EU Business School vs Karlsruhe Institute of Technology - KIT vs CBS International Business School - CBS vs Karlshochschule International University vs Karlsruhe University of Applied Sciences
Side-by-side comparison from 322 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Helpful professors and career support
- +Valuable practical and theoretical business knowledge
- +Enriching overall student experience
- +Extensive course customization and specialization options
- +Strong career support, networking, and good professors
- +Accessible campus and vibrant student life
- +Practical learning with real-world experience and project-based focus
- +Supportive and knowledgeable professors with a focus on student growth
- +International environment and networking opportunities
- +Collaborative and inclusive learning environment
- +Approachable and excellent professors
- +Internationality and diversity fostered
- +Strong blend of theory and practical application.
- +Excellent career prospects and job placement.
- +Rigorous and demanding curriculum.
- +Supportive people and approachable professors
- +Practical, real-world learning experiences
- +Strong networking and international community
- +Diverse student and educator backgrounds
- +Opportunities for personal and career growth
- +Supportive and organized academic environment
- -Administrative and management issues cause disorganization and lack of support.
- -Outdated facilities and a focus on attendance over quality education are criticized.
- -The educational program is perceived as basic and unaccredited in some regions.
- -Disorganized university systems and lack of breaks.
- -Administrative and management issues create a sense of being taken advantage of.
- -Inconsistent teacher quality is a recurring concern.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Facilities are described as outdated and in disrepair.
- -Course content and teaching methods are perceived as ineffective or irrelevant.
- -Outdated facilities and technology
- -Poor communication and administrative support
- -Lack of resources and academic guidance
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently criticized.
- -Administrative issues, including poor communication and disorganized processes, are a major source of frustration.
- -Lack of practical application and relevance in the curriculum disappoints students.
- -Limited extracurriculars and career opportunities.
- -Poor quality of facilities and overall environment.
- -Lack of academic rigor and student engagement.
This institution excels in several key areas, with Location and Internationality receiving the highest marks at 4.73. Student Life also scores well at 4.22. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, scoring 3.42, suggesting room for improvement. Facilities and Professors are rated consistently around 4.04, while Value sits at a respectable 3.87.
Overall, this institution garners a positive reception, particularly excelling in its **facilities** and **location**, both scoring very highly. **Value** also receives strong marks. The university's **student life** and **accommodation** are areas with room for improvement, scoring the lowest among the evaluated aspects. Its **professors** and **internationality** are rated solidly in the mid-range.
This university receives excellent feedback, particularly for its professors and internationality, both scoring approximately 4.48. Student life also scores highly at around 4.47. The weakest area is accommodation, with a rating of 3.61. Facilities are rated at 4.35, location at 4, and value at about 4.14, indicating generally positive perceptions across most aspects of the university experience.
An impressive profile emerges from these university ratings. Student life and internationality stand out with perfect scores, indicating a vibrant and globally diverse campus experience. Professors and location also received very strong marks, suggesting excellent academic support and a desirable setting. However, accommodation presents a notable weakness, rated significantly lower than other aspects.
With an impressive score of 4.67, the university excels in its **location**. **Student life** and **value** also received strong ratings at 4.0. Conversely, **internationality** is the weakest area, scoring 2.67. **Accomodation** and **professors** are rated moderately at 3.0, while **facilities** are slightly above average at 3.67.
Examining the provided ratings reveals a university excelling in several key aspects. Its location stands out with an impressive score of 4.89, closely followed by strong performance in internationality (4.8), facilities (4.6), student life (4.6), and professors (4.65). However, accommodation presents a clear area for improvement, scoring significantly lower at 3.25, while value remains solid at 4.55.
The university exhibits exceptional strengths in its location and internationality, both scoring a near-perfect 4.93. Professors also receive high marks at 4.64, complemented by strong student life (4.15) and value (4.29). The weakest areas are facilities, rated at 3.92, and accommodation, which received a 3.62.
Around 74% of reviews are positive, praising professors, career services, and valuable skills gained. The remaining ~7.6% of feedback expresses concerns about disorganization and the quality of education.
Most reviews are positive (~83%), praising excellent education, course customization, and networking opportunities. A small portion (~17%) mentions disorganization and lack of breaks.
With a 4.25/5 average rating from 24 reviews, ~92% of students had a positive experience. Praised themes include project-based learning, professors' real-world experience, and networking opportunities. A small ~4% of feedback mentioned administrative issues.
Students report a highly positive experience, citing collaborative, international, and diverse learning environments with approachable professors. The university fosters inclusivity and academic support, preparing graduates for their fields. One review noted high tuition fees could be better matched with practical resources.
With a 3.67 average rating from three reviews, sentiment is predominantly positive. One positive review highlighted a strong blend of theoretical and practical learning, leading to good job prospects. No negative feedback was recorded.
With an average rating of 4.76/5, ~100% of reviews are positive. Students highlight supportive professors, a personal learning environment with small classes, and practical, real-world experiences. No negative feedback was recorded.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with 13 out of 14 (93%) giving high ratings. Students praise the diverse educators and peer networks, cultural exposure, and opportunities for personal and academic growth. A small percentage of feedback (around 7%) mentions a lack of extracurricular activities and internship availability for earlier years.
As far as universities go I think EU business school comes first in terms of student-staff relationship. Every member of the staff I have encountered has been more than helpful. What i think should improve as even tho its not connected to my previous point is I think the school should have more leniency towards tuition payment specially to international students because we are here despite the challenges of having to find willing banks to exchange local currencies to Euros.
Nothing to show
I've had a good experience so far while I've been studying at CBS. However, the majority of students are of German nationality, while there are also students from other nations. If you're feeling under the weather or don't feel like going to school, they provide a blended learning option that allows you to stay at home and participate in the class simultaneously online. The campus in Cologne is not particularly cutting-edge, but I've heard that the campus in Mainz is more or less cutting-edge and attractive. The instructors and departmental officials are all cordial. The School encourages pupils to participate in a variety of sports because it values a healthy balance between work and recreation. As a result of CBS's partnerships with various significant businesses, the School is able to maintain its curricula current with the needs of the modern business world. Additionally, partnerships allow CBS to give its students greater options for internships and professional experience. By participating in business projects in collaboration with well-known companies, students can also gain important information and skills.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
My experience at KLU has truly been life-changing. This university has given me a second chance and opened the door to a completely new life filled with opportunities. From the very beginning, it has felt like a second home. What makes KLU so special is the people. Every single person here is supportive and genuinely willing to help. The professors are not only highly qualified and professional, but also approachable and always ready to guide you in any academic or professional matter. I have never been in a place like this before. The strong connection with industry, the quality of events, and the incredible network of classmates and alumni create the perfect environment for both personal and professional growth. I will always be grateful to KLU for everything I have experienced here.
I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.
