Escuela Superior de Administración Pública - ESAP vs Technical University of Berlin - TU Berlin vs ESSEC Business School vs Polytechnic University Of the Philippines - PUP vs University Sultan Moulay Slimane - USMS

Side-by-side comparison from 135 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Haigazian University (5.00)
Escuela Superior de Administración Pública - ESAP: wins 0/6 categories
Technical University of Berlin - TU Berlin: wins 1/6 categories
ESSEC Business School: wins 4/6 categories
Polytechnic University Of the Philippines - PUP: wins 0/6 categories
University Sultan Moulay Slimane - USMS: wins 0/6 categories
Haigazian University: wins 1/6 categories
Bangladesh Dental College: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Chemical Engineering
Best programme: Bachelor of Business Administration
Best programme: Bachelor of International Studies
Best programme: Economics and Management
Beirut, Lebanon
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Applied Economics
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
4.00
4.31
Win
2.77
3.00
4.00
2.00
Location
Not rated
3.94
3.53
4.17
2.70
5.00
5.00
Professors
Not rated
4.06
4.33
Win
3.60
3.64
4.00
2.00
Internationality
Not rated
4.22
4.67
Win
3.54
2.73
4.00
2.00
Student life
Not rated
4.06
4.42
Win
4.28
2.90
4.00
3.00
Value
Not rated
4.00
4.40
4.27
3.45
5.00
Win
1.00
Accommodation
Not rated
3.71
Win
3.65
3.31
2.73
3.00
2.00
Pros & Cons
Pros

Nothing to show

  • +Expert and supportive faculty
  • +Practical application and research focus
  • +Flexible learning and vibrant student life
  • +High-quality, knowledgeable professors
  • +Strong academic rigor and valuable skill development
  • +Welcoming environment with good campus facilities and opportunities
  • +Passionate, experienced, and inspiring professors
  • +Affordable and practical education
  • +Opportunities for personal growth and belonging
  • +Competent, knowledgeable, and supportive faculty
  • +Well-structured courses and strong academic foundation
  • +Value in the job market and diverse specializations
  • +academic excellence & dedicated faculty
  • +vibrant learning environment & community engagement
  • +promotion of cultural awareness & critical thinking

Nothing to show

Cons

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a common complaint.
  • -Lack of effective teaching and support is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues are frustrating.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor accommodation are common complaints.
  • -Location is inconvenient and perceived as unsafe at night.
  • -Administrative and management issues, including unresponsive administration and poor professor accountability.
  • -Outdated facilities and curriculum that lacks current industry knowledge.
  • -Unequal treatment and dismissive attitudes towards students based on their learning choices.
  • -Difficulty with transportation and campus accessibility.
  • -Poor quality of campus facilities and resources.
  • -Ineffective teaching methods and curriculum relevance.
  • -Overcrowded classes and limited resources hinder learning.
  • -Inflexible academic policies and unresponsive administrative staff cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern technology detract from the educational experience.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Nothing to show

With an overall rating of 4, this institution demonstrates commendable strengths in **Internationality** (4.22) and **Student Life** (4.06), alongside solid scores for **Professors** and **Value**. Its **Accomodation** presents the area with the lowest score (3.71), suggesting potential for improvement in this aspect.

This university receives commendable feedback, with Internationality standing out as its strongest aspect, achieving a high rating. Student Life and Value also perform very well, indicating a positive experience and good return on investment for students. Conversely, Location and Accommodation are areas where the university is rated less favorably, suggesting potential for improvement in these particular domains.

This institution shows notable strengths in student life, with a score of 4.28, and value, rated at 4.27. Location also received a high mark at 4.17. Conversely, facilities represent the weakest area, scoring 2.77. Other categories like professors, internationality, and accommodation fall within a moderate range.

Across surveyed categories, this institution shows notable strengths in its **Professors** (3.64) and **Value** (3.45). Conversely, its **Location** and **Accomodation** (both 2.73), along with **Internationality** (2.73), received the lowest marks. **Facilities** (3.0) and **Student Life** (2.9) fall in the middle range of these assessments.

This institution garners excellent scores in several key areas, notably achieving a perfect rating for its **location** and strong marks for **value** and **professors**. While student life and facilities are also well-regarded, the **accommodation** rating stands as the weakest aspect, suggesting potential for improvement in that specific domain. Overall, the university presents a compelling proposition, particularly for those prioritizing accessibility and affordability.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Nothing to show

With a 4/5 average rating from 19 reviews, students praise strong academics, particularly in STEM fields, and appreciate research focus and practical application. Positive feedback highlights well-prepared professors and diverse learning opportunities. No negative feedback was reported.

With a 4.45 average rating from 49 reviews, ~94% of feedback is positive, praising knowledgeable professors, excellent financial support, and enriching academic environments. A small portion (~2%) noted location and accommodation concerns.

~78% of reviews are positive, highlighting passionate professors, practical learning, and personal growth opportunities. A small amount of feedback (~6%) notes issues with outdated facilities and administrative responsiveness.

With a 4.09 average rating from 11 reviews, ~74% of feedback is positive. Students highlight competent teachers, well-structured courses, and valuable degrees. Limited negative feedback mentions remote location and transportation issues.

With one review, the average rating is a perfect 5/5. This sole feedback is highly favorable, appreciating academic excellence, diversity, and a vibrant learning environment.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
0%
21%
55%
46%
55%
100%
0%
4★
0%
58%
39%
31%
9%
0%
0%
3★
0%
21%
4%
17%
27%
0%
100%
2★
0%
0%
0%
4%
9%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
2%
2%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

ESSEC BBA : It's worth it

Essec BBA is a well known program if you want to attend a business school. The teaching is qualitative as the teachers usually are reputed experts in their fields. As far as it concerns the campus, you cannot complain about the diversity and quality of high tech equipment or the comfortable auditoriums. Pretty much everything is made for you to feel at ease and evolve as an ESSEC student. One of the rare things I could point out is the school campus location which is pretty much isolated and a bit far from the centre of Paris, otherwise, you can take public transport, easy to use and practical for your everyday student life.

PUP Honest Review

For me, PUP is okay. Because it is a public university, the facilities are not that good, but considering that the tuition is free, it is good for less fortunate students who want to finish. I have good and bad experiences in PUP just like the profs who are not that hard to teach, there are profs who are very passionate about teaching.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close