Centro Federal de Educacao Tecnológica de Minas Gerais - CEFET-MG vs Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais - PUC Minas vs SKEMA Business School vs Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais - UFMG vs Centro Universitário de Belo Horizonte - UniBH
Side-by-side comparison from 151 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Strong technical and engineering programs
- +Knowledgeable and approachable professors
- +Access to labs and hands-on learning resources
- +Excellent professors and comprehensive curriculum
- +Strong market preparation and multicultural insights
- +Good infrastructure and organized institution
- +Practical, hands-on application of skills in business contexts
- +Relevant, up-to-date curriculum with industry-experienced professors
- +International experience and career support
- +Excellent teaching quality and demanding preparation for the job market.
- +Inspiring and supportive professors with high academic standards.
- +Top-notch research and outstanding facilities/labs.
- +Supportive and knowledgeable professors
- +Modern and broad campus infrastructure with labs
- +Convenient location
Nothing to show
- +Inclusive and diverse student community
- +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
- +High-quality and relevant academic programs
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a constant problem.
- -Lack of resources and support hinder learning.
- -Overcrowded and outdated facilities.
- -Lack of communication from administration and disorganized management.
- -Limited course offerings and outdated curriculum.
- -Poor communication and guidance from administration and faculty.
- -Disorganized program management and overwhelming course loads.
- -Concerns about faculty behavior and the school's financial focus over student well-being.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Inflexible and unclear course structures lead to dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are common complaints.
- -Lack of resources and support negatively impacts learning.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues disrupt student experience.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
- -Lack of effective communication and support is a significant concern.
This institution receives outstanding marks across multiple facets, with perfect scores awarded for its facilities, professors, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value. The location is also highly rated, though slightly below the exceptional standard set by other areas. Overall, the university demonstrates remarkable strength in almost every aspect.
This institution scores particularly well in its **facilities**, achieving an impressive 4.67. **Professors**, **location**, and **value** also stand out with strong marks of 4.5. The **student life** is rated positively at 4.4. Among the surveyed areas, **internationality** at 4.17 and **accommodation** at 4.2 received the lowest, though still respectable, scores.
The university demonstrates notable strengths in its teaching staff, receiving a high rating for professors. Internationality and location also received positive scores, indicating strong performance in these areas. However, accommodation presents a weaker point, with a significantly lower rating compared to other aspects. Overall, student life, facilities, and value for money are rated reasonably well.
This institution demonstrates significant strengths in its value proposition and location, both receiving high marks. Student life and internationality also score well, indicating a positive and globally engaged campus environment. Conversely, accommodation appears to be the weakest area, with a considerably lower rating compared to other aspects. Facilities and professors are rated solidly in the mid-range.
Outstanding marks in location, internationality, and value highlight the university's appeal. Facilities, while solid, represent its lowest-scoring area. Professors, student life, and accommodation all received commendable ratings, indicating a well-rounded experience. Overall, this institution offers significant strengths, particularly for those prioritizing location and affordability.
Nothing to show
This institution garners impressive scores across several key areas. It shines with perfect marks for its professors and student life, and boasts high ratings in internationality, facilities, location, and accommodation. The sole area receiving a comparatively lower score, though still strong, is its overall value.
The single review is highly positive, with a 5/5 rating. It highlights strong academics, particularly in technical fields, knowledgeable professors, and excellent laboratory access for hands-on learning. This positive sentiment represents 100% of the feedback.
With an average rating of 4.29/5, ~71% of feedback is positive, praising excellent professors, good infrastructure, and comprehensive programs. A small portion of feedback noted minor imperfections in technological features and graduation program structure.
With a 4.34 average rating from 132 reviews, ~90% are positive, highlighting practical AI and marketing curricula, and international experiences. A small ~3% of negative feedback mentions poor management and communication.
Students highly praise the university's demanding yet effective preparation for the job market, excellent professors, and strong research. The campus and facilities are noted as magnificent and beautiful. Negative feedback is minimal.
With an average rating of 4.5/5, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Recurring themes include modern infrastructure, convenient location, and well-trained, supportive professors. Some minor administrative slowness was noted.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4/5, reviews are overwhelmingly positive. Students highlighted inclusive learning environments and supportive faculty. Excellent infrastructure and a relevant curriculum were also noted.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show