EU Business School vs IESE Business School vs Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich - LMU vs Technical University of Munich - TUM vs Macromedia University of Applied Sciences
Side-by-side comparison from 464 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Diverse international environment and networking opportunities
- +Experienced, knowledgeable, and supportive professors with real-world insights
- +Innovative and practical business programs
- +Inspiring cultural experiences and inclusive communities
- +Strong career advancement opportunities and alumni networks
- +High-quality academics and excellent faculty engagement
- +Strong academic programs with high-quality teaching and practical experience
- +Valuable international environment and diverse study options
- +Excellent value with zero tuition fees and research opportunities
- +Diverse and customizable specialization options
- +High academic standards and strong career prospects
- +Excellent support for international students
- +Broadened horizons and excellent networking
- +Valuable real-world experience through company work
- +Supportive and understanding staff
- +Welcoming staff, helpful student buddies, and supportive community
- +Strong industry co-op and career-focused programs
- +Excellent campus facilities and central Munich location
- +Relevant and varied course content
- +Helpful and educated faculty
- +Supportive university staff
- -Administrative disorganization and unhelpful staff cause significant problems.
- -The quality of education and academic rigor are considered poor.
- -Facilities and extracurricular support are severely lacking.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources negatively impact the learning experience.
- -Lack of communication and support from the institution is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder the learning experience.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and lack of course relevance are frequently criticized.
- -Administrative and management issues hinder student progress and fair assessment.
- -Outdated facilities and inefficient systems create frustrating learning environments.
- -Poor quality of education and lecturer qualifications.
- -High tuition fees disproportionate to class availability and contact hours.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are prevalent complaints.
- -Lack of effective communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
- -Lack of organization and clear communication from administration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
- -Uninspiring teaching methods and irrelevant curriculum.
Based on the provided ratings, this institution excels in **Location** and **Internationality**, both receiving a high score of 4.7. **Student Life** is also a strong point, rated at 4.22. The university's weakest area is **Accomodation**, which scores 3.44, indicating room for improvement in this aspect. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded experience with standout features.
Overall, the university garners strong student satisfaction. Its most highly rated aspects include Internationality (4.74), Location (4.73), and Student Life (4.70). Professors (4.62) and Value (4.64) also receive excellent scores. The weakest area, though still positive, is Accomodation at 4.09, while Facilities are rated at 4.36.
This university garners strong feedback across most aspects. Its highest-rated category is Facilities, closely followed by Value and Internationality. Student Life also receives positive scores. The area with the lowest rating, though still respectable, is Accomodation. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded and appealing environment for its students.
A notable range of scores characterizes this university's performance. Internationality stands out as the strongest area, reflecting a high degree of global engagement. Conversely, Accomodation received the lowest rating, suggesting this may be an area for improvement. Other categories like Facilities, Location, and Value also scored very well, indicating a generally positive university experience. Student Life and Professors also maintained respectable scores.
Examining the university's ratings reveals a mixed but generally positive picture. The institution excels particularly in **Internationality**, earning a high score. Strong performance is also noted for **Location** and **Professors**. Conversely, **Accomodation** and **Value** received the lowest ratings, indicating areas for potential improvement.
Considerably positive feedback is evident across most surveyed aspects. The university excels notably in **Internationality**, receiving its highest score, closely followed by **Professors** and **Value**. The weakest area is **Facilities**, which received the lowest rating. Other categories such as Location, Student Life, and Accomodation all received solid scores around the 4.0 mark.
With a perfect score of 5, location stands out as the university's strongest asset. Student life, however, received the lowest rating at 3.33. Facilities and internationality scored a respectable 3.67, while professors and value were rated highly at 4. Accommodations were rated at 3.
~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting diversity, experienced professors, and networking opportunities. A small minority of ~7.7% of feedback mentions disorganization and basic course content.
With a ~100% positive rating, reviews highlight exceptional experiences, transformative professional growth, and excellent faculty. Students praise the welcoming culture, global diversity, and strong career connections. No negative feedback was recorded.
Nearly all of the 48 reviews are positive, reflecting a high average rating of 4.06/5. Students praise academic quality, practical project experience, international environment, and program flexibility. No negative reviews were submitted.
With an average rating of 4.07/5 from 100 reviews, ~95% of students are positive. They highlight diverse specializations, high academic standards leading to good job prospects, and excellent professor support. A small ~2% of feedback mentioned overlapping course schedules.
With an average rating of 3/5 from three reviews, approximately 67% of feedback is negative. Students cite concerns about academic quality and value for money. One positive review highlighted broad horizons and networking opportunities.
All seven reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.43/5. Students praise the welcoming staff and students, English-taught programs, and strong industry connections. Accommodation and campus facilities are also highlighted.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%) with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise course content, helpful lecturers, and good accommodation. A few minor criticisms mention strict grading in one course and occasional unhelpful teachers.
Although I earned my bachelor degree at the University of York in UK, it was quite theoretical. I really started to bridge the learning gap between theory and practice only when I started to pursue my master degree in Business Analytics and Data Science at EU Business School in Barcelona. What stands out most in my current program is the university’s strong emphasis on practical experience. Our professors are not only scholars but also are successful business managers and data experts, as they are either the owners of successful organizations or individuals who took on top management roles in large corporations. Their teachings are more than just the syllabus in, they also provide personal experience in the area of niche markets, provide best practices in an industry, and always provoke our thinking with regard to the existing trends in higher education, business strategy, and innovation.
Being at IESE was one of the best experiences of my life: 1- Professionally: this MBA is one of the best connected schools with top consultancy and banking sectors. for example, the 3 MBBs come to the school to train and interview candidates, ensuring a higher successful rate. It allowed me to jump from a civil engineering position to work for McKinsey. 2- Personal and cultural : amazing transformative 2 years, with people from all over the world (73 nationalities in my class) with great values. Totally worthy it.
There are superior facilities at the FH Aachen. The tutorial halls and classes are sophisticated, equipped with the the current and innovative equipment, and the library is large and well-stocked. To guarantee that students have a positive college experience, the educational facility also offers a range of extracurricular activities and events.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Basically, it’s a private university with a good reputation and also the lecturers are well educated and helpful. The course contains 60% of management-related modules and the remaining technical modules. For anyone who is searching for a techno-management course, I would suggest Hochschule Fresenius.
