SKEMA Business School vs Cape Peninsula University of Technology - CPUT vs University of the Western Cape - UWC vs North-West University - NWU vs Milpark Education
Side-by-side comparison from 720 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High-quality formation and practical business programs
- +Diverse international environment and collaborative experiences
- +Strong career support, professional opportunities, and skill development
- +Supportive and experienced lecturers
- +Practical, hands-on learning
- +Welcoming faculty and smooth transitions
- +Supportive and helpful staff/lecturers
- +Strong academic programs and career preparation
- +Diverse and inclusive campus environment
- +Excellent education and supportive academic environment
- +Vibrant student life and organized campus experience
- +Beautiful campus aesthetics and comfortable facilities
- +Exceptional flexibility for working professionals.
- +Strong lecturer availability and support systems.
- +Well-structured and engaging course content.
- +Supportive and dedicated lecturers.
- +Practical learning experiences and diverse showcases.
- +Smooth and hassle-free administrative processes.
- +Small class sizes and lecturer support
- +Practical, career-driven coursework with diverse subjects
- +Streamlined application process
- -Administrative and management issues lead to poor communication and disorganization.
- -Faculty are perceived as prioritizing profit over student well-being and academic support.
- -Concerns exist regarding racial discrimination and a lack of guidance for career aspirations.
- -Administrative and management issues cause delays and poor communication.
- -Lack of sufficient resources, equipment, and accommodation is a significant problem.
- -Inconsistent lecturer dedication and unclear career prospects after graduation are concerns.
- -Administrative and financial system issues cause student stress.
- -Lack of empathy and support from departments is discouraging.
- -Administrative and management issues, including unclear selection processes and understaffed courses.
- -Lack of practical experience and industry-linked opportunities for students.
- -Language barriers, particularly the dominance of Afrikaans in lectures and campus life.
- -Administrative and communication issues create confusion and unnecessary costs.
- -The institution prioritizes financial gain over genuine student support and well-being.
- -Exam content and assessment procedures are misleading and unfair.
- -Overpriced tuition and fees.
- -Inadequate resources and support.
- -Poorly maintained facilities.
- -Administrative and management issues, including a lack of recognition for prior learning.
- -Poor quality of subjects compared to previous learning experiences.
- -Financial and communication problems with the accounts department.
This institution receives commendable evaluations across several key areas. Its strongest performances are noted in **Internationality** (4.39) and **Professors** (4.39), closely followed by **Location** (4.24) and **Facilities** (4.22). **Student Life** (4.14) and **Value** (4.05) also score well. The area with the lowest rating is **Accomodation** (3.58).
This university demonstrates a commendable performance across key areas, with particularly strong showings in its professors and value for money, both scoring 4.09. Student life and location also received favorable ratings, around 3.8. However, the university's weakest area is accommodation, with a rating of 3.1, and internationality, at 3.45, also presents an opportunity for improvement. Facilities, rated at 3.62, fall in the mid-range.
Regarding university ratings, value emerges as the strongest aspect, closely followed by professors. Conversely, accommodation presents the weakest area, with location also receiving a less favorable score. Student life and internationality are rated solidly, while facilities fall in the mid-range.
This institution garners impressive scores across most evaluated aspects. Value stands out as its strongest area, with a rating of 4.38. Professors and Student Life are also highly regarded, both receiving scores of 4.20. Conversely, Accomodation presents as the weakest area, scoring 3.84, indicating a potential point for improvement compared to other strengths.
This institution exhibits a notable disparity in its evaluated aspects. Its weakest areas, with scores of 1.25 and 1 respectively, are Facilities and Accomodation, suggesting significant room for improvement in these domains. Conversely, Location, Internationality, and Value are its strongest points, all receiving a solid rating of 3. Professors also perform moderately well at 3.
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly in its **Value** and **Location**, both receiving excellent scores. The **Internationality** of the student body is also highly rated. Conversely, **Accomodation** is the weakest area, with a significantly lower score compared to other aspects. **Student Life** and **Facilities** also present opportunities for improvement, while **Professors** are well-regarded.
This university garners notable strengths in its facilities, scoring a high 4.2, and a good location rating of 4.14. Student life and overall value also received positive marks. Conversely, accommodation stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.29. Professors and internationality also scored moderately well.
With a 4.36 average rating from 157 reviews, ~87% highlight quality education, international experiences, and career opportunities. A small ~2.6% of feedback mentions poor communication and organization.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting supportive lecturers, practical learning, and rewarding study experiences. A small percentage of feedback (~9%) mentions challenges with accommodation and administrative issues.
With a 4.19 average rating from 67 reviews, ~79% of feedback is positive. Students praise strong academic programs and supportive faculty, particularly in EMS and Accounting. A small amount of negative feedback (~3%) highlights challenges with financial aid systems and student support.
Approximately 99.3% of reviews are positive, highlighting excellent education, vibrant student life, and helpful support services. A tiny fraction of negative feedback points to a need for more practical experience and occasional language barriers.
Half of the university's reviews are negative, citing communication and application issues, as well as concerns about finances and perceived unfair grading. Positive feedback highlights flexibility and lecturer support, despite the high cost.
With an average rating of 4.18/5, ~74% of reviews are positive, praising lecturer support, practical experience, and a smooth administrative process. There is no negative feedback.
About 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting small class sizes, supportive lecturers, and practical coursework. A small percentage of feedback, around 7%, mentions issues with recognition of prior learning and administrative processes.
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
The e-learning center being open 24/7 really help me when wi-fi was inaccessible in my residents. This really help me to work in a quiet environment that's filled with like minded students. Highly recommend this institution!
Nothing to show
NWU helps unlock students potentials. I came here as a shy person, in less than 2 years I'm a completely different person . More confidence, I am more focused , more motivated and so much more .it's a worthwhile experience being here .
Nothing to show
I attended Stadio with hesitance - I had really been hoping to attend a more mainstream university like WITS or UJ - but I got all that and more with Stadio. The lecturers are the best, nothing compares to their intellect and interest in their respective fields. There are, admittedly, certain issues with admin (it may be an uncommon issue) But, like I said - excellent lecturers, great quality content to learn, and simply an overall enjoyable experience to be able to attend Stadio.
The block system that is used at Eduvos, is one that divides the year's content into four quarters, as opposed to semesters - so, the exams are written four times. This makes it a little more strenuous because there is more content to cover in little time and there is hardly enough time to prepare for exams. Most students are already drained by the time they have to write exams because, during the seven weeks of classes they have to write tests and hand-in assignments, this gives them no time to reboot because exams begin on week 8 of every block. However, the workload can be easily tackled with a good study calendar since it is usually 3 modules per block in the first two years of study. So, with the right time-management, good grades can be achieved.
