Staffordshire University - Staffs vs University of Essex vs Liverpool John Moores University vs Edge Hill Business School vs Kent Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 180 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Engaging curriculum with real-world applicability
- +Exceptional student support and guidance
- +Quality teaching and excellent facilities
- +Helpful and approachable faculty
- +Diverse and enriching programs
- +Positive campus and community atmosphere
- +Engaging teaching and relevant curriculum.
- +Strong career support and real-world opportunities.
- +Vibrant student life and city location.
- +excellent student support
- +engaging remote learning
- +Supportive and dedicated lecturers
- +Diverse and enriching culture
- +Good value accommodation and scenic environment
- +Practical, group-focused learning and professional initiation.
- +High-quality teaching and supportive faculty mentorship.
- +Strong professional network and vibrant student life.
- +International relevance & practical/hands-on experience
- +Welcoming & supportive environment with friendly, helpful staff/faculty
- +Diverse, small classes with experienced professors
- -Ineffective or unresponsive instructors.
- -Poorly maintained and outdated facilities.
- -Unclear or inconsistent administrative processes.
- -Poor transport links and inconvenient location
- -Unsupportive and unhelpful faculty
- -Unfair and unclear assessment feedback
- -Unfulfilled promises and course changes without notice.
- -Frustration with administrative and management issues.
- -Concerns about outdated facilities and resources.
- -Dissatisfaction with course content and teaching quality.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Lack of student support and communication is a major concern.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
- -Lack of student support and responsiveness from administration.
- -Uninspiring curriculum and teaching methods.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are often criticized.
- -Poor teaching quality and unengaging course content are commonly cited.
The university demonstrates excellent performance in several key areas, particularly excelling in **Facilities** with a score of 4.54. **Student Life** and **Internationality** also received strong marks, indicating positive student experiences and a global outlook. Conversely, the **Location** garnered the lowest rating at 4.09, suggesting it may be an area for potential improvement compared to other aspects of university life.
With an impressive score of 4.32, facilities stand out as a key strength, closely matched by internationality at 4.32. Professors are also highly rated at 4.14, contributing to good value. Location and accommodation, while solid, received slightly lower scores, at 3.80 and 3.86 respectively, representing the areas with the most room for improvement within the university's overall positive standing.
Considering the provided feedback, the university excels in its **location**, boasting the highest score. **Student life** and **professors** also receive strong commendations. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the area with the lowest rating. The university presents a generally positive overview, with a notable need for improvement in its housing provisions.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strength, receiving perfect scores for its facilities, professors, accommodation, internationality, and overall value. Student life and location are also highly rated, scoring a respectable 4 out of 5. The university's weakest areas, though still very positive, are student life and location, suggesting minor room for improvement in these aspects while excelling elsewhere.
Excelling in several aspects, this university received its highest marks for Location (4.88) and tied for second highest in Facilities and Internationality (4.78). Student Life and Value also scored well, both above 4.3. Areas for potential improvement include Professors and Accommodation, which both received a rating of 4.22.
This university demonstrates notable strengths in its **Location**, receiving a high rating of 4.64. **Student Life** and **Internationality** are also well-regarded. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower score of 2.5. Other aspects like **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Value** fall within a moderate to good range.
Student feedback indicates strong satisfaction across several aspects of university life. Location stands out as the highest-rated area, with internationality and professors also receiving excellent marks. While student life and value are also highly regarded, facilities represent the weakest area among the surveyed categories. Overall, the institution demonstrates a solid performance with clear strengths in its external and academic offerings.
With an average rating of 4.22 out of 5, ~78% of reviews are positive. Students praise engaging courses, helpful instructors, and supportive guidance. No negative feedback was received.
~98% of reviews are positive, praising academic excellence, helpful faculty, and an enriching environment. A single negative review cited poor transport and inconsistent teacher support.
The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~97% of reviews being 4–5 stars. Students praise engaging courses, professional development opportunities, and supportive faculty. A small amount of negative feedback (~3%) mentions unmet expectations regarding course content and communication.
The sole review is highly positive (100%), with a 5/5 average rating. The feedback highlights excellent support during challenging times and engaging remote learning resources.
With a 4.56/5 average from 9 reviews, all feedback is positive. Students praise the great culture, diverse student body, supportive lecturers, and good facilities. Some mention minor areas for improvement, such as teaching standards and late-night food availability.
Most student feedback is positive (~63% 4-5 stars), highlighting excellent pedagogy, practical experiences, and supportive staff. The average rating is 3.81/5, with no negative reviews.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~95% of feedback highlighting an engaging, internationally relevant learning experience and a welcoming environment. Students appreciate practical learning, helpful staff, and international class settings. No negative feedback was recorded.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
My experience at LJMU has been parred none and has exceeded my expectations. The facilities are superb and staff members are accommodating, approachable and welcoming. Honestly speaking, attending LJMU feels like a home away from home. Socially the university has a very inclusive culture. I cannot speak for all programs, but the MA in Education has been life and career-transforming for me. I am very happy I chose LJMU.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This university has a lot of qualities such as adapting to students in order to optimize learning, and the desire to confront the student as quickly as possible with the world of work. On the other hand, I would criticize this school for poorly disseminated information and a gloomy community life.
First of all since my campus was in the heart of Rome, the place and inside of the university was like a whole museum. I love how friendly and helpful the staff was, the professors were one in a million. I love how they did all their best to tell us about the subjects in detail and in a fun way with examples for us to get into it more. I liked how they make time and engage in it and actually help us to teach us, so it was all in one reading writing with our own brain and infos searching for the sources by ourselves listening but also being able to express our own way of knowledge on the topics!
