Ghent University vs University of Antwerp vs Kask & Conservatorium School of Arts Gent - KASK vs Hogeschool Gent - HoGent vs Artevelde University of Applied Sciences
Side-by-side comparison from 179 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High quality education and engaging professors
- +Supportive learning environment and practical experience
- +Vibrant student city and social life
- +Engaging and well-structured programmes with relevant, practical content.
- +Approachable and knowledgeable professors fostering a welcoming, collaborative atmosphere.
- +Opportunities for networking and building a strong social and professional community.
- +Supportive staff and practical assistance for students
- +Dedicated instructors offering extra help and resources
- +Opportunities for internships and organized excursions
- +Excellent teaching and accessible resources
- +Practical, field-relevant learning experiences
- +Positive and effective university system
- +Supportive and approachable staff and coaches
- +Practical, practice-oriented teaching methodology
- +Welcoming atmosphere and opportunities to connect with peers
- +Hands-on practical learning
- +Industry-relevant skills and job preparation
- +Supportive and approachable faculty
- +Practical, real-world business experience and skill development.
- +Unique global mobility and diverse cultural immersion opportunities.
- +Valuable industry connections and strong peer networking.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a recurring problem.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and curriculum gaps lead to dissatisfaction.
- -Intense academic pressure negatively impacts student mental health.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
- -Lack of consistent and competent teaching staff.
- -Poor administrative support and organization.
- -Unsupportive and unprofessional interactions with staff.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of engagement and ineffective teaching methods are common complaints.
- -Negative staff and teacher attitudes created a disrespectful and unsupportive learning environment.
- -Communication and administrative issues were a persistent source of frustration.
- -Some facilities and technological resources were outdated and insufficient.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Communication from the institution is frequently unclear or lacking.
This institution garners high marks in several key areas, with exceptional scores for Professors, Student Life, and Internationality all at 4.32. Facilities also score well at 4.31. Accommodation and Value are also strong, reflecting a generally positive student experience. The weakest area is Location, which received a lower rating.
This institution receives favorable marks across multiple aspects. Its professors are particularly well-regarded, standing out as its strongest area. While accommodation and internationality also received solid scores, internationality is rated slightly lower compared to other surveyed categories. Overall, the university presents a generally positive picture with key strengths in academic instruction.
This university presents a uniform evaluation across all assessed aspects, with no standout strengths or weaknesses. Every category, including Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value, received a rating of zero. This suggests a consistent, albeit low, performance level across the board, indicating areas where significant improvements may be necessary in all surveyed domains.
This institution receives strong marks in several key areas, notably Professors, Location, Accomodation, and Value, all scoring a solid 4 out of 5. Student Life and Internationality also perform well, averaging approximately 3.67. The weakest area appears to be Facilities, which received a rating of 3.33, indicating room for improvement in this category.
An overview of the university's ratings indicates strengths in its **Location**, scoring the highest at 4.44, closely followed by **Professors** (4.21) and **Internationality** (4.24). **Student Life** also received a solid 4.2. The areas with the lowest scores are **Accomodation** at 3.68 and **Facilities** at 3.92. **Value** sits comfortably in the mid-range at 4.05.
An excellent overall assessment is evident, with the university excelling particularly in **Value** and **Internationality**, both receiving top marks. **Location** also garners a strong score. The **Student Life** category, while still positive, shows a slightly lower rating compared to other aspects.
This institution demonstrates a consistently strong performance across key areas. It excels particularly in **Internationality**, **Student Life**, and **Location**, all receiving top marks. **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Accomodation** also score highly. The **Value** proposition is well-regarded. While all ratings are impressive, the slight difference in scores suggests that the unique global atmosphere, vibrant campus experience, and convenient setting are standout features.
With an average rating of 4.29/5 from 56 reviews, ~98% of feedback is positive. Students praise the high educational standards, vibrant student city, user-friendly learning platforms, and approachable, enthusiastic professors. No negative feedback was recorded.
University feedback is highly positive, with ~97% of 37 reviews rating it 4-5 stars. Students praise well-planned courses, excellent lecturers, and a welcoming, inspiring atmosphere. One review mentioned study pressure and mental health concerns.
With an average rating of 4/5, the sole review for KASK highlights exceptional support and internship opportunities for international students. Although classes are primarily in Dutch, professors offer extra help to ensure understanding.
Two out of three reviews are positive, with praise for teachers and program structure. One review expresses dissatisfaction with teacher availability and support services.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~87% of feedback being highly favorable. Students appreciate practical teaching, dedicated staff, and personal support. No negative reviews were recorded.
With an average rating of 4.46, approximately 92% of reviews are positive, highlighting hands-on learning, practical skills for industry, and approachable teachers. One negative review mentioned disrespectful staff attitudes.
Most student reviews are highly positive, with ~83% rating 4-5 stars and an average of 4.5/5. Recurring themes include brilliant concepts, learning by doing, and valuable real-world business experience. Minimal negative feedback was noted.
Ghent University is an ideal location for students. It has excellent facilities and a picturesque campus, and it's set in a charming town. The faculty are dedicated to supporting students and making sure they understand the material. Overall, I couldn't be happier with my choice to study here. I feel lucky to be part of such a wonderful university.
I would like to express my sincere appreciation for the excellent Legal Technology and Responsible AI Programme. The programme provided a valuable opportunity to deepen my understanding of the legal, regulatory, and technological issues surrounding artificial intelligence and data governance. In particular, I would like to thank Prof. Dr. Jan Blockx for his outstanding academic leadership and engaging lectures. The course content was well-structured, insightful, and highly relevant to current developments in technology law. His ability to connect legal theory with practical challenges helped participants better understand the opportunities and risks associated with AI and emerging technologies. I would also like to express my gratitude to Prof. Toon Calders for his excellent contribution to the programme. His clear and accessible explanations of AI concepts provided an important technical perspective that complemented the legal discussions. The interdisciplinary approach greatly enhanced the overall learning experience and strengthened participants' understanding of responsible AI. In addition, I would like to thank Nele Voorspoels for her exceptional administrative support. Her prompt communication, attention to detail, and assistance with travel ensured a smooth and enjoyable experience throughout the course. Overall, the programme exceeded my expectations. The combination of high-quality teaching, excellent organization, and meaningful discussions created an inspiring learning environment.
KASK was my host university for my Erasmus studies. It was the first time my university sent someone for Erasmus and they helped with all posible, they provided me with a spot in the residence, and with an internship in one of the professor's architecture studio. Clases are mostly in dutch, so it's not the most suitable place for an Erasmus student, still the teacher always offered to stay after class to go throw the main points in order to make sure I would understand. They also organise trips for the students, they would even put me in contact with a local student in case I would have any doubts, so she would help me out. The building was absolutely beautiful and quite close to the center. Public transport is a close option, but the best to move around and go to the university is the bike. Will definitely go say hi next time I go back to Ghent.
We didn't have a biology teacher for a full year. 4 different substitute teachers that weren't informed well by HoGent. The arts class is very educational, but the teacher is not objectieve at all. Was talking to the internship supporter, she doesn't let jou talk. Can't get a word in between. Very annoying. I don't feel like she cared to listen. She doesn't care. It's not okey! Don't expect support. There are some really sweet teachers. But overall no great support or organization.
I like how you can directly talk to teachers without feeling like there's this hierarchy. I dislike how unorganised things can be such as: poor communication, poor planning: last minute timing etc.... Having a decent study track coach really helps with everything, because this is the individual that knows a lot about your study progress and who you are normally the most in contact with. Which in my case helped me a lot with all types of processes. Such as: admin work, advice on academic goals, future goals related to academia etc... The negative point for Artevelde would also be that they do not provide any parking for students. Therefore, students have to pay a hefty amount to park their car on the street(s) near campus. Meanwhile other universities/hogeschool in Ghent do provide plenty of this. I'd call it absolute greed because they are more than able to provide, instead they like to hoard the parking spaces. For the language courses, there should be more options than the ones they offer, because the major I'm in (international organisation and management) is full of international students and not everyone wants to study: French, Dutch, Spanish or German.... there should be more options... The other issue in my opinion would be that Artevelde is a "Applied Sciences school" which means, if you want to obtain a master degree afterwards, you can't just directly study one, when you're in Belgium or most of the neighbouring countries, you'd have to do a bridging year (a prep year).
Following the Advanced bachelor of bioinformatics in Howest Hogeschool, I have to say that is a really well structured program that targets to bridge the gap between theory and working environment and give you the necessary supplies to build up your future ! Professors are are really approachable and willing to help you.
Being here has been such a wild ride. Moving to a new country every semester and learning local languages has been both fun and challenging, but it's kinda exhausting too. Still, that hustle gives me an adrenaline rush I low-key love! The best part has been seeing our business ideas come to life and when people genuinely appreciate and engage with something we’ve built, it makes all the hard work worth it.
