SKEMA Business School vs Cape Peninsula University of Technology - CPUT vs Rhodes University - RU vs North-West University - NWU vs Milpark Education
Side-by-side comparison from 669 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Industry relevance and practical skills
- +International exposure and diverse student body
- +Career opportunities and personal development
- +Supportive and experienced lecturers
- +Practical, hands-on learning
- +Welcoming faculty and smooth transitions
- +Supportive administration and lecturers
- +Engaged learning and academic development
- +Inclusive culture and vibrant campus life
- +Excellent education and supportive academic environment
- +Vibrant student life and organized campus experience
- +Beautiful campus aesthetics and comfortable facilities
- +Exceptional flexibility for working professionals.
- +Strong lecturer availability and support systems.
- +Well-structured and engaging course content.
- +Student-centered support and inclusivity
- +Welcoming and understanding community
- +Flexible online programs balancing work and study
- +Supportive lecturers and practical learning experiences
- +Efficient registration and accessible study resources
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and disorganization.
- -Perceived focus on profit over student welfare and discriminatory practices.
- -Ineffective career guidance and problematic teaching faculty.
- -Administrative and management issues cause delays and poor communication.
- -Lack of sufficient resources, equipment, and accommodation is a significant problem.
- -Inconsistent lecturer dedication and unclear career prospects after graduation are concerns.
- -Administrative and management issues negatively impact student experience.
- -Some lecturers are disengaged and prioritize their own research.
- -Outdated infrastructure and limited support services cause significant problems.
- -Administrative and management issues, including unclear selection processes and understaffed courses.
- -Lack of practical experience and industry-linked opportunities for students.
- -Language barriers, particularly the dominance of Afrikaans in lectures and campus life.
- -Administrative and communication issues create confusion and unnecessary costs.
- -The institution prioritizes financial gain over genuine student support and well-being.
- -Exam content and assessment procedures are misleading and unfair.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Facilities are often described as outdated or poorly maintained.
- -Course content is perceived as irrelevant or not up-to-date.
- -Excessive administrative burdens and lack of support.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities and equipment.
- -Limited access to essential resources and learning materials.
Academic and social aspects of the institution received particularly high marks, with Professors and Internationality scoring above 4.3. Facilities and Location also performed well, both exceeding 4.2. Student Life and Value were rated positively around 4.1. The weakest area identified was Accomodation, which received a score of 3.58.
This university demonstrates a commendable performance across key areas, with particularly strong showings in its professors and value for money, both scoring 4.09. Student life and location also received favorable ratings, around 3.8. However, the university's weakest area is accommodation, with a rating of 3.1, and internationality, at 3.45, also presents an opportunity for improvement. Facilities, rated at 3.62, fall in the mid-range.
Academic offerings and global engagement are clear strengths, with Professors and Internationality receiving high marks. Value also stands out as a significant positive. Conversely, Location is the lowest-rated aspect, suggesting this could be an area for improvement. Facilities and Student Life are generally well-regarded, as is Accomodation.
This institution garners impressive scores across most evaluated aspects. Value stands out as its strongest area, with a rating of 4.38. Professors and Student Life are also highly regarded, both receiving scores of 4.20. Conversely, Accomodation presents as the weakest area, scoring 3.84, indicating a potential point for improvement compared to other strengths.
This institution exhibits a notable disparity in its evaluated aspects. Its weakest areas, with scores of 1.25 and 1 respectively, are Facilities and Accomodation, suggesting significant room for improvement in these domains. Conversely, Location, Internationality, and Value are its strongest points, all receiving a solid rating of 3. Professors also perform moderately well at 3.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths, with perfect scores awarded for Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, and Value. These areas represent the university's most outstanding attributes. The accommodation rating of 3 indicates a moderate but not exceptional aspect of the student experience. Internationality also scores well at 4, suggesting a generally welcoming environment for global students.
This institution receives high marks in several key areas, notably excelling in **Value (4.64)** and **Location (4.3)**. **Student Life (4.2)** and **Facilities (4.11)** are also rated positively. However, **Accomodation (3.17)** stands out as the weakest area, indicating potential room for improvement in student living arrangements. Other categories like Professors and Internationality also received solid, above average scores.
~97.5% of 161 reviews are positive, highlighting practical, industry-oriented programs, excellent teaching, and international environments. A small ~2.5% of feedback mentions poor management and communication.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting supportive lecturers, practical learning, and rewarding study experiences. A small percentage of feedback (~9%) mentions challenges with accommodation and administrative issues.
Most students praise Rhodes University's quick administration, supportive lecturers, and vibrant culture. A small percentage noted concerns with specific departments, lecturer focus, or infrastructure like water cuts.
Approximately 99.3% of reviews are positive, highlighting excellent education, vibrant student life, and helpful support services. A tiny fraction of negative feedback points to a need for more practical experience and occasional language barriers.
Half of the university's reviews are negative, citing communication and application issues, as well as concerns about finances and perceived unfair grading. Positive feedback highlights flexibility and lecturer support, despite the high cost.
With one review, the university is highly rated at 5/5. This positive feedback highlights excellent student care and a welcoming environment. No negative reviews were received.
All 11 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.64/5. Students praised flexible online programs, responsiveness, and practical course content preparation for the workforce.
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
The e-learning center being open 24/7 really help me when wi-fi was inaccessible in my residents. This really help me to work in a quiet environment that's filled with like minded students. Highly recommend this institution!
Nothing to show
NWU helps unlock students potentials. I came here as a shy person, in less than 2 years I'm a completely different person . More confidence, I am more focused , more motivated and so much more .it's a worthwhile experience being here .
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
