Saint Petersburg State University - SPSU vs National Research University Higher School of Economics - HSE vs Moscow International Higher Business School - MIRBIS vs Eurasian Management and Administration School vs Center for Creative Leadership
Side-by-side comparison from 83 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical skills and real-world experience
- +Supportive environment and positive social life
- +Quality teaching and engaging subjects
- +High academic quality & skilled faculty
- +Global outlook & diverse programs
- +Career opportunities & strong network
Nothing to show
- +Practical, results-driven business education
- +Actionable assignments and real-world application
- +Experienced professors and industry insights
- +Student-centered support and inclusivity
- +Welcoming and understanding community
Nothing to show
- +Specialized forestry, engineering, and industrial technology programs
- +Strong expertise in forestry engineering, transport systems, and industrial technologies
- +Bachelor's programs in technical and applied fields
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of support and clear communication from staff is prevalent.
- -Administrative and management issues hinder student support.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and subjective academic processes are problematic.
- -Unrealistic exam difficulty and demanding workloads cause frustration.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are prevalent.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Facilities are often described as outdated or poorly maintained.
- -Course content is perceived as irrelevant or not up-to-date.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are common complaints.
- -Lack of resources and support hinders learning and engagement.
Examining the university's performance reveals exceptional strengths, particularly in **Student Life** (4.75) and **Internationality** (4.5). Facilities and value also received positive scores. Conversely, **Location** (3.95) and **Accomodation** (3.925) represent areas with room for improvement, though professors garnered a respectable 4.1 rating.
This institution demonstrates a particularly strong showing in its **Location**, receiving the highest rating. Value and Professors are also highly regarded. Conversely, the **Accomodation** received the lowest score among the evaluated aspects. The university also scores well in Internationality, Facilities, and Student Life, indicating a generally positive overall perception with a few areas for potential improvement.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates exceptional strength in **Value** and **Internationality**, both scoring very high. **Professors** also receive a strong rating, indicating high academic quality. **Facilities**, **Student Life**, and **Accomodation** are all rated solidly, suggesting a good overall student experience. The lowest-rated area, though still positive, is **Location**.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths, with perfect scores awarded for Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, and Value. These areas represent the university's most outstanding attributes. The accommodation rating of 3 indicates a moderate but not exceptional aspect of the student experience. Internationality also scores well at 4, suggesting a generally welcoming environment for global students.
Nothing to show
The university demonstrates a solid overall performance, with its location receiving the highest rating at 4. Across the board, facilities, professors, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value are all rated a consistent 3.5, indicating a good, though not exceptional, experience in these areas. The standout feature is its advantageous location.
With an average rating of 4.25/5, ~88% of reviews are positive, highlighting theoretical and soft skill development, good faculty, and enjoyable extracurriculars. There are no negative reviews.
Around 96% of reviews are positive, highlighting high-quality education, excellent faculty, and valuable connections. A small portion of feedback mentions issues with some professors and the grading system.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.82/5 from 49 reviews, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highly praise the school's practical, results-driven business education and real-world application. Modules and assignments are frequently highlighted for their immediate applicability.
With one review, the university is highly rated at 5/5. This positive feedback highlights excellent student care and a welcoming environment. No negative reviews were received.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4/5, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). One reviewer highlighted specialized programs in forestry and industrial technologies. No negative reviews were recorded.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
If you’re looking for a practical, results-driven business education that makes a real impact, the Eurasian Management & Administration School (EMAS) is an excellent choice. EMAS stands out as one of the strongest business schools in Central and Eastern Europe, offering MBA, Executive MBA, DBA, and business coaching programs that focus on real-world implementation and strategic thinking. DBA at EMAS transformed my leadership and boosted my Business vision, it’s a Strategic DBA, that gives real business impact. The DBA sharpened my executive edge. In all it’s a Practical DBA, great support, real impact.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show