emlyon business school vs SKEMA Business School vs L'École de Design Nantes Atlantique vs INSEEC Business School vs South China University of Technology
Side-by-side comparison from 203 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical, international focus and diverse student body.
- +Strong career support and professional experience opportunities.
- +Diverse program options and personal project development.
- +Practical, hands-on application of skills in business contexts
- +Relevant, up-to-date curriculum with industry-experienced professors
- +International experience and career support
- +Supportive environment & welcoming community
- +Prestigious European university for design
- +Focus on practical application over theory
- +Practical, group-focused learning and professional initiation.
- +High-quality teaching and supportive faculty mentorship.
- +Strong professional network and vibrant student life.
- +supportive teachers and valuable academic guidance
- +vibrant international community and diverse student body
- +positive and fun college experience
Nothing to show
- +Supportive learning environment
- +Competent and friendly teachers
- +Real-world art curriculum
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and unclear expectations lead to dissatisfaction.
- -Poor communication and guidance from administration and faculty.
- -Disorganized program management and overwhelming course loads.
- -Concerns about faculty behavior and the school's financial focus over student well-being.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Ineffective teaching and curriculum create learning difficulties.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
- -Lack of student support and responsiveness from administration.
- -Uninspiring curriculum and teaching methods.
- -Excessive administrative and communication problems.
- -Lack of resources and outdated facilities.
- -Poor teaching quality and irrelevant curriculum.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues create confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning and comfort.
- -Lack of clear communication and responsiveness from staff is a consistent problem.
This institution demonstrates a generally positive standing, with its strongest areas being **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring above 4.6. **Student Life** and **Value** also received high marks, around 4.3 and 4.49 respectively. The **Facilities** and **Professors** are rated well, in the low 4s. **Accomodation** appears to be the relatively weakest area, with a score of 4.
The university demonstrates notable strengths in its teaching staff, receiving a high rating for professors. Internationality and location also received positive scores, indicating strong performance in these areas. However, accommodation presents a weaker point, with a significantly lower rating compared to other aspects. Overall, student life, facilities, and value for money are rated reasonably well.
Offering a well-rounded experience, this institution excels in its facilities, professor quality, accommodation, and internationality, all receiving a strong rating of 4. While student life and location are rated a respectable 3, these areas represent opportunities for improvement compared to its more robust aspects. Overall, the university presents a very positive offering.
This university demonstrates notable strengths in its **Location**, receiving a high rating of 4.64. **Student Life** and **Internationality** are also well-regarded. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower score of 2.5. Other aspects like **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Value** fall within a moderate to good range.
This institution receives strong praise for its vibrant student life, achieving a high rating of 4.6. Professors are also well-regarded at 4.4. Areas needing improvement, however, include internationality, with a lower score of 3.8, indicating potential for growth in global engagement. Other categories like facilities, location, accommodation, and value all score a solid 4.2.
Nothing to show
This institution garners exceptional scores in several key areas, notably its **professors, location, student life, and internationality, all receiving perfect marks**. Facilities are also well-regarded. The weakest area identified is accommodation, with a rating of 3. Overall, the university presents a very strong offering, with value for money also rated positively.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~90% 4-5 stars) with an average rating of 4.53/5. Students praise the academic rigor, practical and international focus, and diverse student body.
With a 4.34 average rating from 132 reviews, ~90% are positive, highlighting practical AI and marketing curricula, and international experiences. A small ~3% of negative feedback mentions poor management and communication.
The university receives strong positive feedback, with 100% of reviews being positive. Students highlight a welcoming environment for international students and supportive teachers. Some desire more challenging main projects and theoretical lectures.
Most student feedback is positive (~63% 4-5 stars), highlighting excellent pedagogy, practical experiences, and supportive staff. The average rating is 3.81/5, with no negative reviews.
With an average rating of 4.2/5, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students praise teachers, friends, and international life, noting enjoyable college years and skilled academic support. No negative feedback was provided.
Nothing to show
With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this university is highly praised by its sole reviewer. They highlight the supportive learning environment and competent, friendly teachers, particularly for foreign students.
Nothing to show
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
Nothing to show
This university has a lot of qualities such as adapting to students in order to optimize learning, and the desire to confront the student as quickly as possible with the world of work. On the other hand, I would criticize this school for poorly disseminated information and a gloomy community life.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
