionally well, this university boasts its strongest ratings in **Location** (4.30) and **Internationality** (4.30), closely followed by **Student Life** (4.25). Areas for potential improvement include **Accomodation**, which received the lowest score at 3.66, and **Professors** and **Value**, both rated at 3.91. The **Facilities** score stands at a respectable 4.02.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With ~100% positive feedback from 34 reviews and an average rating of 4.03/5, students highlight respected faculty, practical programs, and an inclusive campus culture. No negative reviews were provided.

The vast majority of reviews (around 98%) are positive, praising the program's academic rigor, international environment, and career support. A small percentage of feedback (about 2%) expressed disappointment with limited practical learning and grading fairness.

With a 4.37/5 average rating from 175 reviews, approximately 97.7% of students provide positive feedback. Key highlights include practical skills, international opportunities, and professional development. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions poor management and organization.

The majority of reviews (~89%) are positive, highlighting knowledgeable professors, practical courses, and a supportive environment. A small amount of negative feedback (~11%) exists, with one reviewer feeling the cost was not justified.

With a 4.07/5 average, ~82% of reviews are positive, highlighting international opportunities, practical learning, and a multicultural environment. A small ~4.5% of feedback is negative, citing superficial course coverage and limited practical value.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
18%
58%
50%
33%
31%
0%
0%
4★
68%
29%
41%
33%
51%
0%
0%
3★
15%
11%
7%
22%
13%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
1%
0%
3%
0%
0%
1★
0%
2%
1%
11%
1%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Class of 2018, Int'l Business Administration

Studying at Skema Business School in Sophia Antipolis was a fantastic experience. The campus is modern and located in a wonderful tech hub. The professors bring real-world business experience to the classroom. I loved the multicultural environment and the group projects. Skema gave me great friends, a strong global network, and the right skills for my career.

Just a big NO-NO

As an international student attending the MBA WINE AND SPIRITS BUSINESS program and spending 32 thousand euros (besides the need of quitting my job, move, find an accommodation and change lifestyle) I would say that the school is worth less then half of what it costs. The only good aspects of it are the big students’ communities, the commitment of the international office and the quality of some teachers who cannot really give their best because they’re hampered by the strict organisation of the school programs. Administration, services and the overall school organisation are really below expectations and the educational level is just average despite the cost and the “reputation”. Everyone (classmates, other international students and french ones from all courses and years) complained about the fact that “the school used to be a good one, but now is just bad”!

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close