Vilnius University vs Vytautas Magnus University - VDU vs Kaunas University of Technology - KTU vs Aleksandras Stulginskis University - ASU vs Kaunas University of Applied Sciences
Side-by-side comparison from 432 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Quality education and supportive professors
- +Welcoming, peaceful, and student-friendly environment
- +Real-world application and diverse student community
- +Flexible studies and course choice
- +Supportive and professional lecturers
- +International environment and community
- +Practical, career-focused programmes and supportive, knowledgeable lecturers.
- +Friendly, multicultural environment with international student opportunities.
- +Modern facilities and flexible schedules for work-study balance.
Nothing to show
- +Knowledgeable, approachable, and helpful lecturers
- +Relevant course content for practical skills
- +Positive campus environment and student activities
- +Supportive and knowledgeable lecturers
- +Modern study environment and facilities
- +Balance of theory and practical, real-world application
- +Engaging, practical learning with real-world application
- +Supportive and approachable professors
- +Well-structured curriculum and positive environment
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of necessary resources are a major drawback.
- -Poor communication and lack of transparency are recurring problems.
- -Poor communication and unclear policies.
- -Inadequate resources and outdated facilities.
- -Lack of student support and engagement.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are common complaints.
Nothing to show
- -Lack of engaging and relevant course content.
- -Poor communication and feedback from instructors.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
- -Outdated facilities and limited resources are a significant drawback.
- -The university suffers from administrative inefficiencies and poor management.
- -A lack of course variety and limited English-taught programs are disappointing.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
- -Lack of support and unclear communication from staff is a common complaint.
This institution receives commendable ratings across most surveyed aspects, particularly excelling in **Value** (4.62) and **Location** (4.59). Professors are also highly regarded (4.59). Student life and internationality are strong, with scores above 4.4. However, **Accomodation** stands out as a weaker area, receiving the lowest rating (3.72), suggesting potential for improvement in this category.
This university demonstrates a robust performance across most surveyed aspects. **Internationality** and **Facilities** stand out as its strongest areas, both scoring very highly. **Professors**, **Location**, and **Value** also receive commendations. The primary area for potential improvement appears to be **Accomodation**, which, while still positive, is rated lower than other categories. **Student Life** is also a strong point, though slightly below the top performers.
Rankings reveal a generally positive university experience, with the strongest area being its **Location**, scoring a remarkable 4.48. **Accomodation** received the lowest rating at 4.10, indicating room for improvement in this aspect. Other categories like Facilities, Professors, Student Life, Internationality, and Value all fall within a close and respectable range, generally above 4.2.
Nothing to show
With impressive scores in key areas, this university excels in **Professors** and **Location**, both rated at 4.67. **Student Life** also garners a strong 4.33. Areas for improvement include **Accomodation**, receiving the lowest rating at 2.67, and **Facilities**, at 3.67. **Internationality** scores 3.67, while **Value** is rated a solid 4.
Overall, the university garners positive feedback, with location and student life receiving particularly high marks. Facilities and internationality are also rated strongly. Areas for improvement are accommodation, which is the weakest aspect, and value, which is moderately rated. Professors and facilities also show solid scores, contributing to a generally favorable university experience.
This institution demonstrates particular strengths in its **professors** and **student life**, both receiving very high marks. **Facilities** and **value** also score exceptionally well. Conversely, **location**, **accommodation**, and **internationality** are areas that received comparatively lower ratings, suggesting potential for improvement in these specific aspects.
With an average rating of 4.62/5 from 143 reviews, ~99% are positive. Students praise quality education, supportive staff, welcoming international environment, and real-world projects. Minimal negative feedback highlights a few administrative delays.
~97% of students provided positive feedback, highlighting a flexible study system, international environment, and supportive lecturers. No negative reviews were recorded.
With 196 reviews, ~93% are positive, averaging 4.51/5 stars. Students highlight friendly, multicultural environments, approachable lecturers, and practical programs focused on real-world skills and professional growth.
Nothing to show
The four reviews are all positive (100%), with an average rating of 4.75/5. Students highly recommend the university, praising knowledgeable lecturers, relevant course content, and a positive campus environment. Some mention administrative support could be quicker.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting approachable lecturers, practical skills focus, and modern facilities. A single negative review (~3.7%) mentioned the institution being small.
With a 4.8/5 average rating, reviews are ~100% positive. Students praise the mind-blowing environment, friendly professors, and practical curriculum. Some noted occasional teaching weaknesses in English for international students.
For me, Vilnius University is well known & best University in whole Europe. Many international students are studying here.They are really making friendly rules for EU students though which is not applicable for Non EU students.There are lot of students from Asia & Africa continent's.As we know meximum things are different in these continent's, so they are facing huge problems after coming here for every case. In abroad, I think University's are like a family for us, so they should make some rules for us, which can release our academic & mental pressure, such as academic leave for a semester or a year.Now we can take the academic leave though I don’t think It’s the perfect way for non Eu students. So I am requesting that Universities should consider these matters for Non Eu students. Without these I love my University.
Nothing to show
Studying at Kaunas University of Technology has been a really good experience for me so far. I am studying Industrial Engineering Management, and I like how the program combines engineering knowledge with management and business skills. The subjects are practical and useful, especially for understanding how industries and companies work in real life. The teachers are friendly and supportive, and most of them are always ready to help students when needed. I also enjoy the international environment at KTU because I get to meet people from different countries and learn about different cultures. It makes university life more interesting and enjoyable. Another thing I appreciate is that the university focuses not only on theory but also on practical learning, teamwork, and projects. This helps students prepare for future jobs and gain confidence in their skills. Overall, I feel happy to study at Kaunas University of Technology. It is a good university for students who want quality education, personal growth, and better career opportunities in the future.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I am currently studying in the Tourism and Recreation programme and have completed four semesters. Overall, my experience at SMK College of Applied Sciences has been positive. The programme combines theoretical knowledge with practical activities, helping students understand how the tourism and recreation industry works in real-life situations. The lecturers are generally supportive and willing to help students when needed. Classes cover a variety of topics related to tourism, hospitality, recreation, and business, which provides a broad understanding of the field. I also appreciate the opportunity to work on projects and assignments that encourage teamwork and problem-solving skills. The college has an international environment, allowing students to meet people from different countries and cultures. This makes studying more interesting and helps improve communication skills. One area that could be improved is the organization of some administrative processes, which can occasionally take longer than expected. However, this has not significantly affected my studies. I would recommend SMK College of Applied Sciences to students who are interested in tourism and recreation and are looking for a practical, career-oriented study programme.
Nothing to show
