SKEMA Business School vs New York University - NYU vs Arizona State University - ASU vs Hochschule Fresenius vs Berea College
Side-by-side comparison from 458 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical, hands-on application of skills in business contexts
- +Relevant, up-to-date curriculum with industry-experienced professors
- +International experience and career support
- +Dedicated professors and academic rigor
- +Supportive environment for integration and collaboration
- +Vibrant student life and modern facilities
- +Critical thinking and personal growth
- +Supportive instructors and diverse community
- +Practical experience and career preparation
- +Relevant and varied course content
- +Helpful and educated faculty
- +Supportive university staff
- +Supportive community and caring staff
- +Engaging professors and excellent teaching
- +Opportunities for growth and development
- +Strong academic programs and supportive instructors
- +Opportunities for international exposure and cultural immersion
- +Practical experience and career advancement support
- +Academic excellence and holistic development
- +Supportive and knowledgeable professors
- +Welcoming environment and quality facilities
- -Poor communication and guidance from administration and faculty.
- -Disorganized program management and overwhelming course loads.
- -Concerns about faculty behavior and the school's financial focus over student well-being.
- -Poor educational outcomes and value for money.
- -Insufficient support for online students and inflexible course structures.
- -Poor quality of instruction and unhelpful TAs.
- -Lack of organization and clear communication from administration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
- -Uninspiring teaching methods and irrelevant curriculum.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Course content and teaching quality are frequently criticized.
- -Limited extracurriculars and career opportunities for early students.
- -Poor campus environment and lack of engagement.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are a common complaint.
- -Students frequently cite poor communication and disorganization from staff.
- -A lack of responsiveness and support from faculty is a recurring issue.
The university demonstrates notable strengths in its teaching staff, receiving a high rating for professors. Internationality and location also received positive scores, indicating strong performance in these areas. However, accommodation presents a weaker point, with a significantly lower rating compared to other aspects. Overall, student life, facilities, and value for money are rated reasonably well.
Generally speaking, this university garners solid ratings across multiple facets. Professors and Facilities stand out as the strongest areas, both scoring above 4.3. Student Life and Accommodations represent areas for potential improvement, with ratings around 4.1. Location, Internationality, and Value also receive favorable marks, generally within the 4.2-4.3 range.
This university garners strong evaluations across several key areas. Professors receive the highest marks, indicating a significant strength in teaching quality. The weakest area is student life, though it still maintains a positive rating. Other aspects such as facilities, location, accommodation, internationality, and value are all rated comparably well, suggesting a generally positive student experience.
With a perfect score of 5, location stands out as the university's strongest asset. Student life, however, received the lowest rating at 3.33. Facilities and internationality scored a respectable 3.67, while professors and value were rated highly at 4. Accommodations were rated at 3.
Examining the university's performance reveals a mixed but generally positive picture. Professors received the highest commendation, indicating a strong academic faculty. On the other hand, location emerged as the weakest aspect, suggesting potential drawbacks for some students. Student life, accommodation, internationality, and value all scored well, reflecting a generally satisfactory experience across these key areas. Facilities also received a solid rating.
Considerable acclaim has been received across multiple university aspects. The institution excels particularly in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring an impressive 4.92. **Professors** also garnered high marks at 4.58. Conversely, the **Accomodation** received the lowest rating at 3.67, with **Facilities** also being a relative weakness at 3.83. **Student Life** and **Value** scored moderately well.
Remarkably strong scores define the university's profile. Facilities, professors, and student life all achieved an outstanding 4.75, while location and accommodation also garnered excellent ratings. The sole area for potential improvement lies in internationality, which registered at 3.5. Overall, the institution offers a compelling value proposition, indicated by a solid 4.
With a 4.34 average rating from 132 reviews, ~90% are positive, highlighting practical AI and marketing curricula, and international experiences. A small ~3% of negative feedback mentions poor management and communication.
With an average rating of 4.28/5 from 121 reviews, ~99% are positive. Students praise academic excellence, supportive professors, and a collaborative environment. Minimal negative feedback exists.
With ~99% positive sentiment, reviews highlight critical thinking, diverse programs, and supportive instructors. A small ~1% of feedback mentions issues with online course structure and TA helpfulness.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%) with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise course content, helpful lecturers, and good accommodation. A few minor criticisms mention strict grading in one course and occasional unhelpful teachers.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~100% of feedback being 4-5 stars and an average rating of 4.57. Students highlight a supportive and serene environment, excellent classes, and dedicated professors.
With an average rating of 4.5/5 based on 12 reviews, approximately 92% of feedback is positive, highlighting independent learning opportunities, practical professors, and a good study abroad experience. A small portion (~8%) of reviews express dissatisfaction with limited extracurriculars and job opportunities.
All four reviews are positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students praise academic excellence, faculty passion, and a welcoming, diverse environment. Facilities and resources are also highlighted positively.
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
Nothing to show
I like how comprehensive and well-rounded all of the knowledge I have so far learned during my studies has been. However, some instructors refuse to modernize their curricula and continue to teach in their antiquated ways.
Basically, it’s a private university with a good reputation and also the lecturers are well educated and helpful. The course contains 60% of management-related modules and the remaining technical modules. For anyone who is searching for a techno-management course, I would suggest Hochschule Fresenius.
Nothing to show
Schiller university is the best thing that can ever happen to anyone l will never regret the day l applied and l mostly love their campus in Germany it has nice aesthetics and obviously l love their culture
Nothing to show
