SKEMA Business School vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie vs ESSCA School of Management vs ESG Ecoles de Commerce vs Sciences Po Aix
Side-by-side comparison from 201 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Industry relevance and practical skills
- +International exposure and diverse student body
- +Career opportunities and personal development
- +Practical, industry-relevant courses and inspiring professors
- +Rich international environment and diverse student body
- +Personal and professional development opportunities
- +Strong marketing & business programs
- +Excellent student support & community
- +Diverse academic pathways & practical experience
- +Practical, career-oriented education with real-life projects
- +Attentive and available staff and faculty
- +Diverse program options for professional development
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and disorganization.
- -Perceived focus on profit over student welfare and discriminatory practices.
- -Ineffective career guidance and problematic teaching faculty.
- -Financial concerns and perceived low educational value.
- -Unprepared and unhelpful professors with poor communication.
- -Irrelevant and outdated courses with a lack of student engagement.
- -Significant administrative and organizational issues.
- -Administrative and management issues caused significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources were frequently criticized.
- -Course content and teaching quality did not meet expectations.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Academic and social aspects of the institution received particularly high marks, with Professors and Internationality scoring above 4.3. Facilities and Location also performed well, both exceeding 4.2. Student Life and Value were rated positively around 4.1. The weakest area identified was Accomodation, which received a score of 3.58.
This institution garners excellent marks in several key areas. Facilities, Professors, Internationality, and Value all received high scores of 4.125. Student Life and Accommodations are rated lower, at 3.625 and approximately 3.57 respectively, indicating these are areas with more room for improvement compared to its other strengths. The Location score sits at 3.75.
This institution presents a mixed picture in its evaluations. It shines brightest in **Location**, achieving a score of over 4.1, closely followed by **Student Life** at 4.07 and **Professors** at 3.9. Conversely, **Accomodation** is its least favored aspect, with a rating of 3.37. The university also garners solid marks in Internationality and Value.
Professors and location stand out as exceptional strengths, receiving high marks. Student life, however, emerges as the weakest area with a noticeably lower rating. Facilities, accommodation, and internationality are rated solidly in the mid-range, contributing to an overall balanced profile with a strong emphasis on academic quality. The university also scores well for its value.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
~97.5% of 161 reviews are positive, highlighting practical, industry-oriented programs, excellent teaching, and international environments. A small ~2.5% of feedback mentions poor management and communication.
Most reviews praise the inspiring professors, practical learning, and international environment, contributing to a ~74% positive sentiment. One review expressed dissatisfaction, calling it a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
With ~87% positive feedback and an average rating of 3.93/5, students praise good knowledge transfer, specialization options, internship access, and vibrant campus life. A small portion of reviews mention unprepared professors and irrelevant courses.
With an average rating of 4/5, most reviews are positive, highlighting practical, career-oriented education and a modern campus with diverse activities. No negative feedback was recorded.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
Nothing to show
Overall, I had a positive experience at ESSCA. The programme is well organized and provides a solid foundation in business and management. The courses were generally of good quality and covered a broad range of topics, helping students develop both academic knowledge and practical skills. One of the aspects I appreciated most was the international exchange during the third year. ESSCA has a good network of partner universities, and the opportunity to study abroad was a valuable part of the programme. Student life is also a real strength of the school. The associative environment is active and offers many opportunities to get involved outside the classroom, meet new people, and gain additional experience. Like any programme, some courses were more engaging than others, but overall I found the experience enriching and would recommend it to students looking for a business school with a strong international dimension and a good balance between academics and extracurricular activities.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
