SKEMA Business School vs Columbia University vs Adelphi University vs Schiller International University vs Simplilearn
Side-by-side comparison from 228 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +strong international exposure & opportunities
- +practical and relevant program curriculum & skills
- +valuable alumni network & career support
- +Supportive and passionate faculty
- +Diverse and thoughtful food options
- +Affordable and accessible accommodation
- +Diverse and inclusive community
- +Strong academic programs and professors
- +Social events and activities
- +Culturally diverse environment and international campus access
- +Supportive and organized academic environment with helpful instructors
- +Opportunities for career advancement and independent learning
- +High-quality, in-demand skills taught by experts
- +Career-focused outcomes, especially remote tech jobs
- +Exceptional free and paid course content
- +Strong student support and resources
- +Experiential learning and entrepreneurship opportunities
- +Direct access to industry leaders (CXOs, CEOs)
- +Valuable networking and lifelong friendships
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and disorganization.
- -Perceived focus on profit over student welfare, with concerns about teaching quality and discrimination.
- -Ineffective career guidance and support for students.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are major drawbacks.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from instructors is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues create service inaccessibility and cause significant academic disruption.
- -Lack of support for students and alumni is a consistent problem.
- -Lack of extracurriculars and limited opportunities for lower-year students.
- -Poor campus environment and a perceived low academic standard.
- -Poor communication and lack of transparency from administration.
- -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources for learning.
- -Inflexible academic policies and unresponsive faculty.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a common complaint.
- -Course content and teaching methods are often criticized for being poor or ineffective.
- -Administrative and management issues are a major frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources are common complaints.
- -Poor communication and lack of transparency from the institution are frequently mentioned.
A comprehensive assessment reveals a university with distinct strengths and areas for improvement. Professors and internationality stand out as particularly strong aspects, receiving high marks. Student life and facilities are also rated positively. However, accommodation emerges as the weakest area, with a noticeably lower score compared to other metrics. Value for money is also a solid, though not exceptional, performer in this rating overview.
An analysis of the provided ratings reveals a university that excels in several key areas. Facilities stand out with a score of 4.49, closely followed by Internationality and Value, both receiving 4.44. Professors and Location also score highly at 4.37. Student Life is rated well at 4.35. The lowest rated aspect is Accomodation, with a score of 4.22, suggesting this is an area for potential improvement.
This institution garners high marks in several key areas, with location and accommodation particularly standing out with ratings of 4.25 and 4 respectively. Facilities also received a solid 4. The university's weakest points, however, lie in student life and internationality, both rated at 3.5. Professors are moderately well-regarded at 3.75, and the overall value is considered good at 4.
With a strong emphasis on location and internationality, this university also scores very well for its professors and student life. Value for money is also a positive aspect. The weakest areas, while still respectable, are its facilities and accommodation.
This institution receives overwhelmingly positive feedback. Facilities, professors, location, student life, internationality, and overall value are all rated a perfect 5. The sole area of concern is accommodation, which received a score of 0. This indicates a significant disconnect in housing provisions compared to other strengths.
This institution excels in several key areas, achieving perfect scores for its facilities, student life, and internationality. These aspects likely contribute significantly to a positive campus experience. Conversely, the university receives moderate ratings for its professors and accommodation, suggesting these could be areas for potential improvement. The location is also rated highly, indicating a desirable setting.
Across a range of metrics, the university demonstrates exceptional strengths, particularly in its Professors, Student Life, Internationality, and overall Value, all receiving perfect scores. Location, Facilities, and Accommodations also stand out with high ratings. While no specific area received a low score, the consistency across the board suggests a well-rounded institution with particularly strong offerings in teaching quality and student experience.
Around 97% of reviews are positive, praising international opportunities, practical curriculum, and helpful alumni networks. A small percentage (around 3%) cite issues with management, communication, and organization.
University feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~99%), with students praising the engaging academics and passionate professors. Some mention food variety and accommodation limitations.
Approximately 75% of reviews are positive, highlighting academic programs, diversity, and community. A smaller portion of feedback, about 25%, expresses dissatisfaction with university administration and support services.
With a 4.54/5 average rating, nearly all students praise Schiller for its culturally rich environment and global opportunities. A small portion of feedback (~7.7%) suggests the university may be better suited for those seeking a less demanding academic path.
The single review is highly positive, giving a 5/5 rating. This ~100% positive feedback highlights exceptional course content and the acquisition of in-demand digital skills beneficial for securing tech jobs.
With an average rating of 4/5, student feedback is predominantly positive. Students highlight the university's strong support systems, mentioning mental health and financial assistance programs. Approximately 0% of feedback is negative.
All three reviews are highly positive, averaging 5/5 stars. Students highlight real-world business experience, including product development and profit generation, and valuable learning from industry leaders. They also praise opportunities for international collaboration and lifelong friendships.
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Schiller university is the best thing that can ever happen to anyone l will never regret the day l applied and l mostly love their campus in Germany it has nice aesthetics and obviously l love their culture
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Being here has been such a wild ride. Moving to a new country every semester and learning local languages has been both fun and challenging, but it's kinda exhausting too. Still, that hustle gives me an adrenaline rush I low-key love! The best part has been seeing our business ideas come to life and when people genuinely appreciate and engage with something we’ve built, it makes all the hard work worth it.
