Tampere University - TUNI vs Aalto University vs South-Eastern Finland University of Applied Sciences - XAMK vs University of Eastern Finland vs University of Oulu - OY
Side-by-side comparison from 113 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive faculty and flexible personal study plans
- +Welcoming international environment and diverse student body
- +Well-structured programs with practical application and research opportunities
- +Flexible and multidisciplinary learning
- +Strong foundational and independent learning
- +Supportive community and active student life
- +Dedicated, supportive, and passionate faculty
- +Well-organized, modern campus and facilities
- +Strong industry connections and practical, future-focused education
- +Practical study experience with supportive faculty and accessible campus facilities.
- +Welcoming and diverse campus environment fostering social opportunities.
- +Efficient education and proximity to nature for leisure.
- +High-quality education and strong programs, especially in ICT and wireless technology.
- +Supportive and international learning environment with modern facilities.
- +Good city life, student culture, and career preparation support.
Nothing to show
- +Industry connection and practical experience
- +Relevant, real-world focused curriculum
- -Administrative and management issues, particularly due to university reforms.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration and inefficiency.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning and comfort.
- -Lack of engaging teaching and poor curriculum design lead to dissatisfaction.
- -Excessive administrative burdens and disorganized management plague student experiences.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities create a frustrating learning environment.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff leads to student dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor resource allocation are consistently criticized.
- -A lack of effective teaching and curriculum relevance is a major concern.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a common source of dissatisfaction.
- -Lack of effective teaching and engaging curriculum is a recurring problem.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a persistent problem.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring complaint.
The university garners significant acclaim, particularly in **Student Life**, which stands out with a 4.74 rating. **Facilities** also score very highly at 4.63. Areas such as **Accomodation** (4.24), **Professors** (4.26), and **Value** (4.26) show solid performance. **Internationality** is rated at 4.11, and **Location** is the lowest scored category at 4.06, though still strong.
This university receives strong commendations, particularly for its **Student Life** and **Facilities**, both scoring above 4.5. **Accomodation** and **Value** are also highly rated, each at 4.39. **Professors** represent the lowest-scoring area, though still rated positively. The university demonstrates a well-rounded profile with notable strengths in its campus environment and student experience.
This institution garners exceptional scores, with Professors receiving the highest marks at 4.92 and Facilities a very close second at 4.8. Student Life and Location also scored highly, both above 4.5. The weakest area, though still strong, is Accomodation with a rating of 4.44. Internationality and Value are tied for the second-highest scores.
This institution garners exceptional scores, notably achieving a perfect 5 for Student Life. Facilities, Professors, and Accommodation are also highly rated at 4.33. Location and Internationality are solid at 4, with Value also receiving a 4. The weakest area, though still positive, is Value at 4.
This institution excels significantly in its **Facilities** and **Value**, both receiving near-perfect scores. **Accomodation** is also a strong point. Conversely, the **Location** is the weakest area, indicating potential drawbacks in this aspect. **Student Life** and **Internationality** show moderate performance, suggesting room for improvement in fostering a vibrant campus experience and a more global outlook.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **internationality**, achieving a perfect score, and its **facilities**, **professors**, and **accommodation**, all receiving high marks. Conversely, the **location** stands out as its weakest area, indicated by a lower rating. Student life and overall value are rated respectably in the middle tier.
With a 4.43 average rating from 35 reviews, approximately 74% praise the inclusive environment, supportive teachers, and flexible study plans. A small portion (~3%) notes declining teaching quality due to university reformation.
Students highly recommend the university, praising its multidisciplinary courses and freedom to study outside their major (~90%). Positive feedback highlights independent learning, excellent facilities, and strong community support, with no reported negative reviews.
With a 4.89/5 average rating from 27 reviews, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight great professors, international focus, and excellent organization. Positive themes include modern facilities and strong industry connections.
All feedback is positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5 stars. Students highlight practical study experiences, excellent welfare and social activities, and a welcoming, diverse campus environment.
All 7 reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 4.86/5. Students praise the high-quality education, excellent facilities, and supportive, international environment, particularly in ICT and health tech. No negative feedback was reported.
Nothing to show
This single review offers a positive perspective, highlighting strong industry connections and relevant, real-world focused coursework. The average rating is 4/5, with 100% of feedback being positive.
Nothing to show
I graduated from Aalto University's School of Business, majoring in Marketing, and I'd genuinely recommend it. What made the biggest difference for me, though, was the freedom to take courses outside my own major. I ended up mixing in some technology and design courses with my marketing courses, and that has turned out to be one of the most useful parts of my degree.
Studying nursing at Xamk has been a practical and rewarding experience to me regardless of my previous background in-terms of profession. The programme strongly focuses on hands-on skills, simulation training, and clinical placements, which has helped me connect theory directly to real nursing practice. The teachers are supportive and approachable, and the learning environment encourages growth both professionally and personally, being able to also learn a new language (Finnish) within a short period of time with the help of Xamk has been a great milestone to me. Overall, Xamk has prepared me well for working life in healthcare.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
