SKEMA Business School vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie vs Rochester Institute of Technology - RIT vs University of Birmingham Dubai - UOBD vs Middlesex University Dubai - MDX Dubai
Side-by-side comparison from 239 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Industry-focused learning with practical skills and career opportunities
- +International environment and diverse student body
- +Quality of teaching and faculty expertise
- +Practical, industry-relevant courses and inspiring professors
- +Rich international environment and diverse student body
- +Personal and professional development opportunities
- +Supportive faculty and engaging academic environment
- +Modern facilities and vibrant campus life
- +Welcoming atmosphere and diverse community
- +Excellent lecturers, teaching quality, and knowledgeable faculty.
- +Great campus facilities, infrastructure, and well-planned spaces.
- +Diverse student community with many societies and extracurricular activities.
- +Engaging and knowledgeable instructors
- +Supportive community and approachable staff
- +Relevant industry connections and practical learning
- +Helpful and empathetic faculty and staff
- +Good value for cost with high educational standards
- +Welcoming and community-oriented campus environment
- +Experiential learning and business creation
- +Industry leader insights and networking opportunities
- +Diverse international environment and impactful outcomes
- -Administrative and management issues with communication, exam, and results handling.
- -Perceived focus on financial gain over student welfare and education.
- -Unhelpful or discriminatory faculty and poor academic program organization.
- -Financial concerns and perceived low educational value.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a common complaint.
- -Lack of resources and support negatively impacts the learning experience.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are commonly criticized.
- -The curriculum is perceived as rigid and lacking relevance by many.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources frustrate students.
- -Poor communication and administrative issues create confusion and dissatisfaction.
- -Limited career support and unclear pathways hinder future prospects.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources are major drawbacks.
- -Poor communication and a lack of student support negatively impact the experience.
- -Disorganized and unresponsive administration.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Unengaging and ineffective teaching methods.
This institution garners strong evaluations, particularly in its **Professors** and **Internationality**, both scoring above 4.3. **Facilities**, **Location**, and **Student Life** also receive commendable marks, all exceeding 4.1. **Value** sits just above 4.0. The area with the lowest score is **Accomodation**, averaging 3.59.
This institution garners excellent marks in several key areas. Facilities, Professors, Internationality, and Value all received high scores of 4.125. Student Life and Accommodations are rated lower, at 3.625 and approximately 3.57 respectively, indicating these are areas with more room for improvement compared to its other strengths. The Location score sits at 3.75.
Across key metrics, this institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **Professors** and **Internationality**, both receiving scores above 4.35. **Student Life** also garners excellent feedback, close behind. Conversely, the **Location** receives the lowest rating among the surveyed areas. Other aspects like **Facilities**, **Accomodation**, and **Value** fall within a good, solid range, indicating a generally positive but varied student experience.
This institution receives commendable ratings in several key areas, with its **Value** standing out as the strongest at 4.57. **Student Life** and **Internationality** also score very well, both above 4.2. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the weakest area, with a rating of 2.67, indicating a significant need for improvement in this aspect. Other categories such as Facilities and Professors are rated positively, while Location scores moderately.
This institution receives particularly high marks for its professors and internationality, both scoring an impressive 4.5. Students also appreciate the location with a rating of 4.15. The weakest area appears to be accommodation, which received a 3.54 rating. Facilities and student life both earned a solid 4, while value for money sits at a respectable 3.93.
This institution garners strong marks, particularly excelling in **Professors** and **Location**, both receiving 4.6 out of 5. **Facilities**, **Student Life**, and **Internationality** also score well at 4. The **Accomodation** rating of 3.8 stands out as the lowest, though still respectable, in this comprehensive evaluation. Overall, the university presents a positive image with a particularly robust academic and geographical offering.
This institution garners strong overall evaluations, with location standing out as the highest-rated aspect at 4.67. Accommodations and internationality also received excellent scores of 4.5. Areas demonstrating solid performance include facilities and student life, both at 4.33, alongside value and professors, which are rated at 4.25.
Approximately 97.5% of reviews are positive, praising opportunities, industry links, and diverse student life. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions poor management and communication.
Most reviews praise the inspiring professors, practical learning, and international environment, contributing to a ~74% positive sentiment. One review expressed dissatisfaction, calling it a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
With an average rating of 4.18/5 from 39 reviews, approximately 93% of feedback is highly positive. Students frequently praise academic rigor, faculty support, modern facilities, and a vibrant campus life. No negative reviews were recorded.
All 7 reviews are positive, reflecting an average rating of 4.57/5. Students praise excellent lecturers, well-managed timetables, great campus life, and quality facilities. The diverse community and engaging extracurricular activities are also recurring themes.
With a strong average rating of 4.14/5 from 14 reviews, students praise engaging lecturers and flexible learning modes. Supportive faculty, industry connections, and a diverse community are recurring themes. There is no negative feedback.
All five reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.2/5. Students highlight convenient programs, amazing faculty, excellent value, and a positive campus atmosphere. No negative feedback was provided.
With an average rating of 4.4/5 from 5 reviews, students are highly satisfied. Recurring positive themes include practical, hands-on learning experiences and valuable networking opportunities. A minimal amount of feedback noted occasional scheduling issues with tutoring.
Studying at Skema Business School in Sophia Antipolis was a fantastic experience. The campus is modern and located in a wonderful tech hub. The professors bring real-world business experience to the classroom. I loved the multicultural environment and the group projects. Skema gave me great friends, a strong global network, and the right skills for my career.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Being here has been such a wild ride. Moving to a new country every semester and learning local languages has been both fun and challenging, but it's kinda exhausting too. Still, that hustle gives me an adrenaline rush I low-key love! The best part has been seeing our business ideas come to life and when people genuinely appreciate and engage with something we’ve built, it makes all the hard work worth it.
