Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso - UFMT vs SKEMA Business School vs Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais - UFMG vs International School of Management vs Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul - UFRGS
Side-by-side comparison from 247 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Exceptional faculty and qualified professors
- +Good campus facilities and infrastructure
- +Career-boosting programs and support
- +Practical skills and real-world business application
- +International environment and diverse experiences
- +Career development and professional growth
- +High-quality teaching and dedicated professors
- +Excellent preparation for the job market
- +Strong academic and research focus
- +Expert professors and quality cohorts
- +Flexible learning and personalized support
- +Global exposure and networking opportunities
- +Dedicated, empathetic, and researcher professors providing practical, dense learning
- +Inspiring learning and growth opportunities with research access
- +Accessible resources like the University Restaurant and interdisciplinary course options
- +Exceptional teaching quality from passionate, experienced instructors
- +Unmatched precision, emphasis on quality, and professional skill development
- +Welcoming environment, strong support, and valuable alumni network
- +Excellent faculty and academic reputation
- +Good research and outreach programs
- -Outdated facilities and lack of research support.
- -Poor career guidance and pathway planning.
- -Administrative & management issues
- -Poor communication and guidance
- -Outdated facilities and teaching faculty
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are prevalent concerns.
- -Instruction quality and course content are frequently cited as disappointing.
- -Poor communication and administrative issues are common complaints.
- -Facilities are often described as outdated or in disrepair.
- -Course content and teaching quality are frequently criticized.
- -Administrative & management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment frustrate students.
- -Poor communication and lack of support are frequently mentioned.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are disappointing.
- -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world needs.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are a major concern.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and lack of student support are frequently criticized.
- -Administrative and management issues create unnecessary frustration.
Academic quality stands out, with professors receiving an impressive 4.625, closely followed by its advantageous location at 4.5. Conversely, internationality scored the lowest at 3.5. Other aspects like facilities, accommodation, and student life fall within a solid mid-range. The university offers good value for its offerings, indicated by a 4.125 score in that area.
Across surveyed categories, this institution demonstrates robust strengths in **Internationality (4.43)** and **Professors (4.37)**. Student life, location, and facilities also received positive scores. However, **Accomodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at **3.70**, suggesting potential room for improvement in that specific aspect. The overall value is also rated favorably at 4.09.
Perceptions of this institution reveal a strong emphasis on its **location** and **value**, both scoring exceptionally high. Student life and internationality also receive positive, though slightly lower, marks. The weakest areas appear to be **accommodation** and **facilities**, which, while still rated above average, are the lowest-scoring aspects in this evaluation. Professors and overall facilities also received solid scores.
This institution garners exceptional praise, particularly for its professors and international student experience, both scoring a near-perfect 4.82. Facilities, location, and accommodation also received strong marks around 4.64. Student life earned a solid 4.5, while value was rated a commendable 4.73. The university's weakest area, though still strong, is student life.
With strong endorsements for its professors and perceived value, this institution garners positive feedback. Students also appreciate the campus location and vibrant student life. However, the facilities and accommodation received the lowest scores, indicating areas for potential improvement. Internationality also sits in the mid-range of ratings.
This university demonstrates exceptional strength in its **location** (4.7), **professors** (4.6), and **internationality** (4.6). Students are particularly impressed with the quality of instruction and the global environment. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at 3.0, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Student life and value for money also received moderate scores.
Overall, this institution demonstrates a solid performance, with notable strengths in its **Professors**, **Location**, **Student Life**, and **Value**, all receiving a high rating of 4. Conversely, **Internationality** stands out as a weaker area, scoring a 2. The **Facilities** and **Accomodation** are rated moderately at 3.
Eight out of nine reviews are positive (approximately 89%), highlighting exceptional faculty, a strong educational experience, and a good campus with great infrastructure. One review (approximately 11%) notes issues with infrastructure and career support.
With a 4.37/5 average rating from 175 reviews, approximately 97.7% of students provide positive feedback. Key highlights include practical skills, international opportunities, and professional development. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions poor management and organization.
With an average rating of 4.6/5 from 10 reviews, ~80% are positive. Students praise teaching quality, dedicated professors, and excellent facilities. A few mentioned a need for more professional education alongside academic focus.
All 11 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.64/5. Students praise the high quality of professors, impressive and diverse student cohorts, and flexible learning options. The curriculum is described as relevant and contemporary, fostering significant personal and career growth.
With an average rating of 4.4/5, ~93% of reviews are positive. Students praise dedicated professors, research opportunities, and inspiring learning experiences. Some mention infrastructure could improve, but this is a minor point.
Students highly praise the exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable instructors. Facilities are noted as impeccable and the learning environment welcoming, contributing to professional and personal growth for ~100% of reviewers.
This university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~100% of reviews being favorable. Students praise the faculty and research programs, though some mention uneven resource allocation and infrastructure issues.
Nothing to show
Studying at Skema Business School in Sophia Antipolis was a fantastic experience. The campus is modern and located in a wonderful tech hub. The professors bring real-world business experience to the classroom. I loved the multicultural environment and the group projects. Skema gave me great friends, a strong global network, and the right skills for my career.
Nothing to show
I am just starting my PhD journey and I could not be happier with my choice in ISM. Amazing experience with quality professors AND impressive cohorts. Working full-time, this educational focus would not be feasible if I was not able to be flexible as to when and where I take my classes. It is a tough, long, and robust path that requires focus, but the team at ISM is truly the best. They help navigate the way that will work best for you and not put you in a 'one way fits all' situation to accomplish this massive step. I wanted a global education that was through a recognized, accredited, and respected school and ISM has not just been that, but so much more.
Nothing to show
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
Nothing to show
