SKEMA Business School vs University of South Africa - UNISA vs University of the Western Cape - UWC vs North-West University - NWU vs Milpark Education
Side-by-side comparison from 1,134 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical skills and real-world business application
- +International environment and diverse experiences
- +Career development and professional growth
- +Flexible distance learning and affordability
- +High academic standards and knowledgeable lecturers
- +Supportive environment and good student experience
- +Supportive and helpful staff/lecturers
- +Strong academic programs and career preparation
- +Diverse and inclusive campus environment
- +Excellent education and supportive academic environment
- +Vibrant student life and organized campus experience
- +Beautiful campus aesthetics and comfortable facilities
- +Exceptional flexibility for working professionals.
- +Strong lecturer availability and support systems.
- +Well-structured and engaging course content.
- +Welcoming atmosphere and timely graduation
- +Reliable student services
- +Calm and positive environment
- +Small class sizes and lecturer support
- +Practical, career-driven coursework with diverse subjects
- +Streamlined application process
- -Administrative & management issues
- -Poor communication and guidance
- -Outdated facilities and teaching faculty
- -Technical issues and website glitches hinder access to information.
- -Poor administrative support and confusing module selection processes create frustration.
- -Lack of direct, in-person interaction and guidance for new students is a significant drawback.
- -Administrative and financial system issues cause student stress.
- -Lack of empathy and support from departments is discouraging.
- -Administrative and management issues, including unclear selection processes and understaffed courses.
- -Lack of practical experience and industry-linked opportunities for students.
- -Language barriers, particularly the dominance of Afrikaans in lectures and campus life.
- -Administrative and communication issues create confusion and unnecessary costs.
- -The institution prioritizes financial gain over genuine student support and well-being.
- -Exam content and assessment procedures are misleading and unfair.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a common complaint.
- -The curriculum and teaching methods are often perceived as ineffective.
- -Administrative and management issues, including a lack of recognition for prior learning.
- -Poor quality of subjects compared to previous learning experiences.
- -Financial and communication problems with the accounts department.
Across surveyed categories, this institution demonstrates robust strengths in **Internationality (4.43)** and **Professors (4.37)**. Student life, location, and facilities also received positive scores. However, **Accomodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at **3.70**, suggesting potential room for improvement in that specific aspect. The overall value is also rated favorably at 4.09.
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths, with the highest marks awarded for **Value** (4.36), closely followed by **Location** (4.31) and **Internationality** (4.23). Professors and Facilities also received positive feedback, both scoring above 4.1. The weakest area identified is **Accomodation**, which received a significantly lower rating of 3.20, with Student Life also being a less strong point at 3.96.
Regarding university ratings, value emerges as the strongest aspect, closely followed by professors. Conversely, accommodation presents the weakest area, with location also receiving a less favorable score. Student life and internationality are rated solidly, while facilities fall in the mid-range.
This institution garners impressive scores across most evaluated aspects. Value stands out as its strongest area, with a rating of 4.38. Professors and Student Life are also highly regarded, both receiving scores of 4.20. Conversely, Accomodation presents as the weakest area, scoring 3.84, indicating a potential point for improvement compared to other strengths.
This institution exhibits a notable disparity in its evaluated aspects. Its weakest areas, with scores of 1.25 and 1 respectively, are Facilities and Accomodation, suggesting significant room for improvement in these domains. Conversely, Location, Internationality, and Value are its strongest points, all receiving a solid rating of 3. Professors also perform moderately well at 3.
An excellent student experience is evident, with top marks awarded for Facilities and Student Life, alongside high scores for Internationality. The university also performs well in terms of Professors and Accomodation. Its weakest area, according to these ratings, is Value, which received a moderate score. Location also garnered a good but not outstanding rating.
This university garners notable strengths in its facilities, scoring a high 4.2, and a good location rating of 4.14. Student life and overall value also received positive marks. Conversely, accommodation stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.29. Professors and internationality also scored moderately well.
With a 4.37/5 average rating from 175 reviews, approximately 97.7% of students provide positive feedback. Key highlights include practical skills, international opportunities, and professional development. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions poor management and organization.
With a 4.33 average rating from 456 reviews, ~86% are positive, praising academic standards, detailed materials, and distance learning flexibility. A small ~2.4% of feedback is negative, citing technical issues and navigation difficulties.
With a 4.19 average rating from 67 reviews, ~79% of feedback is positive. Students praise strong academic programs and supportive faculty, particularly in EMS and Accounting. A small amount of negative feedback (~3%) highlights challenges with financial aid systems and student support.
Approximately 99.3% of reviews are positive, highlighting excellent education, vibrant student life, and helpful support services. A tiny fraction of negative feedback points to a need for more practical experience and occasional language barriers.
Half of the university's reviews are negative, citing communication and application issues, as well as concerns about finances and perceived unfair grading. Positive feedback highlights flexibility and lecturer support, despite the high cost.
The single review indicates a positive experience, with a ~100% positive sentiment. Students highlight a calm and welcoming atmosphere, reliable services, and timely graduation.
About 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting small class sizes, supportive lecturers, and practical coursework. A small percentage of feedback, around 7%, mentions issues with recognition of prior learning and administrative processes.
Studying at Skema Business School in Sophia Antipolis was a fantastic experience. The campus is modern and located in a wonderful tech hub. The professors bring real-world business experience to the classroom. I loved the multicultural environment and the group projects. Skema gave me great friends, a strong global network, and the right skills for my career.
My experience with the university has been amazing and I thank every lecturer at that university that helped shaped my future. I met great people through out my journey and we're even friends. I would highly recommend the university to anyone.
Nothing to show
One thing I can say is the support services are very helpful. From class reps who stand on students behalf to communicate with lecturers to facilitators who do group sessions to prepare students for tests and exams and tutors who personally help students individually to clear uncertainties . Lecturers are welcome and willing to help students at all times. It's a great institution.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Whatever you do, do not enroll with this facility if you have already completed subject that is in another course that you want to enroll in. they do not give you the option to apply for recognition of prior learning, and the subject are of a lessor standard that what I have completed. they will waste your money, phone your next of kin regarding an account where they owe you money on. Their admin department is seriously in need of education and accounts department are already in possession of my account details to refund what I could manage to cancel without it costing me more that what they have taken due to them not answering emails either. I have also referred this to SAICA for review of their standards and ethics.
