SKEMA Business School vs University of the People - UoPeople vs St. Mary's University, San Antonio vs Regent University vs Schiller International University
Side-by-side comparison from 3,243 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical, career-focused programs and skill development
- +Engaging student life and impactful associations
- +Strong academic faculty and international opportunities
- +Affordable and flexible online learning
- +Global and diverse student community
- +Supportive academic leadership and advisors
- +Extensive student support
- +Strong marketing and business programmes
- +Personalized growth and spiritual development support
- +Practical, applicable coursework and excellent teaching
- +Flexible learning options and helpful advising
- +Culturally diverse environment and international campus access
- +Supportive and organized academic environment with helpful instructors
- +Opportunities for career advancement and independent learning
- +Personalized academic support and professor engagement
- +Welcoming environment and genuine personal growth opportunities
- +Dedicated student support services and resources
- +Experiential learning and entrepreneurship opportunities
- +Direct access to industry leaders (CXOs, CEOs)
- +Valuable networking and lifelong friendships
- -Poor administrative and management issues, including communication and exam organization.
- -Focus on profit over student well-being and discriminatory practices.
- -Unorganized program structure and overwhelming course load.
- -Data breach and privacy concerns.
- -Hidden costs beyond "tuition-free" marketing.
- -Difficulties with online platform navigation and lack of community support.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are frequently criticized.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and a disconnect from real-world applications are common complaints.
- -Lack of extracurriculars and limited opportunities for lower-year students.
- -Poor campus environment and a perceived low academic standard.
- -Administrative and management issues are a major source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance detract from the learning environment.
- -Lack of resources and inadequate support services are frequently mentioned.
- -Administrative and management issues are a major frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources are common complaints.
- -Poor communication and lack of transparency from the institution are frequently mentioned.
This university receives high marks for its professors and internationality, with ratings of 4.42 and 4.35 respectively. Location and facilities are also well-regarded, both scoring above 4.2. Student life and value are rated around 4.0, indicating solid performance. The weakest area is accommodation, which receives a score of 3.59.
This institution garners exceptional praise for its **internationality**, with a near-perfect score, and for its **professors**, who also received outstanding marks. While the **value** for money is also highly rated, the university's **accommodation** emerges as a significant area for improvement, scoring considerably lower than other aspects. Other evaluated areas like facilities, location, and student life fall within a moderate to good range.
This institution excels in several key areas, achieving perfect scores for Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Accommodations. Value for money is also a significant strength, with a top rating. However, the university's weakest aspect is its Location, receiving a score of zero. Internationality is another area for improvement, scoring a moderate two.
This institution garners praise across several key areas, particularly excelling in its **Professors** with a perfect score of 5. Facilities and accommodation also receive high marks at 4.5. Student life is rated well at 4, reflecting a generally positive university experience. The weakest area, while still solid, is **Internationality**, scoring 4.25. Overall, the university presents a strong offering with notable strengths in teaching quality and campus resources.
With a strong emphasis on location and internationality, this university also scores very well for its professors and student life. Value for money is also a positive aspect. The weakest areas, while still respectable, are its facilities and accommodation.
Overall, this institution garners impressive scores, particularly excelling in its professors, facilities, internationality, and perceived value, all receiving outstanding ratings. Student life and accommodation also present as strong points. The location, however, stands out as the weakest area, scoring considerably lower than other surveyed aspects.
Across a range of metrics, the university demonstrates exceptional strengths, particularly in its Professors, Student Life, Internationality, and overall Value, all receiving perfect scores. Location, Facilities, and Accommodations also stand out with high ratings. While no specific area received a low score, the consistency across the board suggests a well-rounded institution with particularly strong offerings in teaching quality and student experience.
Approximately 90% of reviews are positive, highlighting great teachers, valuable student associations, and international opportunities. A small fraction of negative feedback, around 3%, mentions concerns with management, communication, and organization.
With a 4.88/5 average rating and 3040 positive reviews, students highlight accessible tuition-free education, flexible online learning, and a supportive global community. Negative feedback (~0.4%) notes difficulties with platform navigation and data security concerns.
With one review received, the average rating is 5/5 stars. The feedback highlights strong student support. No negative reviews were submitted.
With 100% positive sentiment, reviews highlight transformative personal and professional growth, practical and well-taught programs, and supportive, values-driven learning rooted in biblical principles. Tech resources could be improved.
With a 4.54/5 average rating, nearly all students praise Schiller for its culturally rich environment and global opportunities. A small portion of feedback (~7.7%) suggests the university may be better suited for those seeking a less demanding academic path.
All 5 reviews are positive (100%), with an average rating of 5/5. Students highlight personal growth, strong professor support, and a welcoming academic environment. No negative feedback was provided.
All three reviews are highly positive, averaging 5/5 stars. Students highlight real-world business experience, including product development and profit generation, and valuable learning from industry leaders. They also praise opportunities for international collaboration and lifelong friendships.
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
Studying at University of the People has been a rewarding experience. The tuition-free model made higher education accessible, and the online format allowed me to balance studies with work and family responsibilities. What stood out most was the diverse student community—interacting with classmates from around the world broadened my perspective and enriched discussions. Professors were supportive, and assignments encouraged critical thinking and practical application. On the improvement side, I’d like to see faster grading, more elective options in specialized fields, and stronger career services to help students transition into the workforce. Overall, UoPeople offers a valuable, flexible, and affordable path to higher education.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.
Nothing to show
Being here has been such a wild ride. Moving to a new country every semester and learning local languages has been both fun and challenging, but it's kinda exhausting too. Still, that hustle gives me an adrenaline rush I low-key love! The best part has been seeing our business ideas come to life and when people genuinely appreciate and engage with something we’ve built, it makes all the hard work worth it.
