Instituto Químico de Sarriá - IQS vs EU Business School vs GBSB Global Business School vs Universitat CEU Abat Oliba - CEU UAO vs UIC Barcelona
Side-by-side comparison from 314 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical work and supportive staff
- +Rewarding connections and tranquil atmosphere
- +Convenient location and nice facilities
- +Expert professors and practical, real-world business insights
- +Diverse international environment and networking opportunities
- +Innovative, engaging, and practical business programs
- +Engaged and knowledgeable professors
- +Diverse and high-quality student community
- +Well-structured learning and supportive environment
- +Supportive faculty and staff
- +Modern facilities and resources
- +Academic excellence and innovative methodology
- +Excellent academic programs and knowledgeable, kind professors.
- +Supportive and collaborative student atmosphere.
- +Strong preparation for career success and international outlook.
- +Specialized sports management content and expert professors
- +Valuable industry connections and networking opportunities
- +Welcoming atmosphere and excellent staff support
- +Integrated marketing, psychology, and neuroscience curriculum
- +Expert instructors and supportive staff
- +Practical application and industry connections
- -Unhelpful or inaccessible staff and administrative issues.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance of buildings.
- -Limited career support and irrelevant course content.
- -Administrative and management issues disrupt student experience and support.
- -Educational quality is perceived as basic, with a lack of proper study facilities and unreliable academic guidance.
- -Extracurricular activities and career prospects are not adequately supported or facilitated by the university.
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor organization and lack of support.
- -Low educational level and irrelevant degree programs.
- -Inadequate facilities and unfulfilled internship promises.
- -Poor management and unqualified staff.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment.
- -Lack of administrative support and disorganization.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Lack of support and indifferent attitude from staff create a negative experience.
- -Poor quality of instruction and unengaging student discussions.
- -Ineffective project management and lack of professional experience among peers.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources are a recurring problem.
- -Communication is often poor, leading to confusion and unmet expectations.
An overall assessment reveals the university excels in its facilities, earning a high 4.5-star rating. Student life and accommodation also score well at 4.33. The weakest area, however, is the professors, with a rating of 3.67. Location, internationality, and value all received solid 4-star ratings, indicating a generally positive but not perfect student experience.
This institution garners its highest marks in Internationality (4.7) and Location (4.68), indicating excellent global connections and a desirable setting. Student Life also scores well at 4.2. Conversely, Accomodation presents as the weakest area with a rating of 3.49, while Value is moderately rated at 3.87. Facilities and Professors both receive solid scores above 4.0.
Reviewing the provided ratings reveals a mixed but generally positive picture. The university excels in **Internationality** and **Location**, boasting the highest scores. **Professors** also receive strong marks. Conversely, **Accomodation** is the clear weakest area, significantly underperforming compared to other categories. **Facilities** and **Student Life** fall in the mid-range, while **Value** presents a solid, above-average rating.
This university garners strong approval, particularly for its **accommodation**, which achieved the highest rating. Facilities and student life also scored well. Conversely, **internationality** received the lowest rating among the surveyed aspects. Professors, location, and value for money are all rated at a solid 4 out of 5.
The university demonstrates particular strengths in its academic offerings, with **Professors** receiving a high rating of 4.27. **Facilities** are also well-regarded at 4.09. Areas for improvement are evident in **Accomodation**, which scored lowest at 3.33. Other aspects like Location, Student Life, Internationality, and Value are rated moderately.
Across several key areas, the institution receives commendable ratings. Its strongest performances are noted in Value and Internationality, both achieving near-perfect scores. Professors also garnered exceptionally high marks. The weakest area is Location, which, while still positive, is rated lower than other aspects. Student Life, Accomodation, and Facilities all fall within a strong middle range.
Across all evaluated aspects, this institution demonstrates exceptional strength. It achieves a perfect score of 5 in every category, including Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value. This indicates a consistently outstanding experience for students in all surveyed areas, with no single category performing weaker than others.
With a 3.33 average rating, reviews are largely positive, highlighting practical work, friendly staff, and good facilities. No negative feedback was reported.
~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting knowledgeable professors, international environments, and practical, engaging courses. About 8% of feedback is negative, citing disorganization and a perceived lack of educational quality.
Around 74% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable and engaged lecturers, a diverse community, and well-structured assignments. A small percentage (around 10%) express dissatisfaction with program usefulness and administrative support.
Most reviews praise the academic environment, dedicated professors, and supportive staff. A small percentage of feedback mentions issues with a specific director and teacher hiring practices.
With an average rating of 4.21/5, approximately 86% of reviews are positive, praising the collaborative atmosphere, quality programs, and accessible location. One review (around 7%) cites issues with indifferent administration.
University students largely praise the insightful sports management content, quality professors, and valuable networking opportunities, with a ~96% positive sentiment. A small fraction of feedback (~4%) mentions issues with academic support variability or program depth.
All 6 reviews were positive, giving an average of 5/5 stars. Students highlighted the program's blend of marketing, psychology, and neuroscience, and found classes engaging and practical. Professors were professional and supportive.
Nothing to show
Although I earned my bachelor degree at the University of York in UK, it was quite theoretical. I really started to bridge the learning gap between theory and practice only when I started to pursue my master degree in Business Analytics and Data Science at EU Business School in Barcelona. What stands out most in my current program is the university’s strong emphasis on practical experience. Our professors are not only scholars but also are successful business managers and data experts, as they are either the owners of successful organizations or individuals who took on top management roles in large corporations. Their teachings are more than just the syllabus in, they also provide personal experience in the area of niche markets, provide best practices in an industry, and always provoke our thinking with regard to the existing trends in higher education, business strategy, and innovation.
My program here has many outstanding aspects, but one that stands out is the quality of the faculty. They are not only experienced professionals but also active researchers. Their expertise and insights make the program even stronger, especially because they are thorough and ensure each student grasps the material.
Nothing to show
Classes are good, I would try to make them more interactive and with more practices in class. Professors normally are good, in the english course I believe the english of the teachers could be better specially if the course is taught in that language. I also believe professors could interact more with their students and try to get in contact with students they see may be struggling. Otherwise the campus, although a bit small is fine, really nice, the library could be a little bigger.
A perfect synergy between theoretical knowledge, practical application, and high-quality networking. After completing the Master in Sport Management at Johan Cruyff Institute, I took a major step forward in my career in the sports industry. What truly sets this institution apart is the closeness and support of the professors and staff, as well as the enriching experiences shared with fellow students. Without a doubt, it has been one of the most transformative decisions of my life.
The classes are so intresting I love how they they teach you about psychology and business strategy, I really like how the teachers are real professionals in terms of marketing , buisness... overall I really enjoy it.
