Erasmus Hogeschool Brussel - EHB vs EIT Digital Master School vs Solvay Brussels School of Economics and Management vs Vesalius College Brussels - VeCo vs ICHEC Brussels Management School
Side-by-side comparison from 46 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Inclusive community and support for diverse students
- +High-quality teaching and artistic focus
- +Vibrant student life and cultural enrichment
Nothing to show
- +Strong economics and business programs
- +Supportive faculty and rigorous academics
- +Excellent networking and location
- +Accessible and supportive instructors
- +Engaging and well-structured courses
- +Strong career services and graduate support
- +Solid business & management foundation
- +International study & real-world experiences
- +Relevant, up-to-date curriculum
Nothing to show
- +Experiential learning and business creation
- +Industry leader insights and networking opportunities
- +Diverse international environment and impactful outcomes
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources detract from the learning experience.
- -Communication breakdowns and lack of transparency are recurring problems.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
- -administrative and management issues
- -lack of transparency and limited support
- -a disconnect between advertised quality and actual experience
- -Students dislike outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
- -They express frustration with administrative inefficiencies and lack of support.
- -Students find the curriculum inflexible and outdated.
Nothing to show
- -Disorganized and unresponsive administration.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Unengaging and ineffective teaching methods.
A varied profile emerges from these university ratings, with its strongest areas being **Internationality** (4.175) and **Location** (4.15). **Facilities** (3.833) and **Professors** (3.825) also received commendable scores. On the other hand, **Student Life** (3.225) and **Accomodation** (3.375) represent areas with the lowest reported satisfaction, while **Value** (3.725) falls in the mid-range.
Nothing to show
This institution garners exceptional marks in several key areas, particularly excelling in **Location**, **Student Life**, and **Value**, all receiving perfect scores. Professors and both accommodation and internationality also score highly with 4.5. The university's facilities are rated at a respectable 4, representing the lowest score among the evaluated aspects.
This university received uniformly average ratings of 1 across all evaluated categories. There are no standout strengths or weaknesses, indicating a consistent level of performance across facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value. The institution presents a balanced, albeit unremarkable, profile based on this assessment.
This university garners high marks for Internationality, its strongest area, with a rating of 4.39. Value is also a significant strength at 4.12. Professors are well-regarded with a score of 4.0. Areas for improvement include Facilities, rated at 3.33, and Location, which received the lowest score of 3.06. Student Life and Accomodation fall in the mid-range.
Nothing to show
This institution garners strong overall evaluations, with location standing out as the highest-rated aspect at 4.67. Accommodations and internationality also received excellent scores of 4.5. Areas demonstrating solid performance include facilities and student life, both at 4.33, alongside value and professors, which are rated at 4.25.
Three out of five reviews are positive (60%). Students highlight financial and community resources, classroom experience, and cultural diversity as strengths. One review mentioned building infrastructure could be improved.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.5/5, all feedback is positive, highlighting strong academics and networking. Reviews commend knowledgeable faculty and rigorous coursework, though workload can be demanding.
Two reviews exist, both negative (1-2 stars) with an average rating of 1/5. Feedback highlights limited support, questionable transparency, and an internal culture needing improvement.
Approximately 100% of reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.09/5. Students highlight the program's demanding yet solid foundation, practical learning with real-life cases, and international opportunities like Erasmus. No negative feedback was recorded.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.4/5 from 5 reviews, students are highly satisfied. Recurring positive themes include practical, hands-on learning experiences and valuable networking opportunities. A minimal amount of feedback noted occasional scheduling issues with tutoring.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Being here has been such a wild ride. Moving to a new country every semester and learning local languages has been both fun and challenging, but it's kinda exhausting too. Still, that hustle gives me an adrenaline rush I low-key love! The best part has been seeing our business ideas come to life and when people genuinely appreciate and engage with something we’ve built, it makes all the hard work worth it.
