Vilnius University vs Vytautas Magnus University - VDU vs Kaunas University of Technology - KTU vs Lithuanian University of Health Science - LSMU vs Aleksandras Stulginskis University - ASU
Side-by-side comparison from 456 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Excellent learning system and accessible study materials
- +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty and coordinators
- +Strong academic programs with practical training opportunities
- +Flexible study system and course choice
- +Supportive lecturers and international environment
- +Efficient problem-solving and administrative support
- +Supportive faculty and helpful, approachable lecturers
- +Practical learning, real-world application, and career development opportunities
- +Welcoming, diverse, and multicultural international environment
- +High-quality education with experienced professors
- +Modern facilities and practical learning opportunities
- +Strong academic programs and extracurricular activities
Nothing to show
- +Knowledgeable, approachable, and helpful lecturers
- +Relevant course content for practical skills
- +Positive campus environment and student activities
- +Practical, real-world focused learning
- +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
- +Opportunities for personal and professional growth
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources detract from the learning experience.
- -Lack of support and guidance from faculty is a recurring concern.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant concern.
- -Outdated facilities and resources negatively impact the learning experience.
- -Lack of clear communication and student support is frequently cited.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are common complaints.
- -Teaching quality and course content are frequently criticized.
- -Administrative insensitivity and focus on fees over student well-being.
- -Rude and unhelpful staff, with an over-enrollment strategy.
- -Inconsistent course delivery and language barriers.
Nothing to show
- -Lack of engaging and relevant course content.
- -Poor communication and feedback from instructors.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
- -Limited course offerings, particularly in English, are disappointing.
This institution receives exceptional ratings in several key areas, particularly excelling in **Value** (4.60) and **Professors** (4.58). Student life, location, and internationality also score highly. However, **Accommodation** stands out as the weakest area, receiving a significantly lower rating. Overall, the university demonstrates a strong academic and social environment, with room for improvement in its housing provisions.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its **Internationality** (4.5) and **Professors** (4.4375), with high marks also for **Location** (4.4375) and **Value** (4.375). While **Facilities** (4.4348) and **Student Life** (4.3404) are also well-regarded, **Accomodation** (4.0417) emerges as the relatively weakest area in this assessment.
This institution demonstrates excellent performance across multiple aspects, with its **location** receiving the highest rating. **Facilities** and **professors** also score highly, indicating strengths in core academic and infrastructural areas. While **accommodation** stands out as the lowest-rated category, student life, internationality, and value are all rated favorably, contributing to a generally positive university experience.
This institution shines brightest in **Value**, boasting a rating of 4.275, closely followed by **Location** (4.192) and **Professors** (4.175). Conversely, **Internationality** received the lowest score at 3.617, with **Accomodation** and **Student Life** also ranking lower compared to other aspects. Facilities are rated a solid 4.008.
Nothing to show
With impressive scores in key areas, this university excels in **Professors** and **Location**, both rated at 4.67. **Student Life** also garners a strong 4.33. Areas for improvement include **Accomodation**, receiving the lowest rating at 2.67, and **Facilities**, at 3.67. **Internationality** scores 3.67, while **Value** is rated a solid 4.
This university generally receives positive feedback, with **Location** standing out as its strongest area. **Facilities**, **Student Life**, and **Internationality** also score highly. **Value** and **Professors** are rated well, though not quite as exceptionally. The primary area for improvement, however, is **Accomodation**, which received a notably lower score compared to other aspects.
The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~93% of students rating it 4–5 stars. Praised aspects include learning systems, humble and helpful teachers, and an international environment. Minimal negative feedback exists.
With ~85% positive feedback and an average rating of 4.41/5, students highlight a flexible education system, international environment, and supportive lecturers. There is virtually no negative feedback.
With 189 positive reviews and an average rating of 4.51/5, students highlight supportive faculty, practical learning, international opportunities, and professional development. Negative feedback is minimal, representing approximately 0% of all reviews.
~71% of reviews are positive, highlighting good study quality, experienced professors, and smooth communication. ~14% of feedback is negative, citing poor student treatment and administrative issues. The average rating is 3.93/5.
Nothing to show
The four reviews are all positive (100%), with an average rating of 4.75/5. Students highly recommend the university, praising knowledgeable lecturers, relevant course content, and a positive campus environment. Some mention administrative support could be quicker.
Approximately 80% of reviews are highly positive, praising personal growth, practical skills, and supportive lecturers. A small amount of negative feedback exists, noting the institution's size.
For me, Vilnius University is well known & best University in whole Europe. Many international students are studying here.They are really making friendly rules for EU students though which is not applicable for Non EU students.There are lot of students from Asia & Africa continent's.As we know meximum things are different in these continent's, so they are facing huge problems after coming here for every case. In abroad, I think University's are like a family for us, so they should make some rules for us, which can release our academic & mental pressure, such as academic leave for a semester or a year.Now we can take the academic leave though I don’t think It’s the perfect way for non Eu students. So I am requesting that Universities should consider these matters for Non Eu students. Without these I love my University.
Nothing to show
Studying at Kaunas University of Technology has been a really good experience for me so far. I am studying Industrial Engineering Management, and I like how the program combines engineering knowledge with management and business skills. The subjects are practical and useful, especially for understanding how industries and companies work in real life. The teachers are friendly and supportive, and most of them are always ready to help students when needed. I also enjoy the international environment at KTU because I get to meet people from different countries and learn about different cultures. It makes university life more interesting and enjoyable. Another thing I appreciate is that the university focuses not only on theory but also on practical learning, teamwork, and projects. This helps students prepare for future jobs and gain confidence in their skills. Overall, I feel happy to study at Kaunas University of Technology. It is a good university for students who want quality education, personal growth, and better career opportunities in the future.
Overall food science is an emerging field. University studies integrated with both practical approach for students learning and development. Moreover, corporation eith Erasmus programme and traineeship enchanced the learning thtough EU communiyy and International market.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I am currently studying in the Tourism and Recreation programme and have completed four semesters. Overall, my experience at SMK College of Applied Sciences has been positive. The programme combines theoretical knowledge with practical activities, helping students understand how the tourism and recreation industry works in real-life situations. The lecturers are generally supportive and willing to help students when needed. Classes cover a variety of topics related to tourism, hospitality, recreation, and business, which provides a broad understanding of the field. I also appreciate the opportunity to work on projects and assignments that encourage teamwork and problem-solving skills. The college has an international environment, allowing students to meet people from different countries and cultures. This makes studying more interesting and helps improve communication skills. One area that could be improved is the organization of some administrative processes, which can occasionally take longer than expected. However, this has not significantly affected my studies. I would recommend SMK College of Applied Sciences to students who are interested in tourism and recreation and are looking for a practical, career-oriented study programme.
