Ecole Nationale des Sciences Appliquées de Kenitra - ENSAK vs University of Plymouth vs Kean University - KU vs Ibn Tofail University - UIT vs Higher Institute for Applied Sciences and Technology - HIAST
Side-by-side comparison from 50 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Diverse engineering majors and foundational learning
- +Abundant extracurricular opportunities
- +Supportive, expert lecturers and staff.
- +Well-equipped, modern facilities and resources.
- +Positive overall university experience and city location.
- +Abundant student opportunities and support services
- +Attractive campus environment and decent housing
- +Academic growth and skill development
- +Supportive and inclusive learning environment
- +Committed and helpful faculty
- +Prestigious, rigorous applied sciences and engineering education
- +High-quality graduates well-prepared for careers
- +Specialized focus on telecommunications, microwave, and RF engineering
Nothing to show
- +Engaging faculty and strong academic support
- +Diverse course offerings and practical learning opportunities
- +Well-equipped campus facilities and student amenities
- -Administrative and management issues
- -Outdated facilities and equipment
- -Lack of clear communication and support
- -Unresponsive and unhelpful administration and faculty.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Overcrowded classes and insufficient resources.
- -Administrative & management issues are a major source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Poor communication and a disconnect with faculty are frequently cited problems.
- -Administrative and management issues are a common source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are frequently criticized.
- -Poor communication and a disconnect from student needs are prevalent complaints.
- -Unresponsive or unhelpful administrative and management issues
- -Outdated facilities and resources
- -Lack of engaging or relevant curriculum
Nothing to show
- -Poor administrative and management support
- -Outdated facilities and equipment
- -Lack of practical application and job readiness
This institution presents a uniform rating of zero across all surveyed categories, including facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value. Consequently, no specific areas stand out as strengths or weaknesses, as all aspects of the university appear to be rated equally low.
This university garners strong approval, particularly for its **Location** and **Student Life**, both receiving a perfect 4.41. **Facilities** are also well-regarded at 4.21. **Professors** and **Value** are rated identically at 4.10, indicating a solid academic and financial standing. The university's **Internationality** scores a respectable 3.97. Its **Accomodation** stands out as the lowest-rated aspect, with a score of 3.66.
This institution receives strong ratings for its **Professors**, **Student Life**, and **Value**, all scoring a commendable 4 out of 5. Facilities and Accomodation are rated adequately at 3, while Internationality also lands at this midpoint. The university's weakest area is its **Location**, receiving a score of 0, which significantly impacts its overall appeal.
Evaluations indicate a strong academic environment with high scores for Professors (4.36) and Facilities (4.29). Value for money also scores well at 4.14. Areas for improvement include Accomodation (3.54) and Internationality (3.43), which received the lowest ratings. Student Life (3.79) and Location (4.00) fall in the mid-range.
This institution shines brightest in **Student Life** and **Internationality**, both receiving perfect scores. **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Accommodation** are also strong points, earning solid 4s. However, **Location** is a significant weakness, with a score of 0, and **Value** sits at a moderate 3, indicating areas for improvement.
Nothing to show
This institution excels in several key areas, boasting top marks for Facilities, Location, and Student Life, all rated at 4.5. Accommodations and Internationality also receive strong scores. Areas with room for improvement include Professors and Value, both rated at 3.67.
The single review rates the university 5/5, indicating a highly positive sentiment (~100%). The feedback highlights a variety of engineering majors and extracurriculars.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~80% of feedback being highly favorable. Students praise the city's offerings, excellent course content, and supportive staff. No negative reviews were recorded.
This university receives a high rating of 4/5 stars, with all feedback being positive. Students appreciate ample opportunities in research, scholarships, study abroad, and campus employment.
With an average rating of 4.07/5, ~79% of reviews are positive, highlighting academic growth, supportive environments, and committed lecturers. No negative feedback was recorded.
With a single review, this university has a 4/5 average rating. The sole feedback was positive, highlighting a prestigious education and rigorous assessment that prepares graduates well for careers.
Nothing to show
Reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%), with students highlighting good facilities, helpful teachers, and diverse course options. Some mention fast Wi-Fi and budget-friendly fees. A minor point noted was that online master's classes could feel rushed.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show