ESSEC Business School vs Universidad Católica de Córdoba - UCC vs University of Stuttgart vs European University of the Atlantic - UNEAT vs Lusíada University
Side-by-side comparison from 74 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High-quality, knowledgeable professors
- +Strong academic rigor and valuable skill development
- +Welcoming environment with good campus facilities and opportunities
- +Highly qualified and inspiring professors
- +Welcoming and supportive environment with good infrastructure
- +Valuable networking opportunities and a strong educational foundation
- +High quality of education and contemporary curriculum.
- +Commitment of professors and strong academic programs.
- +Diverse student body and international environment.
- +Modern facilities and comfortable location
- +Diverse international community
- +High-quality teaching staff
- +Supportive and knowledgeable professors
- +Practical application and well-structured courses
- +Good campus facilities
- +Comprehensive economics curriculum with diverse perspectives
- +Pleasant campus environment and well-stocked library
- +Accessible location with good transportation options
- +Strong academic training with knowledgeable professors
- +Well-structured and intellectually challenging Master's courses
- +Academic quality valued over campus life
- -Administrative and management issues are frustrating.
- -Outdated facilities and poor accommodation are common complaints.
- -Location is inconvenient and perceived as unsafe at night.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
- -The curriculum lacks relevance and practical application.
- -Outdated system and ineffective career support.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of essential resources are a constant problem.
- -Poor teaching quality and a disconnect with curriculum expectations are common complaints.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant problem.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently mentioned.
- -Communication gaps and lack of transparency are recurring concerns.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -The curriculum lacks relevance and practical application.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
- -Poor communication and administrative inefficiency.
- -Lack of career support and relevant learning experiences.
This university receives commendable feedback, with Internationality standing out as its strongest aspect, achieving a high rating. Student Life and Value also perform very well, indicating a positive experience and good return on investment for students. Conversely, Location and Accommodation are areas where the university is rated less favorably, suggesting potential for improvement in these particular domains.
Overall, the university receives strong marks, particularly in its faculty expertise, where it achieved an impressive 4.875. Student life, facilities, and accommodation were also highly rated, all scoring 4.28. Internationality and value received solid scores of 3.875 and 4.125 respectively. The location was the lowest-rated aspect, coming in at 3.57.
This institution garners impressive scores in several key areas, with Internationality (4.225) and Location (4.1625) being particularly well-regarded. Student Life also receives a solid rating (4.125). Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, scoring 3.4625, while Facilities (3.9375) and Professors (3.9625) are rated competently. Value for money is also strong at 3.975.
Exceptional scores define this university's offerings, with perfect marks awarded for its facilities, professors, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value. The only area falling slightly below this perfect standard is its location, which still garners a strong rating of 4. This indicates a consistently outstanding experience with particularly notable strengths in academic and campus life quality.
This university garners exceptional marks for its **Accomodation**, achieving a perfect score. Facilities, Professors, Internationality, and Value are also highly rated, all receiving 4.33. Location scores a solid 4. Student Life is the sole area receiving a rating below 4, at 3.67, representing its weakest point.
This institution garners impressive scores across several key areas. Professors, location, student life, accommodation, and value all received perfect marks, indicating exceptional strengths in these domains. Facilities and internationality were also highly rated, though slightly less so than the top-scoring categories. Overall, the university demonstrates a strong offering in its student experience and perceived worth.
Considered on several metrics, this institution demonstrates particular strengths in its **professors** and **internationality**, both receiving a high rating of 4. Conversely, **facilities** and **accommodation** emerge as areas needing significant improvement, each scoring a low 2. The university also received moderate scores for its location and student life.
With a 4.45 average rating from 49 reviews, ~94% of feedback is positive, praising knowledgeable professors, excellent financial support, and enriching academic environments. A small portion (~2%) noted location and accommodation concerns.
With a 4.67/5 average rating, ~89% of reviews are positive. Students frequently highlight highly qualified, inspiring professors and a welcoming campus environment with excellent resources. No negative feedback was reported.
With an average rating of 3.9/5 from 10 reviews, ~80% are positive, highlighting quality education and strong PhD programs, with many international students. ~10% of feedback is negative, citing bureaucracy and job prospects.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating, the single review highlights a pleasant atmosphere, excellent facilities, and a strong sense of community. The location and teaching staff were also positively noted.
All available reviews are positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students highlight dedicated lecturers, well-structured courses, and good facilities as key strengths. There is no negative feedback present.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback. Students praise the academic program's broad scope, accessible transportation, and pleasant campus environment. There is no negative feedback to report.
With one review, this university is rated 4/5 stars. Positive feedback (~100%) highlights solid academic training and knowledgeable professors. Areas for improvement were campus facilities and administrative services.
Essec BBA is a well known program if you want to attend a business school. The teaching is qualitative as the teachers usually are reputed experts in their fields. As far as it concerns the campus, you cannot complain about the diversity and quality of high tech equipment or the comfortable auditoriums. Pretty much everything is made for you to feel at ease and evolve as an ESSEC student. One of the rare things I could point out is the school campus location which is pretty much isolated and a bit far from the centre of Paris, otherwise, you can take public transport, easy to use and practical for your everyday student life.
Nothing to show
I study architecture and this study is structured in a different way in most universities. What I like about the University of Stuttgart is that after obtaining the broad and diverse basics of the study in the first 2 years, you have the freedom to choose your own seminars and projects, concentrating on your point of interest. You can also distribute them as you wish. This is a huge adventure in a field where praxis in an office next to the studies is so important. An international semester is foreseen as well which helps you develop enormously in personal and cultural way.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
