ESSEC Business School vs University of Thessaly vs Saarland University vs Business and Economics School - ISG vs University Sultan Moulay Slimane - USMS
Side-by-side comparison from 102 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High-quality, knowledgeable professors
- +Strong academic rigor and valuable skill development
- +Welcoming environment with good campus facilities and opportunities
- +Accessible and knowledgeable professors.
- +Relevant and focused academic programs.
- +Good campus location and facilities.
- +Challenging, conceptual learning and personal growth
- +Excellent, approachable professors and diverse disciplines
- +Great facilities, peaceful location, and affordable amenities
Nothing to show
- +Competent, knowledgeable, and supportive faculty
- +Well-structured courses and strong academic foundation
- +Value in the job market and diverse specializations
- +Knowledgeable and supportive professors
- +Excellent academic programs and resources
- +Conducive campus environment and facilities
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are frustrating.
- -Outdated facilities and poor accommodation are common complaints.
- -Location is inconvenient and perceived as unsafe at night.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequent complaints.
- -Ineffective administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Lack of resources and insufficient support hinder academic progress.
- -Useless coursework and lack of workforce preparation.
- -Programs appear to prioritize financial gain over student development.
- -Outdated facilities hinder learning and research.
Nothing to show
- -Difficulty with transportation and campus accessibility.
- -Poor quality of campus facilities and resources.
- -Ineffective teaching methods and curriculum relevance.
- -Unhelpful student services and lack of social life.
Nothing to show
This university receives commendable feedback, with Internationality standing out as its strongest aspect, achieving a high rating. Student Life and Value also perform very well, indicating a positive experience and good return on investment for students. Conversely, Location and Accommodation are areas where the university is rated less favorably, suggesting potential for improvement in these particular domains.
This institution excels in several key areas. Student life and value are particularly strong, receiving the highest marks among all surveyed categories. Location is also a significant positive. Conversely, accommodation emerges as the weakest area, with the lowest rating. Facilities and internationality also scored moderately, suggesting room for improvement.
Internationality stands out as the university's strongest asset, earning a high rating of 4.25. Conversely, accommodation received the lowest score at 3. Facilities also score well at 4. Professors and student life are rated moderately, at 3.75 and 3.5 respectively. Location and value are also in the middle range.
Nothing to show
Across surveyed categories, this institution shows notable strengths in its **Professors** (3.64) and **Value** (3.45). Conversely, its **Location** and **Accomodation** (both 2.73), along with **Internationality** (2.73), received the lowest marks. **Facilities** (3.0) and **Student Life** (2.9) fall in the middle range of these assessments.
The university scores well across multiple aspects, with Internationality and Professors receiving particularly strong ratings. While Facilities are the lowest-scoring area, they still represent a respectable average. Location, Student Life, Accommodation, and Value also demonstrate positive performance, indicating a well-rounded educational experience for students.
Nothing to show
With a 4.45 average rating from 49 reviews, ~94% of feedback is positive, praising knowledgeable professors, excellent financial support, and enriching academic environments. A small portion (~2%) noted location and accommodation concerns.
All 13 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.38/5. Students praise professors' approachability and expertise, alongside good facilities. Some mention a lack of campus activities or student life.
Three out of four reviews are positive (~74%), highlighting professors, diverse disciplines, and good facilities. One negative review (~25%) criticizes coursework and workforce preparation. The average rating is 3.5/5.
Nothing to show
With a 4.09 average rating from 11 reviews, ~74% of feedback is positive. Students highlight competent teachers, well-structured courses, and valuable degrees. Limited negative feedback mentions remote location and transportation issues.
With an average rating of 4.28/5, approximately 96% of reviews are positive. Students praise knowledgeable professors, excellent resources, and conducive learning environments. A small percentage of feedback noted unhelpful student services and limited social life.
Nothing to show
Essec BBA is a well known program if you want to attend a business school. The teaching is qualitative as the teachers usually are reputed experts in their fields. As far as it concerns the campus, you cannot complain about the diversity and quality of high tech equipment or the comfortable auditoriums. Pretty much everything is made for you to feel at ease and evolve as an ESSEC student. One of the rare things I could point out is the school campus location which is pretty much isolated and a bit far from the centre of Paris, otherwise, you can take public transport, easy to use and practical for your everyday student life.
Nothing to show
This university is a complete joke. The administrative staff are very wonderful, but the amount of useless coursework is appalling. You will not be prepared in any way for the workforce and you will not even be given enough foundational knowledge to pursue a research oriented track that meaningfully advances a scientific field. The programs are solely intended to lure in outside money from foreign students into the impoverished and economically depressed region. This could be forgiven if the programs then provided the basis for sustained economic growth and innovation, which would result in long term economic benefits for all parties. But they do not, instead just wasting years of life and tens of thousands of euros for students.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
