SKEMA Business School vs Rochester Institute of Technology - RIT vs Schiller International University vs Florida Polytechnic University - FPU vs NUC University

Side-by-side comparison from 229 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
SKEMA Business School: wins 0/6 categories
Rochester Institute of Technology - RIT: wins 0/6 categories
Schiller International University: wins 2/6 categories
Florida Polytechnic University - FPU: wins 1/6 categories
NUC University: wins 1/6 categories
Corban University: wins 2/6 categories
TETR College of Business: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Supply Chain Management
Rochester, New York, United States
4.20
Read more reviews
39 reviews
×
Best programme: Biology
Tampa, Florida, United States
4.60
Read more reviews
14 reviews
×
Best programme: BA International Relations and Diplomacy
lakeland, Fl, United States
4.80
Read more reviews
4 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting
Mayagüez, Puerto Rico
1.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Salem, Oregon, United States
4.80
Read more reviews
4 reviews
×
Best programme: Computer Science
New York City, United States
4.40
Read more reviews
5 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of Management & Technology
Category ratings
Facilities
4.21
4.24
3.92
4.50
1.00
5.00
Win
4.33
Location
4.23
3.89
4.93
Win
4.75
1.00
4.25
4.67
Professors
4.39
4.38
4.64
4.75
5.00
Win
4.50
4.25
Internationality
4.40
4.36
4.93
Win
4.00
4.50
4.25
4.50
Student life
4.14
4.31
4.15
4.75
Win
2.00
4.00
4.33
Value
4.07
4.10
4.29
4.25
1.00
4.75
Win
4.25
Accommodation
3.59
4.03
3.62
4.50
1.00
4.50
4.50
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Industry-focused learning with practical skills and career opportunities
  • +International environment and diverse student body
  • +Quality of teaching and faculty expertise
  • +Supportive faculty and engaging academic environment
  • +Modern facilities and vibrant campus life
  • +Welcoming atmosphere and diverse community
  • +Diverse student and educator backgrounds
  • +Opportunities for personal and career growth
  • +Supportive and organized academic environment
  • +Inspiring and supportive professors
  • +Innovative learning environment with cutting-edge technology
  • +Strong sense of community and expert faculty
  • +Engaging teaching & inspiring instructors
  • +Relevant curriculum & practical application
  • +Supportive learning environment & community
  • +Diverse academic programs and enriching opportunities
  • +Dedicated, knowledgeable, and accessible faculty
  • +Friendly, welcoming environment with personalized attention
  • +Experiential learning and business creation
  • +Industry leader insights and networking opportunities
  • +Diverse international environment and impactful outcomes
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues with communication, exam, and results handling.
  • -Perceived focus on financial gain over student welfare and education.
  • -Unhelpful or discriminatory faculty and poor academic program organization.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment are a common complaint.
  • -Lack of resources and support negatively impacts the learning experience.
  • -Limited extracurriculars and career opportunities.
  • -Poor quality of facilities and overall environment.
  • -Lack of academic rigor and student engagement.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a recurring problem.
  • -Poor communication and lack of student support are significant concerns.
  • -Poor administrative and support services.
  • -Unresolved financial and administrative issues.
  • -Lack of communication and accessible help.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning and comfort.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from the institution is prevalent.
  • -Disorganized and unresponsive administration.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Unengaging and ineffective teaching methods.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution garners strong evaluations, particularly in its **Professors** and **Internationality**, both scoring above 4.3. **Facilities**, **Location**, and **Student Life** also receive commendable marks, all exceeding 4.1. **Value** sits just above 4.0. The area with the lowest score is **Accomodation**, averaging 3.59.

Across key metrics, this institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **Professors** and **Internationality**, both receiving scores above 4.35. **Student Life** also garners excellent feedback, close behind. Conversely, the **Location** receives the lowest rating among the surveyed areas. Other aspects like **Facilities**, **Accomodation**, and **Value** fall within a good, solid range, indicating a generally positive but varied student experience.

The university exhibits exceptional strengths in its location and internationality, both scoring a near-perfect 4.93. Professors also receive high marks at 4.64, complemented by strong student life (4.15) and value (4.29). The weakest areas are facilities, rated at 3.92, and accommodation, which received a 3.62.

Across a comprehensive review, this institution demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly in its professors, location, and student life, all receiving an outstanding 4.75. Facilities and accommodation are also highly rated at 4.5. The weakest area identified is internationality, scoring 4, though the overall value remains strong at 4.25.

Academic strengths shine through with a perfect score for professors, and a strong showing in internationality. However, significant weaknesses are evident in facilities, location, accommodation, and overall value, all receiving the lowest possible rating. Student life also falls short of expectations.

Outstanding marks were awarded across most aspects of the university experience. Exceptional value for money stands out, alongside top scores for facilities and accommodation. The university also received strong ratings for its professors and international presence. While generally well-regarded, student life received the lowest score, indicating an area for potential improvement.

This institution garners strong overall evaluations, with location standing out as the highest-rated aspect at 4.67. Accommodations and internationality also received excellent scores of 4.5. Areas demonstrating solid performance include facilities and student life, both at 4.33, alongside value and professors, which are rated at 4.25.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Approximately 97.5% of reviews are positive, praising opportunities, industry links, and diverse student life. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions poor management and communication.

With an average rating of 4.18/5 from 39 reviews, approximately 93% of feedback is highly positive. Students frequently praise academic rigor, faculty support, modern facilities, and a vibrant campus life. No negative reviews were recorded.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with 13 out of 14 (93%) giving high ratings. Students praise the diverse educators and peer networks, cultural exposure, and opportunities for personal and academic growth. A small percentage of feedback (around 7%) mentions a lack of extracurricular activities and internship availability for earlier years.

Students praise dedicated professors who inspire learning and offer exceptional support. These educators are seen as mentors, providing guidance beyond class hours. The math department is highlighted as challenging but expert. No negative feedback was reported.

Both reviews are negative, highlighting terrible and unresponsive student support. Students reported issues with funding assistance and difficulty resolving inquiries, with ~100% of feedback being negative.

University reviews show a highly positive sentiment (~100%) with an average rating of 4.75/5. Recurring themes highlight a diverse range of programs, dedicated faculty, and a welcoming, personalized academic environment with small class sizes.

With an average rating of 4.4/5 from 5 reviews, students are highly satisfied. Recurring positive themes include practical, hands-on learning experiences and valuable networking opportunities. A minimal amount of feedback noted occasional scheduling issues with tutoring.

Rating distribution
5★
50%
21%
71%
75%
0%
75%
60%
4★
42%
77%
21%
25%
0%
25%
20%
3★
7%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
20%
2★
1%
0%
7%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
1%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Class of 2018, Int'l Business Administration

Studying at Skema Business School in Sophia Antipolis was a fantastic experience. The campus is modern and located in a wonderful tech hub. The professors bring real-world business experience to the classroom. I loved the multicultural environment and the group projects. Skema gave me great friends, a strong global network, and the right skills for my career.

Nothing to show

The cultural mix and the great atmosphere.

I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Loving it here!

Being here has been such a wild ride. Moving to a new country every semester and learning local languages has been both fun and challenging, but it's kinda exhausting too. Still, that hustle gives me an adrenaline rush I low-key love! The best part has been seeing our business ideas come to life and when people genuinely appreciate and engage with something we’ve built, it makes all the hard work worth it.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close