Akhbar El Youm Academy vs Yaba College of Technology - YabaTech vs Swiss School of Management - SSM vs Gujarat Technological University vs University of Canterbury

Side-by-side comparison from 69 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Swiss School of Management - SSM (5.00)
Akhbar El Youm Academy: wins 0/6 categories
Yaba College of Technology - YabaTech: wins 0/6 categories
Swiss School of Management - SSM: wins 6/6 categories
Gujarat Technological University: wins 0/6 categories
University of Canterbury: wins 0/6 categories
Ahram Canadian University: wins 0/6 categories
Talisay City College - TCC: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Microbiology
Bellinzona, Switzerland
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of Business Administration
Best programme: Chemical Engineering
Christchurch, New Zealand
3.90
Read more reviews
12 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting
Best programme: HR Management and Leadership
Cebu City, Philippines
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
3.21
4.67
Win
4.06
4.08
2.00
Not rated
Location
Not rated
4.24
5.00
Win
4.18
4.45
1.50
Not rated
Professors
Not rated
4.14
4.33
Win
4.11
4.25
2.33
Not rated
Internationality
Not rated
3.68
5.00
Win
3.21
4.17
2.00
Not rated
Student life
Not rated
3.88
4.33
4.18
4.33
1.83
Not rated
Value
Not rated
4.18
5.00
Win
3.58
4.17
2.33
Not rated
Accommodation
Not rated
3.21
5.00
Win
3.47
3.70
1.83
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros

Nothing to show

  • +High academic standard with theory and practicals
  • +Conducive learning environment and campus life
  • +Supportive and committed lecturers
  • +Practical, real-world preparation
  • +Personal and professional growth
  • +International experience
  • +Innovative curriculum and practical approach
  • +Supportive and guiding professors
  • +Good facilities and flexible language options
  • +Excellent academic programs and teaching quality
  • +Strong sense of community and supportive environment
  • +Modern facilities and comprehensive student services
  • +Practical skills and real-world application focus
  • +Supportive professors and creative encouragement
  • +Modern facilities and friendly atmosphere

Nothing to show

Cons

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Course content is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly structured.
  • -Frustrating administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Lack of engaging and relevant curriculum.
  • -Administrative and curriculum issues, including impractical assignments and rigid course selection.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor infrastructure.
  • -Lack of focus on practical knowledge and skills.
  • -Administrative and management issues are frequent frustrations.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of student support and staff insensitivity create a negative environment.
  • -Lack of transparency and fairness in grading.
  • -Outdated curriculum and lack of modern industry relevance.
  • -Limited practical skill development for future careers.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **location** (4.24) and the **value** it offers (4.18), alongside excellent ratings for its **professors** (4.14). Conversely, **facilities** and **accommodation** received the lowest scores, both at 3.21. Student life and internationality are rated moderately well, with scores of 3.88 and 3.68 respectively, indicating room for improvement in the physical campus experience.

This institution boasts exceptional scores in several key areas, notably achieving perfect marks for **Location**, **Accomodation**, **Internationality**, and **Value**. The **Facilities** also stand out with a strong rating of 4.67. Areas showing slightly less consistent strength, though still positive, include **Professors** and **Student Life**, both rated at 4.33.

This university garners its highest marks in **Location** and **Student Life**, both receiving a 4.18 rating. **Professors** also scored well at 4.11. Conversely, **Internationality** presents the lowest score at 3.21, closely followed by **Accomodation** at 3.47. **Value** sits at a moderate 3.58, while **Facilities** earned a respectable 4.06.

Student feedback indicates exceptional strengths in **Student Life** (4.33) and **Professors** (4.25). **Internationality** and **Value** also received high marks. The university's **Location** and **Accomodation** were rated as its weakest areas, though still moderate. Overall, the university demonstrates a solid performance with particular acclaim for its student experience and faculty.

This institution's assessment reveals a varied landscape of strengths and weaknesses. Its strongest areas, both scoring a solid 2, are Facilities and Internationality. Conversely, Location stands out as the weakest point, with a rating of 1.5. Professors and Value show moderate performance, while Student Life and Accommodation fall slightly below average.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Nothing to show

University reviews show strong satisfaction, with ~93% positive feedback. Students praise the high academic standards, committed lecturers, and engaging campus life. A small number mention academic pressure and compressed courses.

All three reviews are overwhelmingly positive, awarding a perfect 5/5 rating. Students highlight the university's encouragement of creativity and practical, real-world business preparation. The international experience and the balance between theory and practice are also frequently praised.

With a 4/5 average rating from 19 reviews, ~74% are positive, praising academic programs, practical approaches, and facilities. A small ~5.3% expressed dissatisfaction with curriculum and assessment.

Around 58% of reviews highlight a great academic environment, friendly staff, and supportive community. The remaining ~8.3% express dissatisfaction with staff interactions, particularly for students with disabilities.

With an average rating of 2.17/5, ~67% of reviews are negative. Students express frustration with outdated curriculum, lack of AI and modern tool instruction, and unfair grading. A few positive reviews highlight strong academic foundations and supportive professors.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
0%
34%
100%
42%
42%
17%
0%
4★
0%
55%
0%
26%
17%
17%
0%
3★
0%
10%
0%
26%
33%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
8%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
5%
0%
67%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

The school environment

Yaba College of Technology is a student - friendly environment to be, ranging from the lectures to the extra-curricular activities. I studied Architecture, HND and I can say, I learnt alot from the magnificent lecturers from theories to practicals. Also, other gained knowledge from service courses were apt. More so, the well planned zoning of the school makes it easier to move from a place to another.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close