SKEMA Business School vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie vs Rochester Institute of Technology - RIT vs American University in Dubai - AUD vs Amity University Dubai
Side-by-side comparison from 347 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +International focus and diverse campus experiences
- +Practical, industry-relevant curriculum and career support
- +Strong community with great classmates and alumni network
- +Connecting theory to practice through real-world cases.
- +Diverse international environment and global opportunities.
- +Relevant industry-focused courses and knowledgeable faculty.
- +Supportive faculty and engaging academic environment
- +Modern facilities and vibrant campus life
- +Welcoming atmosphere and diverse community
- +Challenging curriculum and top-tier faculty
- +Practical, hands-on learning opportunities
- +Vibrant campus life and diverse student body
- +Supportive faculty and staff
- +Holistic development and practical experience
- +Engaging campus life and facilities
- +Helpful and empathetic faculty and staff
- +Good value for cost with high educational standards
- +Welcoming and community-oriented campus environment
- +Experiential learning and entrepreneurship opportunities
- +Direct access to industry leaders (CXOs, CEOs)
- +Valuable networking and lifelong friendships
- -Administrative and management issues create poor student experience.
- -Ineffective communication and guidance hinder career development.
- -Faculty and program organization are disappointing and overly focused on profit.
- -Perceived as a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a common complaint.
- -Lack of resources and support negatively impacts the learning experience.
- -Administrative and management issues are a constant source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor campus maintenance are frequently criticized.
- -Lack of effective communication and transparency from the administration is a major concern.
- -Poor communication, delays, and unprofessional staff lead to a frustrating experience.
- -Lack of practical learning opportunities, such as events and field trips, is a significant drawback.
- -The quality of teaching and faculty experience does not justify the high fees.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources are major drawbacks.
- -Poor communication and a lack of student support negatively impact the experience.
- -Administrative and management issues are a major frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources are common complaints.
- -Poor communication and lack of transparency from the institution are frequently mentioned.
Across a range of metrics, this institution demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly in its **professors** (4.41) and **internationality** (4.36). Facilities and location also received favorable scores, both above 4.2. Student life and value are rated around 4.0, indicating a generally positive experience. The weakest area is **accommodation**, which stands at 3.56, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect.
This institution performs well across most aspects, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest area. Facilities, Professors, and Value also receive high marks. Areas for potential improvement include **Location**, which scored the lowest, and Accomodation. Student life and the overall value proposition are rated solidly in the mid-to-high range.
Across key metrics, this institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **Professors** and **Internationality**, both receiving scores above 4.35. **Student Life** also garners excellent feedback, close behind. Conversely, the **Location** receives the lowest rating among the surveyed areas. Other aspects like **Facilities**, **Accomodation**, and **Value** fall within a good, solid range, indicating a generally positive but varied student experience.
This institution demonstrates strong performance across various aspects, with professors receiving the highest marks at 4.56. Location and value also stand out as significant strengths at 4.51 and 4.5 respectively. The facilities, rated at 4.31, are a slightly weaker area compared to the overwhelmingly positive scores in other categories, though still well-regarded. Overall, the university shows a well-rounded positive reception from students.
Facilities stand out as the strongest area, earning a high rating. Conversely, Value and Accomodation received the lowest scores among the assessed categories. Student Life and Internationality also performed well, indicating positive student experiences. Professors and Location are rated moderately, suggesting room for improvement in these aspects of the university experience.
This institution garners strong marks, particularly excelling in **Professors** and **Location**, both receiving 4.6 out of 5. **Facilities**, **Student Life**, and **Internationality** also score well at 4. The **Accomodation** rating of 3.8 stands out as the lowest, though still respectable, in this comprehensive evaluation. Overall, the university presents a positive image with a particularly robust academic and geographical offering.
Across a range of metrics, the university demonstrates exceptional strengths, particularly in its Professors, Student Life, Internationality, and overall Value, all receiving perfect scores. Location, Facilities, and Accommodations also stand out with high ratings. While no specific area received a low score, the consistency across the board suggests a well-rounded institution with particularly strong offerings in teaching quality and student experience.
The vast majority (~97%) of reviews are positive, praising international opportunities, practical curriculum, and strong alumni networks. A small percentage (~3%) express concerns about management, communication, and organization.
Most reviews (approximately 71%) highlight a positive learning atmosphere, inspiring professors, and valuable international experiences. A small amount of feedback (around 14%) suggests mediocrity and a focus on profit. The average rating is 3.86/5.
With an average rating of 4.18/5 from 39 reviews, approximately 93% of feedback is highly positive. Students frequently praise academic rigor, faculty support, modern facilities, and a vibrant campus life. No negative reviews were recorded.
All 48 reviews are positive, averaging 4.19/5. Students highlight academic excellence, challenging curriculum, knowledgeable faculty, and practical learning opportunities. A vibrant campus life and diverse student body also contribute to their positive experiences.
With an average rating of 3.8/5, ~74% of 112 reviews are positive, highlighting approachable faculty and growth opportunities. A small ~7% of feedback noted issues like unprofessionalism and communication delays.
All five reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.2/5. Students highlight convenient programs, amazing faculty, excellent value, and a positive campus atmosphere. No negative feedback was provided.
All three reviews are highly positive, averaging 5/5 stars. Students highlight real-world business experience, including product development and profit generation, and valuable learning from industry leaders. They also praise opportunities for international collaboration and lifelong friendships.
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Amity University's Aerospace Engineering bachelor's program offers a comprehensive blend of theoretical knowledge and practical exposure in the field of aviation and aerospace technology. The curriculum is well-structured, covering essential subjects such as aerodynamics, aircraft propulsion, avionics, and space technology. The faculty members are generally supportive and knowledgeable, although some students have noted variations in teaching quality across different courses. The university's infrastructure includes laboratories and research facilities that facilitate learning and experimentation. On the downside, there have been occasional concerns about administrative processes and campus amenities, which could be improved to enhance overall student experience. Another downside is that the university does not provide any form of placements. Additionally, while the program covers a broad spectrum of topics, some students feel that certain specialized areas could be explored in greater depth. In conclusion, Amity University's Aerospace Engineering program provides a solid foundation for students aspiring to enter the aerospace industry. With its practical approach and decent faculty support. Prospective students should consider visiting the campus and researching recent student feedback to make an informed decision about joining the program.
Nothing to show
Being here has been such a wild ride. Moving to a new country every semester and learning local languages has been both fun and challenging, but it's kinda exhausting too. Still, that hustle gives me an adrenaline rush I low-key love! The best part has been seeing our business ideas come to life and when people genuinely appreciate and engage with something we’ve built, it makes all the hard work worth it.
