Abo Akademi University - AAU vs Aalto University vs South-Eastern Finland University of Applied Sciences - XAMK vs Estonian Business School - EBS vs Hanken School of Economics

Side-by-side comparison from 85 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Hanken School of Economics (5.00)
Abo Akademi University - AAU: wins 2/2 categories
Aalto University: wins 0/2 categories
South-Eastern Finland University of Applied Sciences - XAMK: wins 0/2 categories
Estonian Business School - EBS: wins 0/2 categories
Hanken School of Economics: wins 0/2 categories
University of Turku: wins 0/2 categories
Turku University of Applied Sciences: wins 0/2 categories
Comparing
Best programme: French
Espoo, Finland
4.70
Read more reviews
36 reviews
×
Best programme: Computer Engineering
Best programme: BHC in Nursing
Best programme: International Business Administration
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Marketing and Management
Best programme: Information Technology
Best programme: Applied Social Science
Category ratings
Facilities
5.00
4.39
4.79
3.98
5.00
4.25
4.50
Location
5.00
Win
4.06
4.50
4.95
4.00
3.88
3.50
Professors
5.00
4.11
4.92
4.67
5.00
4.25
3.50
Internationality
5.00
4.33
4.75
4.25
2.00
4.00
5.00
Student life
5.00
4.30
4.54
4.17
5.00
3.71
4.50
Value
5.00
4.36
4.75
4.40
5.00
4.13
4.50
Accommodation
5.00
Win
4.24
4.42
2.42
4.00
3.88
4.50
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive and helpful faculty/staff
  • +Excellent facilities and central location
  • +Welcoming international environment and diverse programs
  • +Rigorous, independent learning with practical, hands-on experience
  • +Active student life, community support, and multidisciplinary collaboration
  • +Flexible course options and excellent facilities
  • +Passionate, supportive, and communicative educators
  • +Practical, career-focused programmes and real-world connections
  • +International atmosphere and flexible learning paths
  • +Practical, skill-focused academics and helpful professors
  • +Value for money and flexibility for combining study with work
  • +Internationality and diverse academic and career opportunities
  • +High teaching quality and experienced lecturers
  • +Engaging international environment
  • +Helpful support services
  • +Approachable professors & strong academic programs
  • +Welcoming city & positive student community
  • +Good accommodation & proximity to campus
  • +Practical, hands-on learning with real-world projects.
  • +Industry-relevant programs and career preparation.
  • +Innovative, student-centered approach.
Cons
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration and inefficiency.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance create an unpleasant learning environment.
  • -Lack of support and resources hinders academic success and well-being.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology are a significant drawback.
  • -Lack of support and engagement from staff is concerning.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and transparency from staff creates confusion.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are consistently criticized.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or poorly structured by many students.
  • -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are a recurring complaint.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or poorly implemented.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of effective communication and support is a problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Course content is irrelevant or too theoretical.
Rating summary
What students say

Exceptional ratings paint a picture of a top-tier institution. This university achieves a perfect score of 5 out of 5 in every surveyed category, including facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value. No single area stands out as significantly stronger or weaker than the others, as all aspects are consistently rated at the highest level.

With a generally strong showing across multiple aspects, this university excels in **Facilities**, receiving a high rating of 4.39. **Internationality** and **Value** also scored well, both above 4.3. Conversely, **Location** presents the weakest area, with a rating of 4.06. The university demonstrates robust performance in student-focused categories like **Student Life** and **Accomodation**, while **Professors** also maintain a solid score.

This institution earns exceptionally high marks, particularly in the **professors** category with a near-perfect score. **Facilities** and **internationality** also stand out with strong ratings. Areas receiving slightly lower, though still positive, scores include **student life** and **accommodation**. Overall, the university demonstrates a well-rounded positive profile.

This institution receives particularly high marks for its Location, scoring an impressive 4.95, and Professors, rated at 4.67. Students also appreciate the Internationality and Value, with scores of 4.25 and 4.4 respectively. The weakest area identified is Accomodation, with a rating of 2.42, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Facilities and Student Life also received solid, though not exceptional, scores.

This institution excels in several key areas, boasting perfect scores for Facilities, Professors, and Student Life, alongside a strong rating for Value. Accommodations are also well-regarded. However, the university's Internationality score is notably lower than other aspects, indicating a potential area for development. The location also received a good, but not perfect, rating.

Overall, this university garners strong ratings across several key areas. Facilities and professors are particularly well-regarded, both receiving 4.25. Internationality is also a positive, scoring a 4. Value for money is also strong at 4.125. The weakest areas appear to be student life (3.71) and location and accommodation, both rated at 3.875.

Overall, this university garners strong positive feedback, particularly excelling in its **Internationality** (5.0), with equally impressive scores for **Facilities**, **Student Life**, and **Accomodation** (all 4.5). The **Value** for money is also highly rated at 4.5. Areas for potential improvement are **Professors** and **Location**, both receiving a score of 3.5.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Five out of six reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise the supportive environment, helpful staff, and excellent infrastructure.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~92% 4-5 stars), highlighting strong academic challenges, independent learning, and active student life with multidisciplinary opportunities. A small amount of feedback (~8%) suggests courses may be too short to fully grasp topics.

All 26 reviews are positive, averaging 4.88/5. Students praise practical, student-centered education, supportive teachers, and innovation. A minor concern was difficulty securing clinical practice due to language skills.

All 6 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students praise the excellent academics and helpful professors, noting practical learning and international focus.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating from one review, this university is highly praised for its excellent teaching quality and strong international environment. Positive feedback highlights engaging academics and helpful support services.

All 8 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.25/5. Students praise well-structured programs, approachable professors, and a strong sense of community. The city of Turku is also frequently mentioned as a positive aspect.

With an average rating of 4.5/5, the two reviews are overwhelmingly positive. Students highlight practical, industry-relevant education and hands-on learning experiences. No negative feedback was received.

Rating distribution
5★
50%
56%
88%
67%
100%
25%
50%
4★
33%
39%
12%
33%
0%
75%
50%
3★
17%
11%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Student

Aalto University is honestly such an amazing place. The campus is right in the middle of nature, with woods and water all around. The student life here is super active, there are tons of student clubs that host different events all over the week, which provide great opportunities to make some new friends! One thing that really surprised me was how multidisciplinary the courses are. Being able to collaborate in diverse teams of designers and engineers is a rare opportunity that simply doesn't exist at many other institutions. It really pushes you to think outside the box and reflect more deeply on your work. P.S. If you’re lucky, you can even catch the Northern Lights right from campus!

My experience studying nursing at Xamk.

Studying nursing at Xamk has been a practical and rewarding experience to me regardless of my previous background in-terms of profession. The programme strongly focuses on hands-on skills, simulation training, and clinical placements, which has helped me connect theory directly to real nursing practice. The teachers are supportive and approachable, and the learning environment encourages growth both professionally and personally, being able to also learn a new language (Finnish) within a short period of time with the help of Xamk has been a great milestone to me. Overall, Xamk has prepared me well for working life in healthcare.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close