Central European University - CEU vs Budapest Business University - BBU vs Budapest University of Technology and Economics - BME vs Eötvös Loránd University - ELTE vs Corvinus University of Budapest - BCE
Side-by-side comparison from 134 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Diverse student body and international perspective
- +High academic rigor and intellectual stimulation
- +Expert faculty and dedicated mentorship
- +Practical knowledge and real-world application
- +Knowledgeable and supportive professors
- +Strong student support and well-structured courses
- +High academic standards and quality engineering programs
- +Capable and friendly professors
- +Supportive study environment and technological innovations
- +Excellent professors and clear explanations
- +Rigorous and well-structured programs
- +Broad and interesting academic opportunities
- +Strong economics and business programs
- +Supportive and expert faculty and staff
- +International atmosphere and location
- +Strong international focus and diverse programs
- +Excellent networking opportunities and alumni network
- +Engaging learning environment and helpful professors
- +Unique, broad, and exploratory learning approach
- +Modern, open-minded environment
- -Rigid academic structure and lack of intellectual engagement.
- -Insufficient financial aid and rising tuition fees.
- -Poor communication and administrative issues.
- -Unprofessional teaching staff and language barriers.
- -Disorganized structure and struggles with course registration.
- -Administrative and organizational issues, combined with underpaid and unmotivated staff, create a negative learning environment.
- -Outdated study programs fail to meet current academic standards.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration and inefficiency.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning and comfort.
- -Lack of clear communication and student support creates confusion and dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are frequently cited.
- -There is a general dissatisfaction with the curriculum and teaching quality.
- -Irrelevant courses and unqualified instructors are a common complaint.
- -The high cost of tuition for subpar offerings is a significant detractor.
- -Lack of practical skills and real-world application in the curriculum.
Internationality stands out as the strongest area, achieving an impressive rating. Conversely, facilities present the weakest aspect, with a score of 3.56. Other areas like professors and student life received strong marks, while location, accommodation, and value also scored positively, indicating a generally well-regarded institution with distinct strengths and some room for improvement in its physical infrastructure.
This university garners a strong overall rating, with Location emerging as its most celebrated aspect. Professors and Value are also highly regarded. Conversely, Accomodation received the lowest score. Student Life and Facilities are mid-range, while Internationality is also a notable strength. The university presents a generally positive picture, with distinct areas of excellence and areas for potential improvement.
This university garners impressive marks, particularly excelling in its **Location**, which achieved a near-perfect score. **Facilities** and **Student Life** also stand out with robust ratings. While the university performs well in **Internationality** and **Value**, areas like **Professors** and **Accommodations** received comparatively lower, though still respectable, scores.
This university garners high marks in several key areas, with **Location** standing out as its strongest attribute at 4.63. **Internationality** and **Value** also received very favorable scores, reflecting strengths in global appeal and perceived worth. Conversely, **Accommodations** present the weakest area, scoring notably lower than other categories. **Professors** and **Student Life** are rated positively, indicating solid performance in teaching and campus experience.
The university demonstrates excellent performance in several key areas, with location receiving the highest marks. Facilities and student life are also rated highly. While accommodations are generally positive, they represent the lowest-rated aspect of the university experience. Overall, the institution presents a strong offering with particularly notable strengths in its physical environment and student engagement.
This university's strengths lie significantly in its **Internationality**, rated at 4.29, and **Student Life** and **Professors**, both scoring a high 4.14. However, **Accomodation** emerges as the weakest area, with a considerably lower rating of 2.86. Other aspects like Facilities (3.57), Location (3.71), and Value (4) fall within a moderate to good range.
This university presents a generally positive but mixed picture. Its strongest areas include Internationality, scoring a solid 4. Professors also received a commendable rating of 3.67. Conversely, Student Life and Accommodation are its weakest points, both averaging a 3. Facilities, Location, and Value are all rated moderately at 3.33.
~70% of reviews are positive, highlighting diversity, teaching methods, and faculty expertise. ~20% of feedback is negative, citing rigid academic structure and a lack of critical engagement.
~57% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical knowledge and professional, up-to-date teachers. ~9.5% of feedback indicates issues with communication and organization.
With an average rating of 4.12/5, approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong academic programs, capable professors, and a good study environment. A small portion of feedback (~3%) mentions issues with outdated facilities or organizational challenges.
Most university student feedback (approximately 74%) is positive, highlighting rigorous programs, knowledgeable professors, and a good community. Some students noted minor administrative disorganization and issues with professors' English proficiency.
With an average rating of 4.28/5 from 18 reviews, approximately 100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight strong Economics and Business programs, international atmosphere, and a strategic campus location. No negative reviews were recorded.
~86% of reviews are positive, highlighting international exposure, networking, and good professors. Some negative feedback (~14%) mentioned irrelevant courses and teachers.
With an average rating of 3/5, student feedback is mixed. Approximately 33% of reviews are negative, citing a lack of technical skills and real-world experience. Positive comments highlight the university's unique, modern, and open-minded approach.
Nothing to show
The environment is good and it’s multicultural The compound is really nice but a bit far(depending on the faculty) They should have a sports team because of the facilities that they have They should really consider the sports career of the university
When I was admitted to BME, I had high expectations. Coming from a successful high school background with strong foundations in algebra, informatics, and physics, I was confident and motivated to thrive in a top European engineering university. Unfortunately, my experience at BME has not lived up to my expectations—especially as an international student. 1. Administrative and Structural Discrimination One of the biggest disappointments has been the clear separation between Hungarian, Erasmus, and international students. Almost every event is divided by nationality, creating silos instead of an inclusive academic community. Even basic facilities like dormitories are unequally allocated—Hungarian students are placed near the campus, while many international students, including myself, are forced to live in dormitories located in entirely different cities. This makes commuting to university both time-consuming and costly. Administrative support is also extremely lacking for non-Hungarians. The bureaucracy is slow, confusing, and often indifferent toward international students’ concerns. It often feels like we are not valued or even acknowledged unless we are fluent in Hungarian. 2. Unequal Treatment and Favoritism Although BME promotes itself as an international institution, there is clear favoritism in student selection and treatment—particularly towards Arabic students. While the university’s rector is of Arabic origin, it seems that this has led to an overwhelming admission of students from the same background (up to 80% in some departments), and unfortunately, favoritism in how rules are applied. There are PhD students, also from similar backgrounds, who act as teaching assistants and display bias based on religion or ethnicity. I personally faced hostility after expressing differing views in a discussion, and it escalated to verbal and physical aggression from fellow students. Even worse, some instructors allow academic dishonesty to take place openly, turning a blind eye when favored students cheat during exams. 3. Quality of Teaching Academically, the quality of instruction has also been underwhelming. Many professors are very senior, but unfortunately, many are disconnected from modern technological developments. They are often unapproachable, angry, and do not welcome questions. Some professors struggle with basic English, which makes lectures difficult to follow, especially in technical subjects. This severely affects the learning experience for international students. --- Final Thoughts If you're considering studying at BME as an international student, especially if you're seeking a collaborative, forward-thinking academic environment and fair treatment, I urge you to do thorough research and consider your options carefully. My personal experience has been marked by exclusion, inequality, and a lack of academic and personal support. Higher education should be a space for growth, innovation, and inclusion,but sadly, that has not been my experience at BME.
There is a big variety of departments to choose from, including ones that are the only available ones within the country. Unfortunately on the other hand, the organization and communication of the institution was not on the level of quality that one would expect from one of the top universities in the country. Regarding the quality of education, I had very mixed experiences as there are big differences within the departments and among the professors.
Previously studying in the USA, moving to Budapest was a complete culture shock. However, this university offers a vigorous program with ample opportunities for students who want a career in diplomacy and foreign affairs. I feel constantly challenged and surrounded by bright-minded thinkers. Throwing myself into a new country, new culture, and new language has allowed me to truly be immersed in this field of study. While the program is in English, there are ample opportunities for additional foreign language classes. The fact that this university offers scholarships and the base price of tuition is already so low, is an added bonus.
ESSCA School of Management is known for its international approach and diverse programs. In my opinion, many students appreciate its emphasis on experiential learning and the opportunities for international exposure through exchange programs and internships. However, some may find the workload demanding and challenging but that's the way it operates. Whether I recommend it would depend on your specific academic and career goals, as well as your preferences for learning style and environment. Likes/ Dislikes: *Essca provides enormous opportunities to improve and enhance your skill. *Diversified culture *Provides webinars and seminars across all the campuses. *Workload Management could be seen as an disadvantage. As sometimes, you may find it very challenging.
Nothing to show
