EADA Business School vs ESERP Business School vs EU Business School vs GBSB Global Business School vs UIC Barcelona
Side-by-side comparison from 649 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Excellent, practical-focused instructors and engaging, well-organized programs.
- +Diverse international environment fostering strong peer relationships and real-world application.
- +Modern, business-centric atmosphere and interactive learning experiences.
- +Practical learning & real-world application
- +Strong marketing & business programmes
- +Supportive environment & professional development
- +Supportive and approachable staff and teachers
- +Interactive classes with practical applications
- +International and diverse student environment
- +Expert faculty and engaging curriculum
- +Practical, real-world application and career focus
- +Vibrant international community and personal growth
- +Excellent academic quality and well-prepared graduates
- +Supportive and international student community
- +Engaging and knowledgeable faculty
- +Supportive and knowledgeable lecturers
- +Practical and well-structured courses
- +Welcoming and diverse international environment
- +Engaging, practical, and relevant course content
- +Expert professors and supportive staff
- +Real-world application and industry connections
- -Administrative & management issues caused frustration and inflexibility.
- -Lack of expected program content and poor communication.
- -Arbitrary grading and insufficient focus on key program promises.
- -Poor management, organization, and academic support.
- -Outdated and low-quality facilities.
- -Deceptive marketing and unclear policies regarding student work.
- -Administrative and management issues are prevalent, including poor communication and unhelpful staff.
- -The quality of education is considered basic, with a lack of proper study facilities and accreditation concerns.
- -Extracurricular activities are not supported, and the university prioritizes attendance over educational quality.
- -Administrative and management issues cause disorganization and lack of support.
- -The academic quality is perceived as low, with ineffective teaching and irrelevant degrees.
- -Lack of career support, such as failing to help with internships, is a major concern.
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Unhelpful and indifferent staff.
- -Deceptive financial practices.
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor internship support and disregard for student complaints.
- -Inconsistent staff helpfulness and attitude.
- -Administrative and management issues create frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is a common complaint.
Overall, this university garners positive feedback across multiple aspects. The strongest area is Location, receiving an impressive 4.93. Student Life (4.56) and Facilities (4.51) also perform very well. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, scoring 4.14, while Value (4.44) is also a relative area for improvement.
This university receives excellent marks for its **location**, achieving a near-perfect score. **Internationality** also stands out as a strength. Conversely, **student life** is identified as the weakest area, with a significantly lower rating. While **facilities**, **professors**, and **value** are all rated well, **accommodation** is considered average.
Excelling in several key areas, this university boasts impressive scores for **Location** and **Internationality**, both near perfect. **Student Life** also received a very positive assessment. However, **Accomodation** stands out as a weaker point, receiving the lowest rating. The university also earned solid marks for **Facilities** and **Professors**, with **Value** falling in the mid-range.
A look at university ratings reveals strong points in **Internationality** (4.66) and **Location** (4.49), indicating a welcoming and accessible environment. Professors also received high marks (4.11) and student life is generally positive (3.83). The weakest area is **Accommodation**, with a significantly lower rating (2.79), suggesting this is an aspect that could be improved. The overall value is rated moderately (3.61), with facilities also receiving a similar score (3.34).
Overall, the university garners positive feedback, with **Professors** receiving the highest marks at 4.25, followed closely by **Facilities** at 4.17. **Student Life** is rated a respectable 3.75, while **Internationality** scores 3.83. Areas for potential improvement include **Accomodation**, which received the lowest rating of 3.33, and **Location** at 3.91. The university also scores well in **Value** at 3.92.
Academic and international aspects of the university are highly regarded, with Professors receiving an exceptional score of 4.63 and Internationality a strong 4.56. Location and Value also perform well, both exceeding 4.3. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, scoring 3.69. Facilities and Student Life are rated moderately well, around 4.05 and 4.32 respectively.
With overwhelmingly positive feedback, this institution shines brightest in its facilities, professors, student life, accommodation, and overall value, all receiving perfect scores. Areas like location and internationality also perform exceptionally well, scoring 4.8. The institution demonstrates a consistently high standard across all evaluated aspects.
With a 4.49/5 average rating, ~98% of reviews are positive, praising excellent teachers, a well-organized and interactive curriculum, and a strong international environment. A small percentage of feedback notes minor issues with course scheduling and program delivery.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting useful knowledge and good courses. A smaller portion (~8.3%) mentions poor organization and low-quality facilities.
Around 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong student-staff relationships and a welcoming atmosphere. However, about 7% of feedback notes disorganization, basic curriculum, and communication issues.
Around 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting community, atmosphere, and practical curriculum. Negative feedback, about 13%, mentions issues with program usefulness, administrative support, and organization.
With a 4.2/5 average rating from 15 reviews, ~93% are positive, highlighting strong academics, supportive classmates, and good job preparation. ~7% of feedback is negative, citing issues with unhelpful administration.
With an average rating of 4.58/5 from 43 reviews, ~93% are positive, highlighting supportive, knowledgeable lecturers, practical courses, and a welcoming, multicultural environment. A small ~4.7% of feedback expressed dissatisfaction with staff consistency and internship support.
All 7 reviews are positive (100%), with an average rating of 5/5. Students highly praise the innovative programs blending neuroscience with business and marketing, engaging classes, expert professors, and practical applications.
In my experience, this business school is considerably more hyped than the actual value it delivers. While the marketing and reputation may create high expectations, the learning experience often falls short. One of the biggest concerns is the lack of placement support. Students are largely expected to manage their career opportunities on their own, which can be disappointing given the investment made in the program. Academically, many subjects are covered only at a surface level. The curriculum tends to focus on providing a broad overview rather than developing deep understanding or practical expertise. Most topics are wrapped up in just one or two classes, which is rarely enough to gain meaningful knowledge or build strong skills. As a result, students are often left to do significant self-learning if they want to truly understand the material. While the school introduces a wide range of business concepts, it doesn't always provide the depth, rigour, or hands-on learning that many students expect from a quality business education. Overall, I found the institution to be somewhat overrated, with the reputation and hype exceeding the actual learning outcomes and career support provided.
I have completed my Marketing Degree at ESERP x Staffordshire program. It was useful, close to reality. The majority of professors were professional, except one who was constantly late for classes like 1 hour. After I complained about it, the situation got better, although my anonymity was not kept as it was promised, so do not believe that you can make anonymous complains - everything will be revealed.
As far as universities go I think EU business school comes first in terms of student-staff relationship. Every member of the staff I have encountered has been more than helpful. What i think should improve as even tho its not connected to my previous point is I think the school should have more leniency towards tuition payment specially to international students because we are here despite the challenges of having to find willing banks to exchange local currencies to Euros.
The overall experience was ok. Yet I dont feel that it was worth 10k€ a year for what I received. Starting from repetitive classes in each year but with a different name until not having bathrooms for almost 6 months. The quality of the majority of classes was 2/5. The content of the classes was not deep enough to teach you about tools, appliances, ways of solving, what should be taken into consideration. On my 2 last years. I took the exact same class of public relations but named differently. Not even the professor knew what to say any more. I didn’t saw not event one tool that is used in public relations. We analyzed just one case of public relations in the whole semester. And it was a mention not event a full analysis. I do not recommend GBSB. The internships they say the help you with on their webpage its a lie. They do not help you in any way to connect you with no company. They are not event informed in how to help you with the visa.
Classes are good, I would try to make them more interactive and with more practices in class. Professors normally are good, in the english course I believe the english of the teachers could be better specially if the course is taught in that language. I also believe professors could interact more with their students and try to get in contact with students they see may be struggling. Otherwise the campus, although a bit small is fine, really nice, the library could be a little bigger.
C3S is a very good Institution for International Students. The lecturers here are so enthusiastic and truly passionate about their subjects; their knowledge and encouragement make me feel ready for my future career. At C3S, I really felt like I belonged; the diversity is incredible, and everyone is genuinely kind. Plus, the support systems are really strong. The courses are top-notch, and the learning experience really sets you up for great career opportunities.
The classes are so intresting I love how they they teach you about psychology and business strategy, I really like how the teachers are real professionals in terms of marketing , buisness... overall I really enjoy it.
