Budapest Business University - BBU vs Budapest University of Technology and Economics - BME vs IBS International Business School - IBS vs Corvinus Business School vs Kodolányi János University - KJU
Side-by-side comparison from 76 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical knowledge and real-world application
- +Knowledgeable and supportive professors
- +Strong student support and well-structured courses
- +High academic standards and quality engineering programs
- +Capable and friendly professors
- +Good facilities and central city location
- +Diverse international student body and cultural exchange
- +Practical, real-world applicable knowledge and career opportunities
- +Excellent teaching staff and flexible class schedules
- +Challenging and skill-enriching academic environment
- +Positive overall experience despite external factors
- +Supportive scholarship opportunities
Nothing to show
- +Friendly, international learning environment
- +Supportive professors, practical business concepts
- +Organized classes, useful study materials
Nothing to show
- -Poor communication and administrative issues.
- -Unprofessional teaching staff and language barriers.
- -Disorganized structure and struggles with course registration.
- -Administrative and organizational issues, including a lack of professors and unmotivated staff.
- -Outdated study programs.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of clear communication and support creates uncertainty for students.
- -Administrative and management issues are a constant source of frustration.
- -Facilities are often outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Course content and teaching methods are frequently seen as unengaging and irrelevant.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from instructors is a common complaint.
Nothing to show
This university garners a strong overall rating, with Location emerging as its most celebrated aspect. Professors and Value are also highly regarded. Conversely, Accomodation received the lowest score. Student Life and Facilities are mid-range, while Internationality is also a notable strength. The university presents a generally positive picture, with distinct areas of excellence and areas for potential improvement.
A comprehensive review indicates a strong university profile. The location stands out with an exceptional rating of 4.84. Conversely, accommodation received the lowest score at 3.78. Other areas like facilities (4.38), student life (4.29), and internationality (4.13) also scored well. Professors (3.91) and value (4.03) were rated moderately.
This university garners impressive scores across multiple aspects. Internationality stands out as its strongest area, followed closely by professors and value. On the other hand, location and accommodation received the lowest ratings, though still within a generally positive range. Overall, student life and facilities also scored well, contributing to a solid academic profile.
This institution garners exceptional marks for its **location, student life, internationality, and overall value**, all receiving perfect scores. The quality of its **professors** is also highly praised. However, areas for improvement are evident in **facilities and accommodation**, which received lower, albeit still adequate, ratings.
Nothing to show
Overall, this institution demonstrates a solid performance across multiple facets of student experience. Its location receives the highest mark, a testament to its desirable setting. Conversely, accommodation stands out as the weakest area, suggesting potential room for improvement in this regard. Other aspects like facilities, professors, student life, internationality, and value are all rated positively, indicating a well-rounded educational environment.
Nothing to show
~57% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical knowledge and professional, up-to-date teachers. ~9.5% of feedback indicates issues with communication and organization.
Around 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting rewarding academics and capable professors. Some reviews mention high academic standards and good facilities. A small amount of negative feedback notes a lack of professors and outdated programs.
With a 4.53/5 average, ~95% of reviews are positive. Students praise practical knowledge, real-world problem-solving, excellent teaching staff, and a curriculum preparing them for today's world. The international environment, diverse student body, and opportunities to understand different cultures are also frequently highlighted.
This university receives very positive feedback, with ~100% of reviews being 4-5 stars. Students highlight the nourishing of skills and a competitive yet positive environment. Accommodation costs are noted as high.
Nothing to show
With one review available, the university has a 4/5 average rating. The feedback highlights a friendly, international environment and supportive professors. No negative feedback was received.
Nothing to show
In general, I would say this school has a lack of communication with its employees. Both with student consultants and teachers so they have a lack of information in several important questions. In that case, if we have information and we know everything we need to then the bürocratic system of the school makes it harder to get what we desire within the foreseeable future. If we need to hand in any type of request we have to pay big enough amounts and this doesn't even ensure we get the answer we would like. There is no refund. Another important negative is that teachers' English knowledge is quite weak, the grammar and vocabulary as well, honourable expections. Project tasks are often not life-like, most students don't like these and try to get them from friends in higher grades. Lectures and seminars are mostly very boring because a bigger part of the teachers is just talking without asking students to give feedback. Of course, not all teachers are like this because there are angels as well who do their best. Most positives are given by hard-working, clever and experienced students who try to give as much help and information as possible. I would say they are the heart of this school and they are the people who organize nice events and make the student life good. The English program is very international there are Asian, African and middle-eastern students as well. I would not recommend this university at all. If this time I spent and will spend here will help me build my career it will be only because of the friends I make here however it is easier to find a job with a degree. So all together the school should improve its communication and should provide more language training for its teachers.
When I was admitted to BME, I had high expectations. Coming from a successful high school background with strong foundations in algebra, informatics, and physics, I was confident and motivated to thrive in a top European engineering university. Unfortunately, my experience at BME has not lived up to my expectations—especially as an international student. 1. Administrative and Structural Discrimination One of the biggest disappointments has been the clear separation between Hungarian, Erasmus, and international students. Almost every event is divided by nationality, creating silos instead of an inclusive academic community. Even basic facilities like dormitories are unequally allocated—Hungarian students are placed near the campus, while many international students, including myself, are forced to live in dormitories located in entirely different cities. This makes commuting to university both time-consuming and costly. Administrative support is also extremely lacking for non-Hungarians. The bureaucracy is slow, confusing, and often indifferent toward international students’ concerns. It often feels like we are not valued or even acknowledged unless we are fluent in Hungarian. 2. Unequal Treatment and Favoritism Although BME promotes itself as an international institution, there is clear favoritism in student selection and treatment—particularly towards Arabic students. While the university’s rector is of Arabic origin, it seems that this has led to an overwhelming admission of students from the same background (up to 80% in some departments), and unfortunately, favoritism in how rules are applied. There are PhD students, also from similar backgrounds, who act as teaching assistants and display bias based on religion or ethnicity. I personally faced hostility after expressing differing views in a discussion, and it escalated to verbal and physical aggression from fellow students. Even worse, some instructors allow academic dishonesty to take place openly, turning a blind eye when favored students cheat during exams. 3. Quality of Teaching Academically, the quality of instruction has also been underwhelming. Many professors are very senior, but unfortunately, many are disconnected from modern technological developments. They are often unapproachable, angry, and do not welcome questions. Some professors struggle with basic English, which makes lectures difficult to follow, especially in technical subjects. This severely affects the learning experience for international students. --- Final Thoughts If you're considering studying at BME as an international student, especially if you're seeking a collaborative, forward-thinking academic environment and fair treatment, I urge you to do thorough research and consider your options carefully. My personal experience has been marked by exclusion, inequality, and a lack of academic and personal support. Higher education should be a space for growth, innovation, and inclusion,but sadly, that has not been my experience at BME.
- Great University. - Great support system from teachers. - You will meet different nationalities. - Recommendable to anyone. I am a Master student in International Management. This course will help you later for working in Multinationals company and also management level.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
